Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing the Impact of Varying Fines and Antistripping Agent on Moisture Susceptibility in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures Cover

Assessing the Impact of Varying Fines and Antistripping Agent on Moisture Susceptibility in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

A) Mixing of aggregates and bitumen in a mechanical mixing machine, B) loose mixture prepared for conditioning.
A) Mixing of aggregates and bitumen in a mechanical mixing machine, B) loose mixture prepared for conditioning.

Figure 2:

A) Core and trimmed specimen along with waste rings for SPT; B) core specimens for IDT.
A) Core and trimmed specimen along with waste rings for SPT; B) core specimens for IDT.

Figure 3:

A) Studs fixing using gauge point fixing device; B) clamps and LVDTs mounted on the sample.
A) Studs fixing using gauge point fixing device; B) clamps and LVDTs mounted on the sample.

Figure 4:

Measured dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.
Measured dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.

Figure 5:

IDT strength of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.
IDT strength of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.

Figure 6:

Measured resilient modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.
Measured resilient modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.

Figure 7:

Pareto plot illustrating standardized effects.
Pareto plot illustrating standardized effects.

Figure 8:

Visualization of absolute standardized effects in the half-normal plot.
Visualization of absolute standardized effects in the half-normal plot.

Figure 9:

Visualization of the standardized effect of the normal plot.
Visualization of the standardized effect of the normal plot.

Figure 10:

Main effects plot for dynamic modulus.
Main effects plot for dynamic modulus.

Figure 11.

Interaction plots for dynamic modulus.
Interaction plots for dynamic modulus.

Figure 12:

Cube plot for dynamic modulus.
Cube plot for dynamic modulus.

Figure 13:

Typical normal probability plot.
Typical normal probability plot.

Figure 14:

Typical residual versus fitted values.
Typical residual versus fitted values.

Figure 15:

Typical residual versus fitted values.
Typical residual versus fitted values.

Figure 16:

Validation plot between predicted and observed values.
Validation plot between predicted and observed values.

Job mix formula observations for mix having 3%, 6%, and 9% fines (ASTM Standard, D-3515, 2014)_

ParametersCriteriaMeasured ValueRemarks (3%/6%/9%)

3% fines6% fines9% fines
Optimum asphalt content (%)NA4.104.455.00P/P/P
VMA (%)1414.1014.1016.60P/P/P
VFA (%)65–7571.0071.0071.00P/P/P
Stability (N)8006863084658110P/P/P
Flow (mm)2.0–3.52.552.853.10P/P/P

Analysis of variance for dynamic modulus_

SourcesDFSSMSSF-testp-value
Main effects3190,552,51563,517,5051336.00.000
2-way interactions38,892,0632,964,02162.350.000
3-way interactions1464,442464,4429.770.014
Residual error8380,32247,540
Total1200,289,34147,540

Comparison of different parameters for moisture susceptibility_

Fines (%)ConditioningDynamic modulus ratio at 10 (Hz)Tensile strength ratioResilient modulus ratio

Without ASWith ASWithout ASWith ASWithout ASWith AS
3%One cycle F-T748578875687
6%One cycle F-T748180896890
9%One cycle F-T698077855186

Factor's notations and their levels for analysis_

FactorsNotationLevels
Frequency (Hz)A0.125
Fines (%)B39
ConditioningCConditionedUnconditioned

Peak load values in indirect tensile strength test_

FinesControlled unconditionedControlled conditionedAntistripped and conditioned
3%9200 (N)7200 (N)8000 (N)
6%9500 (N)7600 (N)8500 (N)
9%9100 (N)7000 (N)7700 (N)

Measured values of dynamic modulus with different percent fines and frequency_

Frequency (Hz)Fines (%)ConditioningDynamic modulus (MPa)
0.13Conditioned805
0.13Conditioned1036
0.19Conditioned1100
253Conditioned5704
253Unconditioned7474
253Conditioned6268
259Conditioned7501
0.19Conditioned845
259Unconditioned10.376
259Conditioned7091
0.13Unconditioned963
0.19Unconditioned1423
259Unconditioned10.508
253Unconditioned7124
0.13Unconditioned966
0.19Unconditioned1550

Sieve size with different percentages of fines_

Sieve sizeGradation with 3% finesGradation with 6% finesGradation with 9% fines

% Passing% Retained% Passing% Retained% Passing% Retained
3/4″100010001000
1/2″802085158614
3/8″671370137412
#4472057205420
#8281937203420
#1691917201420
#2004512595
Pan 3 6 9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2024-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 269 - 282
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jul 4, 2024
|
Published on: Aug 24, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Muhammad Tariq Bashir, Muhammad Imad, Hamza Jamal, Md. Munir Hayet Khan, Md. Alhaz Uddin, Bakht Zamin, Faizan Farid, Hamza Ahmad Qureshi, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.