Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus

Timothy D. Knepper

doi:10.2478/sh-2014-0006

Abstract

Is the Dionysian God, or an experience of the Dionysian God, absolutely ineffable? Does the Dionysian corpus assert or perform such ineffability? This paper will argue that the answer to each of these questions is no. The Dionysian God is known hyper-nous as the hyper-ousia cause of all. And the Dionysian corpus unambiguously refers to, asserts of, and metaphorizes about this God just so. In arguing these points, this paper will call upon both the speech act theory of John Searle and the metaphor theory of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. More particularly, it will look to Searle’s rules of reference and predication and conditions of illocutionary acts, as well as Lakoff and Johnson’s schematization of metaphor gestalt and entailment to show how Dionysian expressions of inexpressibility are rule-governed and the Dionysian God is thereby (relatively) effable.

References

1. de Andia, Ysabel. Henosis: L’Union à Dieu chez Denys l’Aréopagite. New York: E.J. Brill, 1996.10.1163/9789004320963
Search in Google Scholar
2. Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Search in Google Scholar
3. Carabine, Deirdre. The Unknown God: Negative Theology in the Platonic Tradition: Plato to Eriugena. Louvain: W.B. Eerdmans, 1975.
Search in Google Scholar
4. Corbin, Michel. “Négation et Transcendance dans l’OEuvre de Denys.” Revue Des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 69 (1985): 41-76.
Search in Google Scholar
5. Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2
Search in Google Scholar
6. Eco, Umberto. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9
Search in Google Scholar
7. Golitizin, Alexander. “Suddenly Christ: The Place of Negative Theology in the Mystagogy of Dionysius Areopagites.” In Mystics: Presence and Aporia, eds. Michael Kessler and Christian Sheppard, 8-37. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar
8. Grady, Joseph. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services, 1997.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Henle, Paul. “Mysticism and Semantics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (1949): 116-122.10.2307/2104047
Search in Google Scholar
10. Horn, Laurence R. A Natural History of Negation. Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar
11. Jones, John D. “Introduction.” In The Divine Names and Mystical Theology. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980.
Search in Google Scholar
12. Knepper, Timothy. “Not Not: The Method and Logic of Negation in the Dionysian Corpus,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2008): 619-637.10.5840/acpq200882447
Search in Google Scholar
13. Knepper, Timothy. “Ranks Are Not Bypassed; Rituals Are Not Negated.” Modern Theology. forthcoming.
Search in Google Scholar
14. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Search in Google Scholar
15. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
Search in Google Scholar
16. Liddell, George, and Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon, revised edition of new (ninth) edition. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1968.
Search in Google Scholar
17. Plato. Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997.
Search in Google Scholar
18. Proudfoot, Wayne. Religious Experience. New York: University of California Press, 1985.
Search in Google Scholar
19. Pseudo-Dionysius. Corpus Dionysiacum I: De Divinis Nominibus. Ed. Beate Regina Suchla. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.
Search in Google Scholar
20. Pseudo-Dionysius. Corpus Dionysiacum II: De Coelesti Hierarchia, de Ecclesiastic Hierarchia, de Mystica Theologia, Epistulae. Eds. Günter Heil and Adolf Martin Ritter. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991.
Search in Google Scholar
21. Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. Translated by Colm Luibheid. Mahwah, New York: Paulist Press, 1987.
Search in Google Scholar
22. Rist, J.M. “Mysticism and Transcendence in Later Neoplatonism.” Hermes 92 (1964): 213-225.
Search in Google Scholar
23. Searle, John. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.10.1017/CBO9780511609213
Search in Google Scholar
24. Searle, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.10.1017/CBO9781139173452
Search in Google Scholar
25. Searle, John. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1969.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Search in Google Scholar
26. Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_5
Search in Google Scholar
27. Van den Berg, R. M. Proclus’ Hymns: Essays, Translations, Commentaries. Boston: Brill, 2001.10.1163/9789047401032
Search in Google Scholar
28. Vanneste, Jan. Le mystère de dieu: Essai sur la structure rationnelle de la doctrine mystique du pseudo-Denys l’Aréopagite. Brussels: Desclée de Brouwer, 1959.
Search in Google Scholar

Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus

Abstract

Paradigm

My account