Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The impact of attention to social information on the development of socialization in childhood Cover

The impact of attention to social information on the development of socialization in childhood

By: Toru Fujioka and  Hirotaka Kosaka  
Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

FIGURE 1.

Gazefinder movie samples and their areas-of-interest (AoIs). (A) Screenshot of the human face without mouth motion; AoI-1 and AoI-2 include the eye and mouth regions, respectively; (B) Screenshot of the human face with mouth motion; AoI-1 and AoI-2 include the eye and mouth regions, respectively; (C) Screenshot of biological motion; AoI-1 and AoI-2 are the upright and inverted images, respectively; (D) Screenshot of the preference paradigm; AoI-1 and AoI-2 are people and geometry, respectively; (E) Screenshot of finger pointing; AoI-1 and AoI-2 are social and geometry areas, respectively.
Gazefinder movie samples and their areas-of-interest (AoIs). (A) Screenshot of the human face without mouth motion; AoI-1 and AoI-2 include the eye and mouth regions, respectively; (B) Screenshot of the human face with mouth motion; AoI-1 and AoI-2 include the eye and mouth regions, respectively; (C) Screenshot of biological motion; AoI-1 and AoI-2 are the upright and inverted images, respectively; (D) Screenshot of the preference paradigm; AoI-1 and AoI-2 are people and geometry, respectively; (E) Screenshot of finger pointing; AoI-1 and AoI-2 are social and geometry areas, respectively.

FIGURE 2.

Cross-lagged effects model of the scores of Gazefinder and VABS-II.
Cross-lagged effects model of the scores of Gazefinder and VABS-II.

FIGURE 3.

Cross-lagged panel model of percentage fixation times for social information and socialization scores of VABSII. Note. *p < .05, **p < .01. The values on the path were for the standardized coefficient (β). The values from the top are for the human face without mouth motion, the human face with mouth motion, biological motion, preference paradigm, and finger-pointing. The results for (D), the preference paradigm that met all four model-fit criteria, are underlined in bold.
Cross-lagged panel model of percentage fixation times for social information and socialization scores of VABSII. Note. *p < .05, **p < .01. The values on the path were for the standardized coefficient (β). The values from the top are for the human face without mouth motion, the human face with mouth motion, biological motion, preference paradigm, and finger-pointing. The results for (D), the preference paradigm that met all four model-fit criteria, are underlined in bold.

Descriptive statistics for each index at the three time points_

Wave 1Wave 2Wave 3Fpηp2
Age (range)4.01 ± 0.84 (2.10–5.57)5.22 ± 0.66 (4.19–6.61)6.57 ± 0.63 (5.25–7.61)350.515< .0010.938
SRS (range)29.52 ± 9.46 (9–46)25.96 ± 10.74 (7–48)24.30 ± 12.83 (4–69)2.841.0690.114
WISC-IV FSIQ (range) 104.82±12.63 (85–130)
Gazefinder
Face without mouth motion
  Eye region (%)46.3 ± 19.556.3 ± 12.453.0 ± 18.70.688.5080.029
  Mouth region (%)18.1 ± 12.820.8 ± 10.920.7 ± 13.52.971.0610.114
Face with mouth motion
  Eye region (%)25.3 ± 15.522.9 ± 16.526.4 ± 17.60.521.5970.022
  Mouth region (%)44.9 ± 27.154.6 ± 18.852.5 ± 20.72.407.1180.095
Biological Motion (BM)
  Upright (%)48.5 ± 18.653.2 ± 16.547.2 ± 20.10.735.4850.031
Preference Paradigm
  People region (%)45.1 ± 18.944.5 ± 11.646.9 ± 12.30.267.7080.011
Finger Pointing
  Social (%)39.7 ± 23.336.1 ± 11.741.9 ± 12.00.951.3780.040
VABS-II
  Communication100.5 ± 10.599.0 ± 9.9103.3 ± 8.81.949.1540.078
  Socialization103.6 ± 6.6100.7 ± 8.498.1 ± 10.33.147.0520.120
  Daily living skills103.9 ± 11.3103.5 ± 11.5100.1 ± 12.71.224.3040.051
Language: English
Page range: 44 - 53
Published on: Jun 7, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Toru Fujioka, Hirotaka Kosaka, published by Psychiatric Research Unit
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.