Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stochastic numerical approach to the bearing capacity of adjacent footings on spatially variable soils Cover

Stochastic numerical approach to the bearing capacity of adjacent footings on spatially variable soils

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The scheme of the impact of adjacent foundations on each other.

Figure 2

The adopted numerical model.

Figure 3

Node displacement results for a deterministic task with foundation spacing 0.9–8 m.

Figure 4

Analytical and numerical results for deterministic values of soil parameters for each approach: (a) ideal cohesive, (b) purely frictional, and (c) TBC.

Figure 5

Normalised analytical and numerical results for deterministic values of soil parameters for each approach: (a) ideal cohesive, (b) purely frictional, and (c) TBC.

Figure 6

Mean BC for probabilistic values of soil parameters for each approach: (a) ideal cohesive, (b) purely frictional, and (c) TBC.

Figure 7

BC COV for probabilistic values of soil parameters for each approach: (a) perfectly cohesive, (b) purely frictional, and (c) TBC.

Figure 8

Performance efficiency factor for all approaches (A1 – Approach 1 – perfectly cohesive; A2 – Approach 2 – purely frictional; A3 – Approach 3 – TBC).

Figure 9

Probability of failure. (a and b) Approach 1 – perfectly cohesive soil, (c and d) Approach 2 – purely frictional soil, and (e and f) Approach 3 – cohesive-frictional soil (TBC).

Soil parameters for non-cohesive approach_

Mean valueStandard deviationDistributionDistribution parameters
Cohesion (c)1 kPaDeterministic
Friction angle ( ϕ \phi )35°Bounded ϕ min = 25 ° {\phi }_{\min }\hspace{1em}=25^\circ
Unit weight ( γ \gamma )19 kN/m3 Deterministic ϕ max = 45 ° {\phi }_{\max }\hspace{1em}=45^\circ

Soil parameters for a perfectly cohesive approach_

Mean valueStandard deviationDistribution
Cohesion (c)36.3 kPa19.6 kPaLognormal
Friction angle ( ϕ \phi )Deterministic
Unit weight ( γ \gamma )Deterministic

Analytical values of resistance for each design approach_

Analytical formulaBC value for B = 1 mBC value for B = 2 m
Approach 1 – perfectly cohesive soil q a = 5.12 c u {q}_{a}=5.12\hspace{0.25em}{c}_{u} 185.86 kPa185.86 kPa
Approach 2 – purely frictional soil q a = q N q + 0.5 B γ N γ {q}_{a}=q{N}_{q}+\hspace{0.25em}0.5B\gamma {N}_{\gamma } 1108.41 kPa1538.08 kPa
Approach 3 – cohesive-frictional soil q a = c N c + q N q + 0.5 B γ N γ {q}_{a}=c{N}_{c}+q{N}_{q}+0.5B\gamma {N}_{\gamma } 697.43 kPa734.77 kPa

Soil parameters for the cohesive-friction soil approach (TBC)_

Mean valueStandard deviationDistributionDistribution parameters
Cohesion (c)36.3 kPa19.6 kPaLognormal
Friction angle ( ϕ \phi )20° Bounded ϕ min = 5 ° {\phi }_{\min }=5^\circ
Unit weight ( γ (\gamma )19 kN/m3 Deterministic ϕ max = 35 ° {\phi }_{\max }=35^\circ
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2026-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 75
Submitted on: Apr 8, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 10, 2026
Published on: May 18, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Joanna M. Pieczyńska-Kozłowska, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.