Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of Soft Soil Samples Quality on the Compressibility and Undrained Shear Strength – Seven Lessons Learned From the Vistula Marshlands Cover

Influence of Soft Soil Samples Quality on the Compressibility and Undrained Shear Strength – Seven Lessons Learned From the Vistula Marshlands

By: Jakub Konkol  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Schematic presentation of soft soil sample quality influence on (a) compressibility behavior and (b) undrained shear strength (Note: σv′ = effective vertical stress; ɛv = axial strain; σp′ = preconsolidation pressure; q = deviatoric stress according to Cambridge notation; p′ = effective mean stress according to Cambridge notation; p0′ = initial mean stress; CSL = critical state line).
Schematic presentation of soft soil sample quality influence on (a) compressibility behavior and (b) undrained shear strength (Note: σv′ = effective vertical stress; ɛv = axial strain; σp′ = preconsolidation pressure; q = deviatoric stress according to Cambridge notation; p′ = effective mean stress according to Cambridge notation; p0′ = initial mean stress; CSL = critical state line).

Figure 2:

Vistula Marshlands, Northern Poland.
Vistula Marshlands, Northern Poland.

Figure 3:

Soil sample quality according to different rating systems for peats (a,b,c), organic clay (d,e,f), and organic silt (g,h,i).
Soil sample quality according to different rating systems for peats (a,b,c), organic clay (d,e,f), and organic silt (g,h,i).

Figure 4:

Relationships between different SQD criteria for peats (a,b,c), organic clay (d,e,f), and organic silt (g,h,i).
Relationships between different SQD criteria for peats (a,b,c), organic clay (d,e,f), and organic silt (g,h,i).

Figure 5:

Influence of sample quality on oedometric modulus and compression index.
Influence of sample quality on oedometric modulus and compression index.

Figure 6:

Local relations of (a) Cc, (b) Cs, (c) Cs/Cc and (d) Cα with ρd0
Local relations of (a) Cc, (b) Cs, (c) Cs/Cc and (d) Cα with ρd0

Figure 7:

(a) Raw oedometer results (lab selected seating stress level is the reference one; usually approx. 5 kPa) and (b) “corrected” plots due to soil sample disturbance (in situ stress level is the reference one, here 100 kPa).
(a) Raw oedometer results (lab selected seating stress level is the reference one; usually approx. 5 kPa) and (b) “corrected” plots due to soil sample disturbance (in situ stress level is the reference one, here 100 kPa).

Figure 8:

General picture of undrained shear strength of soft soil in Vistula Marshlands: (a) UUC test results, (b) FVT tests, and (c) specific location values (Jazowa testing site).
General picture of undrained shear strength of soft soil in Vistula Marshlands: (a) UUC test results, (b) FVT tests, and (c) specific location values (Jazowa testing site).

Figure 9:

Different estimates of cu for Jazowa site.
Different estimates of cu for Jazowa site.

Jazowa testing site—different cu estimates_

Sample noType (Δe/e0)Sampling/Testing depth [m]Soil typeTest methodcu [kPa]Ratecu normalized to 1%/h (1) [kPa]
1In situ (B)8orSiUUC24.270%/h18.9
2In situ (B)9orSiUUC27.370%/h21.3
3In situ (B)10orSiUUC28.270%/h22.1
4In situ (B)10orSiUUC29.370%/h22.9
5In situ (N/A)8.5orSiFVT30.7(2)0.1°/s (700%/h)30.7(2)
6In situ (N/A)9orSiFVT30.1(2)0.1°/s (700%/h)30.1(2)
7In situ (N/A)9orSiFVT28.5(2)0.1°/s (700%/h)28.5(2)
8In situ (N/A)10orSiFVT33.5(2)0.1°/s (700%/h)33.5(2)
9Reconstituted (A)9orSiCK0UC32.71%/h32.7
10Reconstituted (A)9orSiCK0UC29.31%/h29.3
11Reconstituted (A)9orSiDSS27.220%/h22.8
12Reconstituted (A)9orSiDSS29.320%/h24.5

Variability of constrained modulus and compression index for second group of soils (samples No_ 4, 5, and 9)_

Sample no.Eoed [kPa]Eoedcorr [kPa]Cc100–200kPa [−]Cc200–400kPa [−]ρd0 [g/cm3]Cceq.(5) [−]RE [%]
4294926790.2390.2151.1960.28318.4
5331130580.2130.2031.2160.26926.3
9312529050.2430.2911.1890.28818.6
AVG312828810.2320.236---
SD1471550.0130.039---
COV0.050.050.060.16---

Variability of constrained modulus and compression index for first group of soils (samples No_ 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8)_

Sample noEoed [kPa]Eoedcorr [kPa]Cc100–200kPa [−]Cc200–400kPa [−]ρd0 [g/cm3]Cceq.(5) [ −]RE [%]
1146813040.6010.5570.9730.51114.9
2134211250.7880.6870.8110.7830.5
3156513510.5250.4341.0370.43217.7
69838431.1411.0770.7280.97614.4
711759730.9510.8160.6731.12718.6
8146212400.5830.5360.9820.49914.4
AVG133211400.7640.684---
SD1981810.2210.213---
COV0.140.160.290.31---

Natural variability of the organic silt samples for oedometric tests_

Sample noBoring noSample depth [m]Test methodwc [%]ρ [g/cm3]Gs [−]Notes
1O310.5–1124h IL50.61.462.58Sample few cm to no.2
2O310.5–1124h IL59.91.292.58Sample few cm to no.1
3O19.5–1024h IL51.41.572.57O1 borehole is at distance of 10 m from O2
4O29.5–1024h IL42.91.712.54O2 borehole is at distance of 10 m from O1
5O39.3–9.824h IL48.01.802.58
6O310–10.524h IL91.01.392.46Very variable water content and plasticity of soil in the tube
7O410–10.524h IL103.51.372.26Very variable water content and plasticity of soil in the tube
8O410.5–1124h IL55.81.532.52-
9O29.5–10CRS*41.21.682.57-

Vistula Marshlands soft soils basic physical properties_

Physical/index propertiesSoilStandard

Organic clayOrganic siltPeat
LOI10%<LOI<30%5%<LOI<10%LOI>30%ASTM D2974 or PN-ISO 10694
Fines~50% of Cl and Si~95% of SiN/ALaser diffraction method
wc63.5±21.045.5±18.5261±110.4ASTM D2216 or PN-EN ISO 17892-1
ρ1.58±0.161.74±0.181.17±0.27ASTM D854 or PN-EN ISO 17892-2
Gs2.61±0.062.60±0.062.04±0.32ASTM D7263 or PN-EN ISO 17892-3
LL82.5±32.152.0±21.0268.9±115.7ASTM D4318 or PN-EN ISO 17892-12
IP50.1±25.129.4±13.8159.4±87.5ASTM D4318 or PN-EN ISO 17892-12
Casagrande's chartAlong and above A-lineAbove A-lineN/AASTM D2487 or PN-EN ISO 14688-2

Organic clay—different estimates of cu (location No_ 3)_

Sample no.Type (SQD)Sampling/Testing depth [m]Soil typeTest methodcu [kPa]Rate
1In situ (D)9–10orSiCK0UC26.41%/h
2In situ (D)9–10orSiCK0UC32.71%/h
4N/A9–10orSiSHANSEP25±5.2N/A

Soil specimens used in soil sample quality evaluation_

SQD (Terzaghi et al., 1966)Δe/e0 criteria (Lunne et al., 1997)Cr/Cc (deJong et al., 2018)

ɛvol at σ′vo[%]SQD classOCR 1–2OCR 2–4RatingCr/CcRating
<1A<0.04<0.03v. good to excellent (A)<0.15High
1–2B0.04–0.070.03–0.05good to fair (B)0.15–0.4Moderate
2–4C0.07–0.140.05–0.1Poor (C)>0.4Low
4–8D>0.14>0.1Very poor (D)--
>8E-----

Organic clay—different estimates of cu (location No_ 2)_

Sample no.Type (Δe/e0)Sampling/Testing depth [m]Soil typeTest methodcu [kPa]Rate
1In situ (D)*2–3orClCK0UC17.01%/h
2In situ (D)*2–3orClCK0UC23.41%/h
3In situ (D)*2–3orClCK0UE15.21%/h
4N/A2–3orClSHANSEP18.2±9.5N/A
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 262 - 281
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2023
Published on: Sep 30, 2023
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Jakub Konkol, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.