Figure 1:

Figure 2:
![Results of push-out tests conducted by UBWM [7]: force per dowel versus relative slip for the SA, PZ, and CL shapes (the horizontal axis shows the slip displacement measured in the tests).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=40289abfbc57e1d881fd3784a02433364d15a3ea175bc7eca51257eefa0955c8&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 3:
![Cutting technology for production of test specimens for project [7]: a) and b) single cutting line for the PZ and SA shapes and c) two cutting lines for the CL shape.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_003.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=377dfcd8b763684cca687313ccfdaf0636249b01257f2898516f356a466a368d&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 4:
![The idea of the new push-out-test (NPOT) specimen proposed by the author to be used for cyclic tests [7] (2 million cycles).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_004.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=abd455c111fa6e17cad1a8026949aec09b35d8369fea42c0bf53867309a955a2&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:

Figure 8:

Figure 9:

Figure 10:
![Documentation of fatigue cracks in the NPOT-PZ2 specimen tested in of the PreCo-Beam project [7]: a–f) view after cutting the concrete part, g) general view of the crack, h) beginning of the crack, and i) end of the crack](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_010.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=237214bd58987bcc51f652ebd138824342c62b4ba6c65f3449ceda03683fe568&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 11:
![The original concept of dimensionless resistance of steel dowels regarding local and global effects [5,6] (Fig. 13d in [6]): fatigue coefficients for tension stress for PZ shape (at the left; to be compared with Fig. 20 and [22] for the clothoidal shape) and general prediction for complete stress set (at the right).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_011.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=8ae64c68a4ed4d08f3f1ab2e6c53f2f1c2a6b268630586892acf41701545202c&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 12:
![Strain gauges on NPOT specimens with CL shapes for purposes of [7].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_012.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=9f4206d8f11364a25e35c5e40edcbe99133c786f5236ca0ee194b8452119e6ce&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 13:

Figure 14:
![Summary of characteristics of the basic shapes highlighting the problems with the idea of a new cutting line and the basis standing behind this idea (original drawing of steel parts of NPOT specimens for discussions with partners of the PreCo-Beam [7] project: only the SA and PZ shapes were used in bridges before construction of the “Wierna Rzeka” Bridge in Poland [62]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_014.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=a1b953aa1a1f2d091fe1ae88dc66e5b164ae41540d2aa6ac8f80107611d87b89&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 15:

Figure 16:

Figure 17:

Figure 18:

Figure 19:
![Results of the numerical simulations of the MCL 115/250 shape (the shape after optimization of the ratio according to the procedure presented in Fig. 30 in [57]) by Abaqus software.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_019.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=2202ea0976fc8eca5a3c673eca780efbf42b365a6c654661d8eea0c546fc44ac&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 20:
![Dimensionless stress concentration factors (according to [5,6]) for the MCL 115/250 shape and the PZ 300/100 shape.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_020.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=b4b50287d636438df4df1cd5ac8ed90058e7a4d7ba0459f027471e07204a4c50&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 21:

Figure 22:
![Different shapes and technologies of production of steel dowels with the clothoidal shape: a and b) different shapes of the “nose” of steel dowels by different producers fabricated in Poland out of plates by oxy-cutting, c) small dowels fabricated in Luxembourg by plasma cutting, d) elements of the PE4 bridge design by the author in Poland [12] fabricated in Luxembourg by oxy-cutting and plasma cutting, and e) steel elements of the PE4 bridge at the construction site (a large number of elements were produced with the MCL 115/250 shape).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_022.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=1e7d85e138d355d136ccbcdf5d3cf3d06bbcffd999d133b6f97e5176827628f2&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 23:

Figure 24:

Figure 25:
![Implementation of composite dowels in innovative composite bridges in Poland: a) and b) implementation in beams – bridge in Elbląg (presented in [41]) and c) implementation in arches – a new solution as part of a network arch bridge using composite dowels [63].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_025.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=18e970def3d04fe26a17897b9b271f5171a89a81fa21efbf49a9d5e7a7f6a1c9&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 26:
![Nominal geometry of the modified clothoidal shape of a single connector MCL 100/250 according to [16] given as a function of the spacing of connectors ex.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2024-0005_fig_026.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T052327Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=4e295037a41159d8f180c092585b447e565f89d095a20848a3a9f2820e30f29a&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Main stress values (MPa) in the NPOT models estimated using FEA for coarse mesh density – the stress level is given at the minimum (σP = 120 kN) and maximum (σP = 280 kN) load level and their difference (ΔσP = 160 kN)_
| σP = 120 kN | ΔσP = 160 kN | σP = 280 kN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL | 132.0 | 176.0 | 308.0 |
| SA | 134.6 | 179.4 | 314.0 |
| PZ | 157.6 | 210.2 | 367.8 |