Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Why is the Teleological Argument so Popular?

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Aristotle. Metaphysics, In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
  2. Aristotle. On the Soul, In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
  3. Assman, J. Monotheism and Polytheism, In S.I. Johnston (ed.), Religions of the Ancient World: A Guide. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
  4. Bast, F, and H. Tahilramani. Public Acceptance of Evolution in India. J Sci Temper 81 (2), 2018, pp. 24-38.
  5. Bealer, G. “A Priori” Knowledge and the Scope of Philosophy. Philos Stud 81 (2), 1996, pp. 121-142.
  6. Brogaard, B. Do We Perceive Natural Kind Properties? Philos Stud 162 (1), 2013, pp. 35-42.
  7. Brown, C. M. The Design Argument in Classical Hindu Thought. Int J Hindu Stud 12 (2), 2008, pp. 103-151.
  8. Collins, R. The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe, In W. L. Craig and J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.
  9. Crick, F. What Mad Pursuit. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
  10. Dawkins, R. Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.
  11. De Cruz, H, and J. De Smedt. Paley’s iPod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology. Zygon 45 (3), 2010, pp.665-685.
  12. Georgakakis, C., and L. Moretti. Cognitive Penetrability of Perception and Epistemic Justification, In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019.
  13. Goodman, N. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
  14. Griffel, F. Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  15. Harvey, G. Animism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
  16. Helton, G. Recent Issues in High-level Perception. Philos Compass 11 (12), 2016, pp. 851-862.
  17. Hume, D. and T. Beauchamp (ed.). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  18. Järnefelt, E., C. F. Canfield, and D. Kelemen. The Divided Mind of a Disbeliever: Intuitive Beliefs About Nature as Purposefully Created Among Different Groups of Non-Religious Adults. Cognition 140, 2015, pp. 72-88.
  19. Kelemen, D. The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children. Cognition 70 (3), 1999, pp. 241-272.
  20. Kelemen, D., J. Rottman, and R. Seston. Professional Physical Scientists Display Tenacious 10 Teleological Tendencies: Purpose-based Reasoning as a Cognitive Default. J Exp Psychol Gen. 142 (4), 2013, pp. 1074-1083.
  21. Leung, Y. Gratitude to the Ultimate Reality in Zhu Xi: A Case Suggesting How God can be a Fitting Target of Prepositional Gratitude. Philosophia Online, 2022, pp. 1-16.
  22. Lombrozo, T., D. Kelemen, and D. Zaitchik. Inferring Design: Evidence of a Preference for Teleological Explanations in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease. Psychol Sci 18 (11), 2007, pp. 999-1006.
  23. Lupfer, M. B., D. Tolliver, and M. Jackson. Explaining Life-Altering Occurrences: A Test of the “God-of-the-Gaps” Hypothesis. J Sci Study Relig 35 (4), 1996, pp. 379-391.
  24. Nanay, B. Do We Sense Modalities With Our Sense Modalities. Ratio 24 (3), 2011, pp. 299-310.
  25. Paley, W. Natural Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  26. Pew. Religion in Latin America: Widespread Change in a Historically Catholic Region, 2014. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2014/11/Religion-in-Latin-America-11-12-PM-full-PDF.pdf
  27. Pew. The Evolution of Pew Research Center’s Survey Questions About the Origins and Development of Life on Earth, 2019. https://www.pewforum.org/2019/02/06/the-evolution-of-pew-research-centers-survey-questions-about-the-origins-and-development-of-life-on-earth/
  28. Pew. The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, 2013. https://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-science-and-popular-culture/
  29. Plato. Republic. In J. M. Cooper and D. S. Hutchinson (eds.), Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.
  30. Ratzsch, D. Perceiving Design. In N. A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. New York: Routledge, 2003.
  31. Ratzsch, D., and J. Koperski. Teleological Arguments for God’s Existence. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/teleological-arguments/
  32. Recker, D. How to Confuse Organisms With Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design. Zygon 45 (3), 2010, pp. 647-664.
  33. Richardson, D. R. A Survey of Students’ Notions of Body Function as Teleologic or Mechanistic. Am J Phsyiology 258 (6), 1990, p. 8019.
  34. Rottman, J., L. Zhu, W. Wang, R. Seston Schillaci, K. J. Clark, and D. Kelemen. Cultural Influences on the Teleological Stance: Evidence from China. Relig Brain Behav 7 (1), 2017, pp. 17-26.
  35. Sánchez Tapia, I., S. A. Gelman, M. A. Hollander, E. M. Manczak, B. Mannheim, C. Escalante. Development of Teleological Explanations in Peruvian Quechua-Speaking and U.S. English-Speaking Preschoolers and Adults. Child Dev 87 (3), 2016, pp. 747-758.
  36. Siegel, S. The Visual Experience of Causation. Philos Q 59 (236), 2009, pp. 519-540.
  37. Stover, S. K., and M. L. Mabry. Influences of Teleological and Lamarckian Thinking on Student Understanding of Natural Selection. Bioscene J Coll Biol Teach 33 (1), 2007, pp. 11-18.
  38. Swinburne, R. The Existence of God. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  39. Trommler, F., H. Gresch, and M. Hammann. Students’ Reasons for Preferring Teleological Explanations. Int J Sci Educ 40 (2), 2018, pp. 159-187.
  40. Tye, M. Consciousness, Color, and Content. MIT Press, 2000.
  41. Van Eyghen, H. Are Design Beliefs Safe? Stud Humana 8 (1), 2019, pp. 75-83.
  42. Xenophon. Memorabilia. In E. C. Marchant and O. Todd (eds.), Memorabilia, Oeconomicus, Symposium, Apology. Harvard University Press, 1923.
  43. YouGov. The Origins of Humans, 2010. http://cdn.yougov.com/today_uk_import/YG-Archives-Pol-Prospect-Evolution-181110.pdf
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 12
Published on: Dec 16, 2023
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2023 Marcus W. Hunt, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.