Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Logos Reconstructed: On the Ideal of Adam’s Originally Perfect Language and Recovering its Semiotic Realism Cover

Logos Reconstructed: On the Ideal of Adam’s Originally Perfect Language and Recovering its Semiotic Realism

By:
Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Augustine. (2012). Confessions. Oxford University Press.
  2. Aquinas, T. (1845). Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels, Collected Out of the Works of the Fathers (Vol. IV). John Henry Parker.
  3. Bar-On, D. (1990). Scepticism: The External World and Meaning. Philosophical Studies, 60(3), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00367470">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00367470
  4. Barney, R. (2016). Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. Taylor & Francis.
  5. Baştürk, E. (2019). The Potentiality of ’Politics’ in Aristotle: The Logos and Meaningful Speech among Men. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1452">https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1452
  6. Bennington, G., & Derrida, J. (1993). Jacques Derrida. University of Chicago Press.
  7. Buckwalter, W., & Turri, J. (2019). Knowledge and Truth: A Skeptical Challenge. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 101(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12298">https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12298
  8. Chadha, M. (2014). On Knowing Universals: The Nyāya Way. Philosophy East and West, 64(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2014.0036">https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2014.0036.
  9. Chakrabarti, K. (2019). The Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika Theory of Universals. Indian Philosophy, 201–217. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816513-13">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816513-13.
  10. Chalmers, D. J. (2014). Constructing the World. Oxford University Press.
  11. Chang, H. (2022). Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Chase, J., & Rush, P. (2016). Factivity, Consistency and Knowability. Synthese, 195(2), 899–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1253-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1253-3.
  13. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger.
  14. Chomsky, N. (2005). Three Factors in Language Design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655">https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655.
  15. Cunningham, S. (1976). The Transcendental Reduction and Language. Phaenomenologica, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1389-5_3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1389-5_3.
  16. Dahlberg, K. (2006). The essence of essences – the search for meaning structures in phenomenological analysis of lifeworld phenomena. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620500478405">https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620500478405
  17. Danesi, M. (2022). Saussure’s View of Language as a System of Arbitrary Signs. Language and Semiotic Studies, 8(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2022-080103">https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2022-080103.
  18. Devitt, M. (1997). Realism and Truth. Princeton University Press.
  19. Dravid, R. R. (1972). The Problem of Universals in Indian Philosophy. M. Banarsidass.
  20. Durfee, H. A. (1976). Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Nijhoff.
  21. Eco, U. (1997). The Search for the Perfect Language. Fontana.
  22. Fasching, W. (2012). Intentionality and Presence: On the Intrinsic of-Ness of Consciousness from a Transcendental-Phenomenological Perspective. Husserl Studies, 28(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-012-9106-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-012-9106-5.
  23. Fodor, J. A. (1990). A Theory of Content. In A Theory of Content and Other Essays (pp. 51–136). MIT Press.
  24. Fodor, J. A. (2010). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.
  25. Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism Examined. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980125310">https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980125310.
  26. Fuhrmann, A. (2014). Knowability as Potential Knowledge. Synthese, 191(7), 1627–1649. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24021562.
  27. Fumerton, R. A. (1995). Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Rowman & Littlefield.
  28. Gamertsfelder, W. S. (1933). Current Skepticism of Metaphysics. Monist, 43(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist193343146">https://doi.org/10.5840/monist193343146.
  29. Gasche, R. (2004). Universality in the Making: On Edmund Husserl’s Conception of the One World. Interdisziplinäre Phänomenologie.
  30. Gautama, M. R. Dasti, & S. H. Phillips. (2017). The Nyāya-Sūtra: Selections with Early Commentaries. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
  31. Goodman, G. (1616). The Fall of Man, or, The Corruption of Nature, Proved by the Light of Our Naturall Reason. F. Kyngson.
  32. Graheli, A. (2022). The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Philosophy of Language. Bloomsbury Academic.
  33. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Harper San Francisco.
  34. Hermberg, K. (2007). Husserl’s Phenomenology: Knowledge, Objectivity and Others. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
  35. Holy Bible: New International Version. (2005). Zondervan.
  36. Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditation: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Nijhoff.
  37. Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic. Nijhoff.
  38. Husserl, E. (1980). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Nijhoff.
  39. Husserl, E. (2008). Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge. Springer.
  40. Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations. Routledge.
  41. Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
  42. Husserl, E., & Landgrebe, L. (1973). Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Routledge and K. Paul.
  43. Hutcheson, P. (1979). Solipsistic and Intersubjective Phenomenology. Human Studies, 4(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02127455">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02127455.
  44. Jones, M. P. (2000). Transcendental Intersubjectivity and the Objects of the Human Sciences. Symposium, 4(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium20004217">https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium20004217.
  45. Jones, N. (2010). Nyāya-Vaiśesika Inherence, Buddhist Reduction, and Huayan Total Power. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 37(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2010.01579.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2010.01579.x.
  46. Kaṇāda, & Sinha, N. (1923). The aiśeṣika Sūtras of Kaṇāda. Allahabad.
  47. Katz, J. J. (1982). Language and Other Abstract Objects. Blackwell.
  48. Kripke, S. A. (1984). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Blackwell.
  49. Kulstad, M. A. (1977). Leibniz’s Conception of Expression. Studia Leibnitiana, 9, 55-76.
  50. Kumar, P. (1997). The ‘Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika’ and the Buddhist Controversy over the Problem of Universals. East and West, 47(1/4), 95–104. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29757320.
  51. Larsen, H. G., & Adu, P. (2021). Understanding Epoché and Bracketing. In The Theoretical Framework in Phenomenological Research (pp. 60–88). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084259-3">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084259-3.
  52. Leibniz, G. W. (1949). New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, Together with an Appendix Consisting of Some of His Shorter Pieces. Open Court Pub. Co.
  53. Leonard, J. (1990). Naming in Paradise: Milton and the Language of Adam and Eve. Clarendon Press.
  54. Locke, J. (1970). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: 1690. Scolar Press.
  55. Losonsky, M. (1992). Leibniz’s Adamic Language of Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30(4), 523-643. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1992.0071">https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1992.0071.
  56. Lutz, S. (2011). Artificial Language Philosophy of Science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0042-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0042-6.
  57. Matilal, B. K. (1975). Causality in the Nyaya-Vaisesika School. Philosophy East and West, 25(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1398431">https://doi.org/10.2307/1398431.
  58. Meixner, U. (2014). Defending Husserl: A Plea in the Case of Wittgenstein and Company Versus Phenomenology. W. de Gruyter.
  59. Merleau-Ponty, M., & Smith, C. (2018). Phenomenology of Perception. Franklin Classics.
  60. Milton, J., Hale, J. K., & Cullington, J. D. (2012). The Complete Works of John Milton, Vol. 8: De Doctrina Christiana, Vol. 1. In Oxford University Press eBooks.
  61. Nyseth, F. (2020). Linguistic Conventionalism and the Truth-Contrast Thesis. The Philosophical Quarterly, 71(2), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa036">https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa036.
  62. Perrett, R. W. (1999). Is Whatever Exists Knowable and Nameable? Philosophy East & West, 49(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1399945">https://doi.org/10.2307/1399945.
  63. Perrett, R. W. (1984). The Problem of Induction in Indian Philosophy. Philosophy East and West, 34(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1398916">https://doi.org/10.2307/1398916.
  64. Petrescu, A. (2013). The Transcendental - Phenomenological Perspective on Intersubjectivity: Various Aspects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 71, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.003.
  65. Plato, & Fowler, H. N. (1992). Cratylus. Harvard University Press.
  66. Rasmussen, W. (2008). The Realism of Universals in Plato and Nyāya. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 37(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9060-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9060-x.
  67. Rompaey, C. V. (2015). Language and meaning in the ethics. or, why bother with Spinoza’s Latin? Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, 24, 355.
  68. Rump, J. (2020). Husserlian Phenomenology, Rule-Following, and Primitive Normativity. Language and Phenomenology, 74–91. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429278600-6">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429278600-6.
  69. Russell, M., & Reynolds, J. (2011). Transcendental Arguments about Other Minds and Intersubjectivity. Philosophy Compass, 6(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00394.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00394.x.
  70. Saussure, F. de, Bally, C., Sechehaye, A., & Reidlinger, A. (1966). Course in General Linguistics: Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  71. Sharma, R. K. (2013). Is Nyāya Realist or Idealist? Carrying on a Conversation Started by Daya Krishna. Philosophy East and West, 63(4), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2013.0067">https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2013.0067.
  72. Shaw, J. L. (1978). The Nyāya on Existence, Knowability and Nameability. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 5(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00161267">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00161267.
  73. Sidelle, A. (2009). Conventionalism and the Contingency of Conventions. Noûs, 43(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00704.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00704.x.
  74. Siderits, M. (1997). Buddhist Reductionism. Philosophy East and West, 47(4), 455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1400298">https://doi.org/10.2307/1400298.
  75. Staiti, A. (2021). The Transcendental and the Eidetic Dimensions of Husserl’s Phenomenology. The Husserlian Mind, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243790-10">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243790-10.
  76. Trivigno, F. V. (2012). Etymology and the Power of Names in Plato’s Cratylus. Ancient Philosophy, 32(1), 35–75. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20123213">https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20123213.
  77. Vargas, G. M. (2020). Alfred Schutz’s Life-World and Intersubjectivity. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(12), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.812033">https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.812033.
  78. Vollet, L. (2023). Kant’s Dynamic Metaphysics: Kant’s Theory of Judgment and the Nature of the Theoretical Knowledge of Consistency in Empirical Reasoning. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, 23(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v23i1.3177">https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v23i1.3177.
  79. Webster, J. (1654). Academiarum examen, or the examination of academies ... as also some expedients proposed for the reforming of schools. London.
  80. Wilkins, J. (1668). An essay towards a real character. Gellibrand.
  81. Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical Investigation. Macmillan.
  82. Zahavi, D. (2001). Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique. Ohio University Press.
  83. Zhang, J. (2021). Transcendental Co-Originariness of Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity, and the World: Another Way of Reading Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology. Human Studies, 44(1), 121– 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09573-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09573-8.
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 40
Published on: Apr 30, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2025 Rayan Magon, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.