Figure 1
Sub-structure method.
Figure 2
Impedance functions.
Figure 3
Used numerical model.
Figure 4
Geometry of the numerical model.
Figure 5
Influence of the suction caisson inner diameter on the vertical dynamic impedance.
Figure 6
Influence of the suction caisson inner diameter on the horizontal dynamic impedance.
Figure 7
Vertical displacement amplitude | U/F |̶
Figure 8
Horizontal displacement amplitude | U/F |̶.
Figure 9
Vertical and horizontal response for the maximum | U/F|̶ Influence of the suction caisson diameter.
Figure 10
Variation of the vertical dynamic impedance as a function of the suction caisson length.
Figure 11
Variation of the horizontal dynamic impedance as a function of the cylinder length.
Figure 12
Vertical displacement amplitude | U/F |̶.
Figure 13
Horizontal displacement amplitude | U/F |̶.
Figure 14
Vertical and horizontal response for the maximum | U/F |̶ Influence of the cylinder depth.
Figure 15
Influence of the Young modulus on the vertical dynamic impedance.
Figure 16
Influence of the Young modulus on the variation of the horizontal dynamic impedance.
Figure 17
Vertical displacement amplitude | U/F |̶.
Figure 18
Horizontal displacement amplitude | U/F |̶.
Figure 19
Vertical and horizontal response for the maximum | U/F |̶ Influence of the suction module de young.