Have a personal or library account? Click to login
No Perils of Rejecting the Parity Argument Cover

No Perils of Rejecting the Parity Argument

By: Mustafa Khuramy and  Erik Schulz  
Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Zhou, Y., & Borchert, R. (2023). The perils of rejecting the parity argument. Philosophy, 98(2), 215–241. doi:10.1017/s0031819123000037.
  2. Kassenberg, E. (2021). Debunking the argument from queerness. Ratio, 34(4), 312–323. doi:10.1111/rati.12306.
  3. Morton, J., & Sampson, E. (2014). Parsimony and the argument from queerness. Res Philosophica, 91(4), 609–627. doi:10.11612/resphil.2014.91.4.4.
  4. Booth, A. R. (2020). The type-B moral error theory. Erkenntnis, 87(5), 2181–2199. doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00297-2.
  5. Mackie, J. L. (1979). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
  6. Reisner, A. E. (2011). Reasons for belief. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Olson, J. (2014). Moral error theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford University Press.
  8. Cosker-Rowland, R. (2017). Moral error theory and the argument from epistemic reasons. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 7(1), 1–25. doi:10.26556/jesp.v7i1.69.
  9. Das, R. (2015a). Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Still Work: Reply to Cowie. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(262), 152–160. doi:10.1093/pq/pqv078.
  10. Cuneo, T. (2012). The normative web: An argument for moral realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Language: English
Page range: 28 - 33
Published on: Mar 5, 2025
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Mustafa Khuramy, Erik Schulz, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.