Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Spatial Distribution of Geotechnical Soil Parameters in Site Investigation Cover

The Role of Spatial Distribution of Geotechnical Soil Parameters in Site Investigation

Open Access
|Jul 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

The studied site and the positions of the geotechnical investigations (source: Google Earth).
The studied site and the positions of the geotechnical investigations (source: Google Earth).

Figure 2:

Variation of physical parameters with depth.
Variation of physical parameters with depth.

Figure 3:

Variation of physical geotechnical parameters with depth.
Variation of physical geotechnical parameters with depth.

Figure 4:

Variation of physical geotechnical parameters with depth.
Variation of physical geotechnical parameters with depth.

Figure 5:

Variation of oedometric modulus, Eoed200–300 (kPa), with depth.
Variation of oedometric modulus, Eoed200–300 (kPa), with depth.

Figure 6:

Variation of shear strength parameters with depth.
Variation of shear strength parameters with depth.

Figure 7:

Spatial (2D) variation of physical geotechnical parameters with depth.
Spatial (2D) variation of physical geotechnical parameters with depth.

Figure 8:

Spatial (2D) variation of consistency index (IC, -) with depth.
Spatial (2D) variation of consistency index (IC, -) with depth.

Figure 9:

Spatial (2D) variation of percentage of clay (top), silt (middle), and sand (bottom) with depth.
Spatial (2D) variation of percentage of clay (top), silt (middle), and sand (bottom) with depth.

Figure 10:

Spatial (2D) variation of mechanical parameters with depth.
Spatial (2D) variation of mechanical parameters with depth.

Figure 11:

Geotechnical cross section.
Geotechnical cross section.

Recommended maximum values of the coefficient of variation (Vxmax) for the division into geological layers [8]_

Geotechnical parameterVx max
Unit weight, γ (kN/m3)0.05
  • Moisture content, w (%)

  • Consistency index, IC

  • Porosity index, e

  • Degree of compaction, ID (%)

0.15
Plasticity index, IP (%)0.30

Example of uniform distribution of measured values confirmed as being part of the same geotechnical layer_

Measured values of consistency index, Ic (-) 0.484
0.4880.512
0.4950.5220.540
0.5070.5380.5570.568
0.5310.5660.5820.5910.597
0.6250.6250.6250.6250.625
0.7190.6840.6680.6590.653
0.7430.7120.6930.682
0.7550.7280.710
0.7620.738
0.766
Minimum values, Xmin0.5310.5070.4950.4880.484
Maximum values, Xmax0.7190.7430.7550.7620.766
Average values, Xm0.6250.6250.6250.6250.625
Number of selected values, n357911
Standard deviation, sx0.0940.0940.0940.0940.094
Coefficient of variation, Vx0.150.150.150.150.15
kn for Vx unknown1.690.960.730.610.54
Xk sup = Xm(1 + kn Vx unknown)0.780.710.690.680.68
Xk inf = Xm(1 - kn Vx unknown)0.470.540.560.570.57
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2024-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 230 - 243
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2024
Published on: Jul 18, 2024
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Tatiana Olinic, Ernest-Daniel Olinic, Ioan Boți, Ionuț-Alexandru Ciocaniu, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.