Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Foreign Exchange Rate-Femicide Nexus in Turkey: Evidence from the Cointegration Tests Based on Nonlinear and Fourier Functions

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Corry, J. The Satirical Review of London at the Commencement of the Nineteenth Century, London: G. Kearsley, 1801.
  2. Radford, J. Introduction, In Femicide: Politics of Woman Killing, Radford, J., and Russell, D. (ed.), 1992, pp.3-13. Buckingham: Open U.P.
  3. Radford, J., and Russell, D. Femicide: the Politics of Woman Killing, New York: Twayne Publishers, Buckingham, England: Open University Press, 1992.
  4. Gazioğlu, E. Femicide: Conceptualization and Problematic Approaches. Social Policy Studies Çalışmaları 7(30), 2013, pp.89-100. (in Turkish).
  5. Corradi, C., Marcuello-Servós, C., Boira, S., and Weil, S. Theories of Femicide and Their Significance for Social Research. Current Sociology, 64(7), 2016, pp.976-95.
  6. Grech, V. Gendercide and Femineglect. Early Human Development, 91(12), 2015, pp.851-54.
  7. Corradi, C., Marcuello-Servós, C., Boira, S., and Weil, S. Theories of Femicide and Their Significance for Social Research. Current Sociology, 64(7), 2016, pp.976-95.
  8. Radford, J., and Russell, D. Femicide: the Politics of Woman Killing, New York: Twayne Publishers, Buckingham, England: Open University Press, 1992.
  9. Russell, D., and Harmes, R. Femicide in Global Perspective, New York and London: Teachers College Press, 2001.
  10. Ertürk, Y. Violence Without Borders, The Phenomenon of Violence against Women in Paradigm, Politics and Practice, Istanbul: Metis Publications, 2015. (in Turkish).
  11. Hudson, V. The Missing Girls of China and India: What is Being Done? Cumberland Law Review, 41(1), 2010, pp.67-78.
  12. World Health Organization (WHO). (2013), Global and Regional Estimates of Violence Against Women: Prevalence and Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-Partner Sexual Violence. Geneva: WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85239/9789241564625_eng.pdf;jsessionid=BBE85AA 40140EDF8E2D68D0D67B6514E?sequence=1
  13. Friedman, J. Globalization, the State and Violence, New York: Alta Mira Press, 2003.
  14. Buscher, H., and Mueller, C. Exchange Rate Volatility Effects on the German Labour Market: a Survey of Recent Results and Extensions. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 37, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), 1997.
  15. Gordon, R. Inflation, Flexible Exchange Rates, and the Natural Rate of Unemployment. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, 1981.
  16. Bertrand, M. From the Invisible Handshake to the Invisible Hand? How Import Competition Changes the Employment Relationship. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, 1999.
  17. Song, M. S. Korea’s Fast Recovery: the Role of Macroeconomic Policies and Reform Programs. Social Science, 410, 2000.
  18. Kazgan, G. Crises in the Turkish Economy, Istanbul: Bilgi University Publications, 2017. (in Turkish).
  19. Demir, F. Exchange Rate Volatility and Employment Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Turkey. World Development 8(38), 2009, pp.1127-40.
  20. De Vogli, R., De Falco, R., and Mattei, G. Excess Suicides Due to the Global Economic Crisis in Italy: an Update. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 43(2-3), 2019, pp.111.
  21. Olivera, M. Violencia Femicida: Violence Against Women and Mexico’s Structural Crisis. Latin American Perspectives, 33(2), 2006.
  22. Connell, R. Hegomonicmasculinity and Violence: Responseto Jefferson and Hall. Theoretical Criminology 6(1), 2002, pp.89-99.
  23. Mansley, E. A. Intimate Partner Violence: Race, Social Class and Masculunity, El Paso: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2009.
  24. Arıkan, Ç. A Domestic Violence against Women: Causes, Consequences and Solution Suggestions, Ankara: SASAM Publications, 2016. (in Turkish).
  25. Altıparmak, İ. B. The Role of ŞÖNİMs in Combating Domestic Violence against Women: The Case of Ankara. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies 36, 2015, pp.449-464. (in Turkish).
  26. Newman, D. Sociology (D. Ali Arslan, trans.), Ankara: Nobel Publications, 2013. (in Turkish).
  27. Altınay, A. G., and Arat, Y. Violence against Women in Turkey, Istanbul: Punto Print, 2008. (in Turkish).
  28. Açıkgöz, R., and Yusufoğlu, Ö. Ş. The Poverty Phenomenon and Social Reflections in Turkey. Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research 1(1), 2012, pp.76-117. (in Turkish).
  29. Arıkan, Ç. A Domestic Violence against Women: Causes, Consequences and Solution Suggestions, Ankara: SASAM Publications, 2016. (in Turkish).
  30. BAAKB (Prime Minister Family Research Council) Violence in the Family and in the Social Sphere. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Family Research Council Publications, 1998. (in Turkish).
  31. Kocadaş, B., and Kılıç, M. Violence Perception of Women and Children in Low Socio-Economic Structure. International Symposium on Violence against Women and Children with International Participation, Ankara, 2012.
  32. Sallan Gül, S. Feminization of Poverty in Turkey. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 38(1), 2005, pp.25-45. (in Turkish).
  33. Association of Forensic Medicine Specialists. Domestic Violence in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Bulletin of Forensic Medicine 25, 2020, pp.48-57. (in Turkish).
  34. Barnet, R. J., and Cavanagh, J. Global Dreams Emperor Corporations and the New World Order, (Gülden Şen, trans.) Istanbul: Sabah Books. (in Turkish), 1995.
  35. Aksu, H., and Akkuş, Y. An Essay on the Socioeconomic Determinants of Crimes against Property in Turkey: A Bounds Test Approach (1970-2007). Socioeconomics 1, 2010, pp.192-214. (in Turkish).
  36. Altındağ, D. Crime and Unemployment: Evidence from Europe. International Review of Law and Economics 32(1), 2012, pp.145-57.
  37. Andresen, M.A. Unemployment and Crime: a Neighborhood Level Panel Data Approach. Social Science Research 41, 2012, pp.1615-28.
  38. Ata, A. Y. The Relationship Between Wages, Unemployment and Crime: Horizontal Cross-Section Analysis. Labour and Society 4, 2011, pp.113-34. (in Turkish).
  39. Blomquist, J., and Westerlund, J. A. Non-Stationary Panel Data Investigation of the Unemployment–Crime Relationship. Social Science Research 44, 2014, pp.114-25.
  40. Cerro, A., and Meloni, O. Determinants of the Crime Rate in Argentina During the ‘90s. Estudios de Economia 27(2), 2000, pp.297-311.
  41. Cömertler, N., and Kar, M. Socio-Economic Determinants of Crime Rate in Turkey: A Horizontal Cross Section Analysis. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences 62(2), 2007, pp.37-57. (in Turkish).
  42. Tunca, H. Socio-Economic Determinants of Crime: Panel Data Analysis. Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research (4), 2019, pp.2767-84. (in Turkish).
  43. Yıldız, R., Öcal, O., and Yıldırım, E. Socioeconomic Determinants of Crime: An Application on Kayseri. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 36, 2010, pp.15-31. (in Turkish).
  44. Cerro, A., and Meloni, O. Determinants of the Crime Rate in Argentina During the ‘90s. Estudios de Economia 27(2), 2000, pp.297-311.
  45. Chintrakarn, P., and Herzer, D. More Inequality, More Crime? A Panel Cointegration Analysis for the Unites States. Economics Letters 116(3), 2012, pp.389-91.
  46. Akıncı-Çötok, N. Women’s Perception of the Phenomenon of Violence against Women within Gender Role. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 1(3), 2015, pp.937-952. (in Turkish).
  47. Kardam, F., and Yüksel, İ. Perception of Domestic Violence: Qualitative Research Results, Research on Violence against Women in Turkey, Ankara: General Directorate on the Status of Women, 2009. (in Turkish).
  48. Kardam, F., and Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ. Men’s Views / Experiences / Perceptions on Violence against Women. Kadın/Woman 2000, 10(1), 2011, pp.55-78. (in Turkish).
  49. Altınay, A. G., and Arat, Y. Violence against Women in Turkey, Istanbul: Punto Print, 2008.
  50. Owen, F., and Owen, D. Domestic Violence against Women, Ankara: General Directorate on the Status of Women’s Problems, 2008. (in Turkish).
  51. Rand, M., and Rennison, C. How Much Violence Againts Women is There?. In Violence Againts Women and Family Violence: Devolopments in Research, Practice and Policy, Fischer, Bonnie S. (ed.,), 2004. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/199701.pdf
  52. Elson, D. Gender Justice Human Rights, and Neo-Liberal Economic Policies, In Gender, Justice, Development, and Rights, Molyneux, Maxine and Razavi, Shahra (ed.,), 2003, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.78-114.
  53. True, J. Gender, Globalization and Postsocialism: the Czech Repuclic After Communism, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.
  54. Anderson, K.L. Gender, Status and Domestic Violence, an Integration of Feminist and Family Violence Approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family 59(3), 1997, pp.655-669.
  55. Ertürk, Y. Violence Against Women, Its Causes and Consequences Turkey Report, IHOP, 2007. (in Turkish).
  56. Macmillan, R., and Gartner, R. When She Brings Home the Bacon: Labor-Force Participation and the Risk of Spousal Violence Against Women. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(4), 1999, pp.947-958.
  57. Chant, S. Men in crisis? Reflections on masculinities, work and family in Northwest Costa Rica, In Men at Work: Labor, Masculinities, Development, Jackson, C. (ed.), 2001, London: Frank Cass, pp.199-218.
  58. Seguino, S. The Road to Gender Equility: Global Trends and the Way Forward, In Social Justice and Gender Equility: Rethinking Development Strategies and Macroeconomic Policies, Berik, Günseli, van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana and Zammit, Ann (ed.), 2008, New York: Routledge.
  59. Sancar, S. Erkeklik: Impossible Power: Men in the Family, the Market and the Street, Istanbul: Metis, 2009. (in Turkish).
  60. Sallan Gül, S. Feminization of Poverty in Turkey. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 38(1), 2005, pp.25-45. (in Turkish).
  61. Riggs, David S., Caulfield, Marie B., and Street, A. E. Risk for Domestic Violence: Factors Associated with Perpetration and Victimization. Journal of Clinical Psychology 56(10), 2000, pp.1289-1316.
  62. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. How Violentare American Families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and Other Studies, In Family Abuse Its Consequences: New Directions in Research, Finkelhor, Daniv, Kirkpatrick, John T., and Straus, Murray A. (ed.,) 1988, Sage.
  63. Straus, M. A. Victims and Aggressors in Marital Violence. Am Behav Sci 23, 1980, pp.681-704.
  64. Nikolaos, D., and Alexandros, G. The Effect of Socio-Economic Determinants on Crime Rates: an Empirical Research in the Case of Greece with Cointegration Analysis. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research 2(2), 2009, pp.51-64.
  65. Lombardo, R., and Falcone, M. Crime and Economic Performance. A Cluster Analysis of Panel Data on Italy’s NUT3 Regions. Working Papers 201112, Universita della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza-DESF, 2011.
  66. Andresen, M. A. Unemployment and Crime: a Neighborhood Level Panel Data Approach. Social Science Research 41, 2012, pp.1615-28.
  67. Gelles, R. J., and Conte, J. R. Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse of Children: a Review of Research in the Eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52, 1990, pp.1045-1058.
  68. Castro, R., Peek-Asa, C., and Ruiz, A. Violence Againts Women in Mexico: A Study of Abuse Before and During Pregnancy. American Journal of Public Health 93, 2003, pp.1110-1116.
  69. Eisikovitz, Z.,Winstok, Z., and Fishman, G. The First Israeli National Survey on Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women 10, 2004, pp.729-748.
  70. Markowitz, F. E. Socieconomic Disadvantage and Violence: Recent Research on Culture and Neighborhood Control as Explanatory Mechanism. Aggression and Violent Behavior 8, 2003, pp.145-154.
  71. Aşkın, E. Ö., and Aşkın, U. The Relationship Between Domestic Violence Against Women and Poverty: A Study on Women Victims of Domestic Violence. Cappadocia Academic Overview 1(2), 2018, pp.16-37. (in Turkish).
  72. Yüksel-Oktay, E. Turkey’s and the World’s Common Problem: Violence Against Women. Journal of Academic Research 64, 2015, pp.57-118. (in Turkish).
  73. Taş, N., Doğan, A., and Önder, E. Determination of the Effects of Unemployment, Non-Performing Loan and Divorce Rate Variables on the Number of Crimes: Regional Panel Data Analysis for Turkey. Journal of Niğde University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 7(1), 2014, pp.13-35. (,n Turkish).
  74. Kavaklı, K. C. Women’s Murders and the Interaction Between Gender (In)Equality and Economic Development: a Subnational Analysis in Turkey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2020, pp.1-22.
  75. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  76. Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., and Xiao, B. A Powerful Test for Linearity When the Order of Integration is Unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 12(3), 2008, Article 2.
  77. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  78. Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., and Xiao, B. A Powerful Test for Linearity When the Order of Integration is Unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 12(3), 2008, Article 2.
  79. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  80. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  81. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  82. Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., and Xiao, B. A Powerful Test for Linearity When the Order of Integration is Unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 12(3), 2008, Article 2.
  83. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  84. Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., and Xiao, B. A Powerful Test for Linearity When the Order of Integration is Unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 12(3), 2008, Article 2.
  85. Leybourne, S., Newbold, P., and Vougas, D. Unit Roots and Smooth Transitions. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19(1), 1998, pp.83-97.
  86. Leybourne, S., Newbold, P., and Vougas, D. Unit Roots and Smooth Transitions. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19(1), 1998, pp.83-97.
  87. Harvey, D., and Mills, T. Unit Roots and Double Smooth Transitions. Journal of Applied Statistics 29(5), 2002, pp.675-83.
  88. Leybourne, S., Newbold, P., and Vougas, D. Unit Roots and Smooth Transitions. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19(1), 1998, pp.83-97.
  89. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., and Snell, A. Testing for Cointegration in Nonlinear Smooth Transition Error Correction Models. Econometric Theory 22(2), 2006, pp.279-303.
  90. Banerjee, P., Arčabićb, V., and Lee, H. Fourier ADL Cointegration Test to Approximate Smooth Breaks with New Evidence from Crude Oil Market. Economic Modelling 67(C), 2017, pp.114–24.
  91. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., and Snell, A. Testing for Cointegration in Nonlinear Smooth Transition Error Correction Models. Econometric Theory 22(2), 2006, pp.279-303.
  92. Banerjee, P., Arčabićb, V., and Lee, H. Fourier ADL Cointegration Test to Approximate Smooth Breaks with New Evidence from Crude Oil Market. Economic Modelling 67(C), 2017, pp.114–24.
  93. Harvey, D., and Leybourne, S. Testing for Time Series Linearity. Econometrics Journal 10(1), 2007, pp.149–65.
  94. Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., and Xiao, B. A Powerful Test for Linearity When the Order of Integration is Unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 12(3), 2008, Article 2.
  95. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., and Snell, A. Testing for Cointegration in Nonlinear Smooth Transition Error Correction Models. Econometric Theory 22(2), 2006, pp.279-303.
  96. Banerjee, P., Arčabićb, V., and Lee, H. Fourier ADL Cointegration Test to Approximate Smooth Breaks with New Evidence from Crude Oil Market. Economic Modelling 67(C), 2017, pp.114–24.
  97. Ertürk, Y. Violence Without Borders, The Phenomenon of Violence against Women in Paradigm, Politics and Practice, Istanbul: Metis Publications, 2015. (in Turkish).
  98. Engelen, P. J., Lander, M., and Essen, M. V. What Determines Crime Rates? An Empirical Test of Integrated Economic and Sociological Theories of Criminal Behavior. The Social Science Journal 53 (21), 2016, pp.247-62.
Language: English
Page range: 86 - 103
Published on: Dec 16, 2023
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2023 Gülgün Çiğdem, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.