Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluating the Effect of Environment Acidity on Stabilized Expansive Clay Cover

Evaluating the Effect of Environment Acidity on Stabilized Expansive Clay

Open Access
|Jan 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Compositional diagram showing the approximate composition range of clay minerals.

Figure 2

Micrographs of alkali-activated clay sediments showing that activation with NaOH (a) resulted in a more porous, less dense microstructure than activation with (b) Na-silicate solution (Ferone, et al., 2015).

Figure 3

Atomic diagram of kaolinite (two layers), Image generated in VESTA (Larsen et al., 2017), using structural parameters from Bish (Bish, 1993).

Figure 4

SEM image of cement-treated clay immediately after compaction (Zhao et al., 2016).

Figure 5

X-ray diffraction of clay sample. (Quartz, Illite, Kaolinite, and Calcite).

Figure 6

The determined heat flow curves of sulfate depletion peak in (a) N and (b) OH group (Chen et al., 2018).

Table 1

Physical properties of the clay used in the study.

pHGsDry densityNatural moisture contentSoil classification (USCS)Atterberg limits
PIPLLL
7.592.714.9 kN/m320.9%CL19.7%23.8%43.5%
Table 2

Swelling rate and swelling pressure.

Soil typeSwelling pressureSwelling rateSwelling potential
CL16.15 kPa4.37%Medium
12.45 kPa2.81%Medium
8.65 kPa1.68%Medium
Table 3

Physical properties of cement.

PropertiesCompressive strengthSetting timeAutoclave expansionSpecific surface area
28 days2 daysFinalInitial
ASTM C150more than 38.5 kPamore than 7 kPaless than 6 hoursmore than 45 minutesless than 0.8%more than 2800 gr/cm2
Table 4

Chemical properties of cement.

PropertiesLoss on ignitionRemaining insolubleC3AMgOFe2O3AL2O3SiO2
ASTM C1503%0.75%8%5%6%6%20%
Table 5

The used buffer specification.

Environmental conditionDegree of acidity
Acid4
Neutral7
Alkaline10
Table 6

Specifications of water.

Chemical compounds existing in waterPpm
HCO3329.4
CL14.2
SO49.6
Ca92
Mg14.4
Na6.9
K2.3
Figure 7

Density curve of cement-stabilized and unsterilized soil.

Figure 8

Unconfined compressive strength of nonstabilized samples in various environments in terms of acidity.

Figure 9

Unconfined compressive strength of samples stabilized by 5% cement in various environments in terms of acidity.

Figure 9

Failure strain of nonstabilized samples in various environments in terms of acidity.

Figure 10

Failure strain of 5% cement-stabilized samples in various environments in terms of acidity.

Figure 11

Stress–strain curve from an oedometer test.

Figure 12

Volume change coefficient of nonstabilized samples in various environments in terms of acidity.

Figure 13

Volume change coefficient of 5% cement-stabilized samples in various environments in terms of acidity.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2022-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X (formerly 0137-124X) | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 27
Submitted on: Dec 23, 2021
Accepted on: Sep 13, 2022
Published on: Jan 25, 2023
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Saeed Ghaffarpour Jahromi, Ashkan Noori, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.