Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predicting the Consequences of Perceived Data Privacy Risks on Consumer Behaviour: An Entropy-TOPSIS Approach Cover

Predicting the Consequences of Perceived Data Privacy Risks on Consumer Behaviour: An Entropy-TOPSIS Approach

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. 1. Abidin, M. Z., Rusli, R., and Shariff, A. M. Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)-entropy Methodology for inherent Safety Design Decision Making tool. Procedia Engineering, 148, 2016, pp. 1043–1050. https://doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.58710.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.587
  2. 2. Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., and Loewenstein, G. Privacy and Human Behavior in the age of Information. Science, 347, 2015, pp. 509–514. https://doi:10.1126/science.aaa146510.1126/science.aaa1465
  3. 3. Acquisti, A., Sleeper, M., Wang, Y., Wilson, S., Adjerid, I., Balebako, R., and Schaub, F. Nudges for Privacy and Security. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(3), 2017, pp. 1–41. https://doi:10.1145/305492610.1145/3054926
  4. 4. Adam J., Ulf-Dietrich R., Tom B., Carina B., and Paine S. Privacy, Trust, and Self-disclosure Online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 2010, pp. 1-24. https://doi:10.1080/0737002090356662.10.1080/07370020903586662
  5. 5. Albahri, A. S., Hamid, R. A., Albahri, O.S, Albahri, A.S. and Zaidan, A.A. Detection-based prioritisation: Framework of Multi-laboratory Characteristics for Asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers based on integrated Entropy–TOPSIS methods. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 101983. 2021. https://doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.10198310.1016/j.artmed.2020.101983
  6. 6. Alhakami, A. S., and Slovic, P. A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 1994, pp. 1085–1096.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x
  7. 7. Alshurideh, M., Nicholson, M., and Xiao, S. The Effect of Previous Experience on Mobile Subscribers’ Repeat Purchase Behaviour. European Journal of Social Sciences, 30(3), 2012, pp. 366-376.
  8. 8. Analytics Insight. Data protection vs. Cybersecurity: why you need both. 2020. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.analyticsinsight.net/data-protection-vs-cyber-security-why-you-need-both/
  9. 9. Awad, N. F., and Krishnan, M. S. The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization. MIS Quarterly, 2006, pp. 13-28. https://doi:10.2307/2514871510.2307/25148715
  10. 10. Baker Hosetler, Is Your Organization Compromise Ready? Data Security Incident. 2016. Response Report. Retrieved September 3, 2021, from https://www.bakerlaw.com/files/uploads/Documents/Privacy/2016-Data-Security-Incident-ResponseReport.pdf
  11. 11. Bansal, G. and Gefen, D. The Impact of Personal Dispositions on Information Sensitivity, Privacy Concern and Trust in Disclosing Health Information Online. Decision support systems, 49(2), 2010, pp. 138-150. https://doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.01010.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010
  12. 12. Barari, M., Ross, M., and Surachartkumtonkun, J. Negative and Positive Customer Shopping Experience in an Online Context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 2020. https://doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.10110.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101985
  13. 13. Bélanger, F., and Crossler, R. E. Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 2011, pp.1017-1041. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971
  14. 14. Belanger, F. and Hiller, J. S. A Framework for E-Government: Privacy Implications. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 2006, pp. 48–60. https://doi:10.1108/1463715061064375110.1108/14637150610643751
  15. 15. Belanger, F., Hiller, J. S., & Smith, W. J. Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Privacy, Security, and Site Attributes. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 2002, pp. 245 – 270. https://doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00018-510.1016/S0963-8687(02)00018-5
  16. 16. Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Kobrin, S. J., and Lohse, G. L. International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers. The Information Society, 20(5), 2004, pp. 313 – 324.10.1080/01972240490507956
  17. 17. Bleier, A., and Eisenbeiss, M. The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 2015, pp. 390–409. https://doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.00110.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001
  18. 18. Bornschein, R., Schmidt, L., and Maier, E. The Effect of Consumers’ Perceived Power and Risk in Digital Information Privacy: The Example of Cookie Notices. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(2), 2020, pp. 135–154. https://doi:10.1177/074391562090214310.1177/0743915620902143
  19. 19. Bugeja, J., Jacobsson, A., and Davidsson, P. On privacy and Security Challenges in Smart Connected Homes. European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC). 2016. https://doi:10.1109/eisic.2016.04410.1109/EISIC.2016.044
  20. 20. Conner, M. and Armitage, C. J. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1998, pp. 1429–1464. https://doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
  21. 21. Culnan, M. J. and Armstrong, P. K. Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 1999, pp. 104–115. https://doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.10410.1287/orsc.10.1.104
  22. 22. Culnan, M. J., and Bies, R. J. Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 2003, pp. 323–342. https://doi:10.1111/1540-4560.0006710.1111/1540-4560.00067
  23. 23. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 1989, pp. 982–1003. https://doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.98210.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  24. 24. Deloitte. Enterprise@Risk: Privacy & Data Protection Survey. 2007, Retrieved from http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/us_risk_s%26P_2007%20Privacy10Dec2007final.pdf.
  25. 25. Dinev, T. and Hart, P. Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 2005, pp. 7–29. https://doi:10.2753/jec1086-441510020110.2753/JEC1086-4415100201
  26. 26. Dinev, T., and Hart, P. An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 2006, pp. 61–80. https://doi:10.1287/isre.1060.008010.1287/isre.1060.0080
  27. 27. Dontov, T. Why Data Protection, and Cybersecurity can’t be Separate Functions. 2020, November 25, Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2020/11/25/why-dataprotection-andcybersecurity-cant-be-separate-functions/?sh=7fad4b2517cc
  28. 28. Federal Trade Commission. Data Brokers: A call for transparency and accountability. FTC. 2014. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/data-brokers-call-transparencyaccountability-report-federal-trade-commission-may-2014/140527databrokerreport.pdf
  29. 29. Fortes, N. and Rita, P. Privacy Concerns and Online Purchasing Behaviour: Towards an Integrated Model. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 22(3), 2016, pp. 167–176. http://doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.04.00210.1016/j.iedeen.2016.04.002
  30. 30. Gomez, J., Pinnick, T., and Soltani, A. Know Privacy: The Current State of Web Privacy, Data Collection, and Information Sharing, 2009. School of Information, University of California Berkeley (http://www.knowprivacy.org/).
  31. 31. Guhr, N., Werth, O., Blacha, P. P. H., and Breitner, M. H. Privacy Concerns in the Smart Home Context. SN Applied Sciences, 2(2), 2020, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2025-8
  32. 32. Hill, R. J., Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 1977, pp. 244. http://doi:10.2307/206585310.2307/2065853
  33. 33. Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., and Meckel, M. (2014). Digital Natives or Digital Immigrants? The Impact of User Characteristics on Online Trust. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), pp. 138-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.995538
  34. 34. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: A State of the Art Survey. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 186(1), 1981.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_1
  35. 35. Jeff Smith, H., Dinev, T. and Xu, H. Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(4), 2011, pp. 989–1015.10.2307/41409970
  36. 36. Jensen, C., Potts, C., and Jensen, C. Privacy Practices of Internet Users: Self-reports Versus Observed Behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(1-2), 2005, pp. 203–227.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.019
  37. 37. Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D. and Fleisch, E. Blissfully Ignorant: The Effects of General Privacy Concerns, General Institutional Trust, and Affect in the Privacy Calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 2015, pp. 607–635. http://doi:10.1111/isj.1206210.1111/isj.12062
  38. 38. Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L. and Rao, H. R. A Trust-Based Consumer Decision-Making Model in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Trust, Perceived Risk, and Their Antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 2008, pp. 544–564. http://doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.00110.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001
  39. 39. Kim, K. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/2019/12/19/your-smartphone-mobile-device-may-recording-everything-you-say/4403829002/ 2019, December, 19
  40. 40. Kothari, C.R. Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers. 2004.
  41. 41. Kuanchin Chen and Alan I. Rea Jr. Protecting Personal Information Online: A Survey of User Privacy Concerns and Control Techniques, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(4), 2004, pp. 85-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2004.11647599
  42. 42. LaRose, R., and Rifon, N. Your Privacy is Assured of Being Disturbed: Websites with and without Privacy Seals. New Media & Society, 8(6), 2006, pp. 1009–1029.10.1177/1461444806069652
  43. 43. Leidner, D. E., and Kayworth, T. A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly, 2006, pp. 357-399. http://doi:10.2307/2514873510.2307/25148735
  44. 44. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., and Agarwal, J. Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 2004, pp. 336 – 355. http://doi:10.1287/isre.1040.003210.1287/isre.1040.0032
  45. 45. Martin, K. The Penalty for Privacy Violations: How Privacy Violations Impact Trust Online. Journal of Business Research, 82, 2018, pp. 103–116. http://doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.03410.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.034
  46. 46. Martin, K. D., Borah, A., and Palmatier, R. W. Data privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 2017, pp. 36–58. http://doi:10.1509/jm.15.049710.1509/jm.15.0497
  47. 47. Martin, K., and Shilton, K. Why Experience Matters to Privacy: How Context-based Experience Moderate’s Consumer Privacy Expectations for Mobile Applications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 2015, pp. 1871–1882. http://doi:10.1002/asi.2350010.1002/asi.23500
  48. 48. Mathieson, K. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 1991, pp. 173–191. http://doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.17310.1287/isre.2.3.173
  49. 49. Meinert, D. B., Peterson, D. K., Criswell, J. R., and Crossland, M. D. Privacy Policy Statements and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 4(1), 2006, pp. 1–17. http://doi:10.4018/jeco.200601010110.4018/jeco.2006010101
  50. 50. Metzger, M. J. Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 9(4), 2004, JCMC942.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00292.x
  51. 51. Miltgen, C. L., Henseler, J., Gelhard, C. and Popovič, A. Introducing New Products that affect Consumer Privacy: A Mediation Model. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 2016, pp. 4659–4666. http://doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.01510.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.015
  52. 52. Miyazaki, A. D., and Fernandez, A. Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 2001, pp. 27–44.10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00101.x
  53. 53. Moradian, M., Modanloo, V., & Aghaiee, S. Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Material Selection of Brake Booster Valve Body. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 6(5), 2019, pp. 526-534. http://doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2018.02.00110.1016/j.jtte.2018.02.001
  54. 54. Nigeria Data Protection Regulation. Retrieved from https://ndpr.nitda.gov.ng/Content/Doc/NigeriaDataProtectionRegulation.pdf 2019.
  55. 55. Norberg, P. A., and Horne, D. R. Privacy Attitudes and Privacy-related Behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 24(10), 2019, pp. 829–847. http://doi:10.1002/mar.2018610.1002/mar.20186
  56. 56. Nowak, G. J., & Phelps, J. Direct Marketing and the Use of Individual-level Consumer Information: Determining How and When “Privacy” Matters. Journal of Direct Marketing, 9(3), 1995, pp. 46–60. http://doi:10.1002/dir.400009030710.1002/dir.4000090307
  57. 57. Pavlou, P. A., and Gefen, D. Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-based Trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 2004, pp. 37–59. http://doi:10.1287/isre.1040.001510.1287/isre.1040.0015
  58. 58. Peter, J. P., and Tarpey Sr, L. X. A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies. Journal of consumer research, 2(1), 1975, pp. 29-37. http://doi:10.1086/20861310.1086/208613
  59. 59. Phelps, J., Nowak, G., and Ferrell, E. Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 2000, pp. 27–41. http://doi:10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941.10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941
  60. 60. Privacy and Data Security Update. Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved October 3, 2021, from https://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy-data-security-update-2014 2014.
  61. 61. Protection of Personal Information Act. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/3706726-11act4of2013protectionofpersonalinforcorrect.pdf 2021
  62. 62. Roszkowska, E. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models by applying the TOPSIS Method to Crisp and Interval Data, Multiple Criteria Decision Making (6), 2011, pp. 200-230.
  63. 63. Salehi, V., Zarei, H., Shirali, G. A., and Hajizadeh, K. An Entropy-based TOPSIS Approach for Analyzing and Assessing Crisis Management Systems in Petrochemical Industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 104241. 2020. http://doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2020.10424110.1016/j.jlp.2020.104241
  64. 64. Schoenbachler, D. D. and Gordon, G. L. Trust and Customer Willingness to Provide Information in Database-Driven Relationship Marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 2002, pp. 2–16. http://doi:10.1002/dir.1003310.1002/dir.10033
  65. 65. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons. 2013.
  66. 66. Sheehan, K. B. and Hoy, M. G. Dimensions of Privacy Concern Among Online Consumers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 2000, pp.62–73. http://doi:10.1509/jppm.19.1.62.1694910.1509/jppm.19.1.62.16949
  67. 67. Smith, H. J. Information Privacy and Marketing: What the U.S. Should (and Shouldn’t) Learn from Europe. California Management Review, 43(2), 2001, 8–33.10.2307/41166073
  68. 68. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J. and Burke, S. J. Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 1996, pp. 167.10.2307/249477
  69. 69. Taber, K. S. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education. 2017.10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  70. 70. Tang, Z., Hu, Y. U. and Smith, M. D. Gaining Trust Through Online Privacy Protection: Self-Regulation, Mandatory Standards, or Caveat Emptor. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 2008, pp. 153-173.10.2753/MIS0742-1222240406
  71. 71. Tatum, H. Your Data and Privacy. Ask Help Desk: No, Your Phone Isn’t Listening to Your Conversations. (2021, November 12). Seriously [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/12/phone-audio-targeting-privacy/
  72. 72. Tavakol, M. and Dennick, R. Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 2011, pp. 53–55. http://doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  73. 73. Tsai, J. Y., Egelman, S., Cranor, L., and Acquisti, A. The Effect of Online Privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 2011, 254–268. http://doi:10.1287/isre.1090.026010.1287/isre.1090.0260
  74. 74. Wakefield, R. The Influence of User Affects in Online Information Disclosure. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(2), 2013, pp.157–174. http://doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.01.00310.1016/j.jsis.2013.01.003
  75. 75. World Economic Forum. The Global Information Technology Report Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/WEF_GITR_Full_Report.pdf 2016.
  76. 76. Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., and Hart, P. Examining the Formation of Individual’s Information Privacy Concerns: Toward an Integrative View, in Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Information Systems, Paris, France, 14-17, 2008. Retrieved from https://faculty.ist.psu.edu/xu/papers/conference/icis08a.pdf
  77. 77. Xu, H., Teo, H.-H., Tan, B. C. Y., and Agarwal, R. The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-based Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 2009, pp. 135–174. http://doi:10.2753/mis0742-122226030510.2753/MIS0742-1222260305
  78. 78. Zou, Z., Yun, Y., and Sun, J. Entropy Method for Determination of Weight of Evaluating Indicators in Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation for Water Quality Assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5), 2006, pp. 1020–1023. http://doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(06)60032-610.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 48
Published on: Jul 9, 2022
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Sulaimon Olanrewaju Adebiyi, Gloria Amaka Olayemi, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.