Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An elastoplastic constitutive model for assessing ground settlements induced by deep excavations Cover

An elastoplastic constitutive model for assessing ground settlements induced by deep excavations

Open Access
|Sep 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Yield surface in the principal stress space.
Yield surface in the principal stress space.

Figure 2:

Section of the yield surface in the deviatoric plane.
Section of the yield surface in the deviatoric plane.

Figure 3:

Calibration of the HCD model on tests B1, B2, and B3.
Calibration of the HCD model on tests B1, B2, and B3.

Figure 4:

Calibration of the HCD model on tests C2 and C3.
Calibration of the HCD model on tests C2 and C3.

Figure 5:

Calibration of the HCD model on tests E1, E2, and E3.
Calibration of the HCD model on tests E1, E2, and E3.

Figure 6:

Calibration of the HCD model on the monotonic drained triaxial test on alluvial material.
Calibration of the HCD model on the monotonic drained triaxial test on alluvial material.

Figure 7:

Calibration of the HCD model on the drained triaxial test with unloading cycles on alluvial material.
Calibration of the HCD model on the drained triaxial test with unloading cycles on alluvial material.

Figure 8:

Experimental setup (a) front view, (b) top view.
Experimental setup (a) front view, (b) top view.

Figure 9:

Mesh used for the simulations.
Mesh used for the simulations.

Figure 10:

Results of the calibration of the Hardening Soil Model parameters.
Results of the calibration of the Hardening Soil Model parameters.

Figure 11:

Results of the calibration of the HCD model parameters.
Results of the calibration of the HCD model parameters.

Figure 12:

Comparison of the horizontal displacements (last three stages).
Comparison of the horizontal displacements (last three stages).

Figure 13:

Comparison of the settlements behind the wall (last two stages).
Comparison of the settlements behind the wall (last two stages).

Figure 14:

Comparison of the forces in the struts (for four stages: excavation down to 3, 4, and 5 m, and surcharge).
Comparison of the forces in the struts (for four stages: excavation down to 3, 4, and 5 m, and surcharge).

Figure 15:

Comparison of the settlements behind the wall (last two stages) with a friction angle of 20° for the sand–wall interface.
Comparison of the settlements behind the wall (last two stages) with a friction angle of 20° for the sand–wall interface.

Reference parameters (calibrated on the triaxial tests) for the Hochstetten sand_

HSMEurref=63 MPa, E50ref=21 MPa, ν=0.1, m=0.5, pref=100 kPa, c=5 kPa, φ=43°, ψ=14°, Rf=0.9
HCD modelE=75 MPa, ν=0.3, Ro=0, pc=2 kPa, φult=43°, φc=29°, αo=3, b=0.0025

HCD model parameters_

Evφopcφultαoφcb

MPa °kPadeg deg
Monotonic test (confining pressure 175 kPa)570.4φmin0378270.001
Cyclic test (confining pressure 157 kPa)570.4φmin03720310.003

Parameters of the reaction wall and the sheet pile wall_

WallE(MPa)I(cm4/m)A(cm2/m)Eeq (MPa)teq (cm)
Reaction wall210,00096810624,40010
Sheet pile wall210,00011,610116680035

Results obtained with HSM (displacements in mm)_

MeasuresHSM (ref.)HSM (adj.)
Max horizontal displacement – 4 m1.831.34 (−27%)0.91 (−50%)
Max horizontal displacement – 5 m2.954.49 (+52%)2.56 (−13%)
Max horizontal displacement –surcharge3.365.80 (+73%)3.28 (−2%)
Settlement 1 m behind the wall – 5 m2.171.21 (−44%)0.80 (−63%)
Settlement 1 m behind the wall – surcharge2.804.18 (+49%)2.26 (−19%)

Summary of the triaxial tests considered in this study_

TestDepthType of soilType of test
B6.5–7Very fine silty sandConsolidated drained CD
C8.5–9.5Slightly sandy pebbles and gravelConsolidated drained CD
E13.7–14Silty clayConsolidated drained CD

Parameters of the HCD model for tests B, C, and E (σc denotes the confining pressure)_

σcEvφopcφultαoφcb

kPaMPa-°kPa°-°-
Test B1150450.2710351310.005
2250700.2710351320.008
Test C34001070.2710351330.009
22001330.11515411380.002
33502330.1271515411390.005
Test E1200160.121.260231200.004
2350450.122.260231200.005
35501120.144.260231210.015

Results obtained with the HCD model (displacements in mm)_

MeasuresHCD (ref.)HCD (adj.)
Max. horizontal displacement – 4 m1.830.86 (−53%)1.37 (−25%)
Max. horizontal displacement – 5 m2.952.53 (−14%)2.99 (+1%)
Max. horizontal displacement – surcharge3.362.86 (−14%)3.51 (+4%)
Settlement 1 m behind the wall – 5 m2.171.81 (−17%)1.81 (−17%)
Settlement 1 m behind the wall – surcharge2.802.65 (−5%)3.04 (+8%)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 231 - 245
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2023
|
Accepted on: May 13, 2023
|
Published on: Sep 21, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Hiba El-Arja, Sébastien Burlon, Emmanuel Bourgeois, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.