Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of Raft in the Analysis of Granular Piles Cover

Influence of Raft in the Analysis of Granular Piles

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

(a) Layout of a cluster consisting of four floating granular piles (GPs) arranged symmetrically. (b) Sectional elevation at X–X of a cluster comprising four symmetrically positioned floating GPs (Garg and c, 2019).
(a) Layout of a cluster consisting of four floating granular piles (GPs) arranged symmetrically. (b) Sectional elevation at X–X of a cluster comprising four symmetrically positioned floating GPs (Garg and c, 2019).

Figure 2:

Stresses on any ith element of the GP.
Stresses on any ith element of the GP.

Figure 3:

Four floating GPRs units
Four floating GPRs units

Figure 4:

Soil stresses in the four floating GPR units
Soil stresses in the four floating GPR units

Figure 5:

Numerical integration discretization scheme for GP.
Numerical integration discretization scheme for GP.

Figure 6:

Discretization scheme of solid raft (Solanki et al., 2022).
Discretization scheme of solid raft (Solanki et al., 2022).

Figure 7:

Variation of α2r, with Kgp, between 2GPs and 2GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2.
Variation of α2r, with Kgp, between 2GPs and 2GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2.

Figure 8:

Variation of α3r, with Kgp, between the 3GPs and 3GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2.
Variation of α3r, with Kgp, between the 3GPs and 3GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2.

Figure 9:

Variation of α4r, with Kgp, between 4GPs and 4GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2.
Variation of α4r, with Kgp, between 4GPs and 4GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2.

Figure 10:

Variation of α3GPRs, with Kgp, between the 3GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2, R and S analyses.
Variation of α3GPRs, with Kgp, between the 3GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2, R and S analyses.

Figure 11:

Variation of α3GPs, with Kgp, between 3GPs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10, R and S analyses.
Variation of α3GPs, with Kgp, between 3GPs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10, R and S analyses.

Figure 12:

Variation of α4GPRs, with Kgp, between 4GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2, R and S analyses.
Variation of α4GPRs, with Kgp, between 4GPRs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10 and D/d = 2, R and S analyses.

Figure 13:

Variation of α4GPs, with Kgp, between 4GPs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10, R and S analyses.
Variation of α4GPs, with Kgp, between 4GPs—impact of s/d for L/d = 10, R and S analyses.

Figure 14: (a)

α2r v/s s/d, between 2GPRs and 2GPs—impact of Kgp for L/d = 10 and D/d=2.
α2r v/s s/d, between 2GPRs and 2GPs—impact of Kgp for L/d = 10 and D/d=2.

Figure. 14 (b):

α3r v/s s/d, between 3GPRs and 3GPs—impact of Kgp for L/d = 10 and D/d=2.
α3r v/s s/d, between 3GPRs and 3GPs—impact of Kgp for L/d = 10 and D/d=2.

Figure 14: (c)

α4r v/s s/d, between 4GPRs and 4GPs—impact of Kgp for L/d = 10 and D/d=2.
α4r v/s s/d, between 4GPRs and 4GPs—impact of Kgp for L/d = 10 and D/d=2.

Figure 15 (a):

Changes in PR, PP, and PB with respect to total load with Kgp for 2GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.
Changes in PR, PP, and PB with respect to total load with Kgp for 2GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.

Figure 15 (b):

Changes in PR, PP, and PB with respect to total load with Kgp for 3GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.
Changes in PR, PP, and PB with respect to total load with Kgp for 3GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.

Figure 15 (c):

Changes in PR, PP, and PB with respect to total load with Kgp for 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.
Changes in PR, PP, and PB with respect to total load with Kgp for 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.

Figure 16:

Changes in PP with respect to total load with Kgp for 2GPRs, 3GPRs, and 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.
Changes in PP with respect to total load with Kgp for 2GPRs, 3GPRs, and 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.

Figure 17:

Changes in PR with respect to total load with Kgp for 2GPRs, 3GPRs, and 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.
Changes in PR with respect to total load with Kgp for 2GPRs, 3GPRs, and 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.

Figure 18:

Changes in PB with respect to total load with Kgp, for groups of 2GPRs, 3GPRs, and 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.
Changes in PB with respect to total load with Kgp, for groups of 2GPRs, 3GPRs, and 4GPRs—impact of s/d = 3 and 4 for L/d = 10 and D/d = 3.

Validation and comparison of α for groups of two, three, and four GP–GPR systems_

PARAMETERSSETTLEMENT INTERACTION FACTOR, αREFERENCES
L/d=10, s/d=3, νs= 0.5, Kgp=100000.494Present analysis for 2GPs
L/d=10, s/d=3, νs= 0.5, Kgp=∞0.493Poulos (1968)
L/d=25, s/d=3, νs= 0.5, Kgp=100000.584Present analysis for 2GPs
L/d=25, s/d=3, νs= 0.5, Kgp=∞0.582Poulos (1968)
L/d=25, s/d=3, νs= 0, Kgp=100000.631Present analysis for 2GPs
L/d=25, s/d=3, νs= 0, Kgp=∞0.630Poulos (1968)
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs=0.5, Kgp=100000.299Present analysis for 2GPs
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs=0.5, Kgp=10000.26Kitiyodom and Matsumoto (2003)
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs=0.5, Kgp=10000.265Present analysis for 2GPs
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs= 0.5, Kgp=∞0.31Poulos (1968)
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs=0.5, Kgp=100000.596Present analysis for 3GPs
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs= 0.5, Kgp=∞0.589Poulos (1968)
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs=0.5, Kgp=100000.829Present analysis for 4GPs
L/d=25, s/d=10, νs= 0.5, Kgp=∞0.81Poulos (1968)
L/d=10, D/d=2, s/d=4, νs=0.5, Kgp=100000.42Present analysis for 2GPRs
L/d=10, D/d=2, s/d=4, νs=0.5, Kgp=∞0.41Davis and Poulos (1972)
L/d=10, D/d=2, s/d=6, νs=0.5, Kgp=100000.311Present analysis for 2GPRs
L/d=10, D/d=2, s/d=6, νs=0.5, Kgp=∞0.31Davis and Poulos (1972)
L/d=25, D/d=2, s/d=4, νs=0.5, Kgp=100000.51Present analysis for 2GPRs
L/d=25, D/d=2, s/d=4, νs=0.5, Kgp=∞0.50Davis and Poulos (1972)
L/d=25, D/d=2, s/d=6, νs=0, Kgp=100000.471Present analysis for 2GPRs
L/d=25, D/d=2, s/d=6, νs=0, Kgp=∞0.47Davis and Poulos (1972)

Calculated α Values for 2GPR, 3GPR, and 4GPR at Different Kgp Values_

KgpSsingle GPRS2GPRsα2S3GPRsα3S4GPRsα4
100.288960190.443722440.53540.577100920.99740.664992191.3012
200.249219610.378042920.5170.49096630.97070.571164721.2923
400.211465960.322154360.52370.422534690.99770.497941941.3545
600.192959140.296932310.53920.39309891.0370.466866721.4202
800.181913260.282525470.55270.376683621.07030.449655811.4722
1000.174562440.273197660.56530.366208571.09740.438718831.5138
2000.157867450.252759080.60070.343673191.17760.415313571.6311
3000.151603210.245349960.61770.335644171.21380.407016241.6848
4000.148319810.241521630.62840.331524541.23570.402767571.7154
5000.146298330.239183320.63550.329017991.24890.400185381.7365
6000.14492850.237606810.64020.327332191.25880.398449941.7517
7000.143938940.236471970.64340.326120741.26670.397203411.7627
8000.14319060.235615980.64550.32520811.27270.39626471.7703
9000.142604850.234947320.64680.324495871.27740.395532321.7757
10000.142133910.234410550.64760.323924561.28110.394944981.7797
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2025-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 145 - 166
Submitted on: Dec 17, 2024
|
Accepted on: Mar 3, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 4, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Ashish Solanki, Jitendra Kumar Sharma, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.