Religious Intuitions and the Nature of “Belief”
References
- 1. Aarnio, K., Lindeman, M. Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different?
Journal of Individual Differences 28 (1), 2007, pp. 1-9. - 2. Bagozzi, R. P., Tybout, A. M., Craig, C. S., & Sternthal, B. The construct validity of the tripartite classification of attitudes,
Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 1979, pp. 88-95. - 3. Banerjee, K., Bloom, P. “Everything happens for a reason”: Children’s beliefs about purpose in life events,
Child Development 86 (2), 2015, pp. 503-518. - 4. Bargh, J. A., Chartrand, T. L. The unbearable automaticity of being,
American Psychologist 54 (7), 1999, pp. 462-479. - 5. Barrett, J. L., Keil, F. C. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts,
Cognitive Psychology 31 (3), 1996, pp. 219-247. - 6. Barrett, J. L., Lanman, J. A. The science of religious beliefs,
Religion 38 (2), pp. 109-124. - 7. Barsalou, L. W. Grounded cognition,
Annual Review of Psychology 59, 2008, pp. 617-645. - 8. Bem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena,
Psychological review 74 (3), 1967, pp. 183–200. - 9. Bering, J.
The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life , WW Norton & Company, 2011. - 10. Bering, J. M. Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary.
Journal of Cognition and Culture 2 (4), 2002, pp. 263-308. - 11. Bering, J. M. The folk psychology of souls,
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5), 2006, pp. 453-498. - 12. Bering, J. M., Bjorklund, D. F. The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity,
Developmental Psychology 40 (2), 2004, pp. 217-233. - 13. Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. K. Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends,
Human Nature 16 (4), 2005, pp. 360-381. - 14. Bloom, P. Religion is natural,
Developmental Science 10 (1), 2007, pp. 147-151. - 15. Breckler, S. J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (6), 1984, pp. 1191-1205. - 16. Chatterjee, S. Hindu pilgrimages, pp. 269–279, In A. Wilder-Smith, E. Schwartz, & M. Shaw (eds.),
Travel medicine: Tales behind the science , Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2007. - 17. Chen, S., Chaiken, S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context,
Dual-process theories in social psychology 15, 1999, pp. 73-96. - 18. Connors, M. H., Halligan, P. W. A cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map,
Frontiers in Psychology 5, 2015, p. 1588. - 19. Devine, P. G. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1), 1989, pp. 5-18. - 20. Dijksterhuis, A., Nordgren, L. F. A theory of unconscious thought,
Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2), 2006, pp. 95-109. - 21. Farias, M. et al. Supernatural belief is not modulated by intuitive thinking style or cognitive inhibition,
Scientific Reports 7 (1), 2017, p. 15100. - 22. Fazio, R. H. Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength,
Social Cognition 25 (5), 2007, pp. 603-637. - 23. Festinger, L.
A theory of cognitive dissonance , vol. 2, Palo Alto, CA, US: Stanford University Press, 1962. - 24. Fuller, C. J.
Camphor flame: Popular Hinduism and society in India , Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004. - 25. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change,
Psychological Bulletin 132 (5), 2006, pp. 692-731. - 26. Gawronski, B., De Houwer, J. Implicit measures in social and personality psychology, pp. 283-310, In H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd (eds.),
Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - 27. Gendler, T. S. Alief and belief,
The Journal of Philosophy 105 (10), 2008, pp. 634-663. - 28. Gervais, W. M. Religious cognition, pp. 81-105, In V. Saroglou (ed.),
Religion, personality, and social behavior , Psychology Press, 2013. - 29. Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief,
Science 336 (6080), 2012, pp. 493-496. - 30. Gervais, W. M., et al. Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
Judgment and Decision Making 13 (3), 2018, pp. 268-274. - 31. Gomes, C. M., McCullough, M. E. The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment,
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6), 2015, e94-e104. - 32. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes,
Psychological Review 102 (1), 1995, pp. 4-27. - 33. Guthrie, S. E.
Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion , New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. - 34. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason, unpublished manuscript, 2000.
- 35. Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey,
PLOS ONE 7 (9), 2012, e45457. - 36. Hall, L., Johansson, P., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., & Deutgen, T. Magic at the marketplace: Choice blindness for the taste of jam and the smell of tea,
Cognition 117 (1), 2010, pp. 54-61. - 37. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. The role of action representations in visual object recognition,
Experimental Brain Research 174 (2), 2006, pp. 221-228. - 38. Heywood, B. T., Bering, J. M. “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically,
Religion, Brain & Behavior 4 (3), 2014, pp. 183-201. - 39. Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults,
Cognition 140, 2015, pp. 72-88. - 40. Jong, J. Explaining Religion (Away?),
Sophia 52 (3), 2013, pp. 521-533. - 41. Jong, J. Beliefs are Object-Attribute Associations of Varying Strength,
Contemporary Pragmatism 15 (3), 2018, pp. 284-301. - 42. Kelemen, D., Rosset, E. The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults,
Cognition 111 (1), 2009, pp. 138-143. - 43. Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default,
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (4), 2013, pp. 1074-1083. - 44. Keysar, A., Navarro-Rivera, J. A world of atheism: Global demographics, pp. 553–586, In S. Bullivant, M. Ruse (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of atheism , Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. - 45. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (1), 2012, pp. 4-21. - 46. Lebreton, L. C., Van der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B., Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans,
Nature Communications 8, 2017, p. 15611. - 47. Lindeman, M., Heywood, B., Riekki, T., & Makkonen, T. Atheists become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things,
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 24 (2), 2014, pp. 124-132. - 48. Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose,
Cognition 134, 2015, pp. 63-76. - 49. Maclean, K.
Pilgrimage and power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765–1954, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008. - 50. Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Tsakiris, M. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition,
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (1), 2015, pp. 6-12. - 51. McKay, R. T., Dennett, D. C. Our evolving beliefs about evolved misbelief,
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6), 2009, pp. 541-561. - 52. McLaughlin, O., Somerville, J. Choice blindness in financial decision making,
Judgment and Decision Making 8 (5), 2013, pp. 561-572. - 53. Moors, A., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. In search of a measure that qualifies as implicit: Recommendations based on a decompositional view of automaticity, pp. 19-35, In B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (eds.),
Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications , New York, NY: Guilford, 2010. - 54. Nisbett, R. E., Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes,
Psychological Review 84, 1977, pp. 231–259. - 55. Nosek, B. A. Implicit–explicit relations.
Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (2), 2007, pp. 65-69. - 56. Oman, D. Defining religion and spirituality, pp. 23-47, In R. F. Paloutzian, C. L. Park (eds.),
Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.), New York: Guilford, 2013. - 57. Pechey, R., Halligan, P. W. Exploring the folk understanding of belief: Identifying key dimensions endorsed in the general population,
Journal of Cognition and Culture 12 (1-2), 2012, pp. 81-99. - 58. Pennycook, G., Cheyne J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit,
Judgment and Decision Making 10 (6), 2015, pp. 549-563. - 59. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief,
Cognition 123 (3), 2012, pp. 335-346. - 60. Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis,
PLOS ONE 11 (4), 2016, e0153039. - 61. Pew Center on Religion and Public Life.
The Global Religious Landscape , Washington D.C.: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 2012. - 62. Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience,
Cognition 127 (1), 2013, pp. 31-37. - 63. Randolph-Seng, B., Nielsen, M. E. Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations,
The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 17 (4), 2007, pp. 303-315. - 64. Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (Yales studies in attitude and communication), Oxford, England: Yale University Press, 1960.
- 65. Rozin, P., Nemeroff, C. Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics”, pp. 201-216, In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (eds.),
Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment , New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. 2002. - 66. Salancik, G. R., Conway, M. Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (5), 1975, pp. 829-840. - 67. Sanchez, C., Sundermeier, B., Gray, K., & Calin-Jageman, R. J. Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief,
PLOS ONE 12 (2), 2017, e0172636. - 68. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.
Psychological Science 18(9), 2007, pp. 803-809. - 69. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God,
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (3), 2012, pp. 423-428. - 70. Smith, S., Alogna, V. K., Balkcom, E. R., Halberstadt, J. B., & Bering, J. M.
Challenges of religious skepticism: Do extinctivists fear a visit from the dead? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Portland, OR, USA. - 71. Sosis, R., Alcorta, C. Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior,
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews 12 (6), 2003, pp. 264-274. - 72. Sperber, D. Intuitive and reflective beliefs,
Mind & Language 12 (1), 1997, pp. 67-83. - 73. Stepper, S., Strack, F. Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (2), 1993, pp. 211-220. - 74. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5), 1988, pp. 768-777. - 75. Tucker, M., Ellis, R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions,
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (3), 1998, pp. 830-846. - 76. Wells, G. L., Petty, R. E. The effects of over head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses,
Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1 (3), 1980, pp. 219-230. - 77. Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose,
Cognition 129 (2), 2013, pp. 379-391. - 78. Zuckerman, P. Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns, pp. 47–66, In M. Martin (ed.),
The Cambridge companion to atheism , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2019-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2299-0518
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 68
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Victoria K. Alogna, Jesse Bering, Evan Balkcom, Jamin Halberstadt, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.