Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Behavior of Vertically Confined Square Footing on Reinforced Sand under Centric Inclined Loading Cover

Behavior of Vertically Confined Square Footing on Reinforced Sand under Centric Inclined Loading

Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the experimental set up.
Schematic diagram of the experimental set up.

Figure 2

Particle size distribution curve.
Particle size distribution curve.

Figure 3

Geogrid used in the experimental study as (a) confiner (b) reinforcement.
Geogrid used in the experimental study as (a) confiner (b) reinforcement.

Figure 4

Schematic presentation of footing with (a) confiner (b) confiner with reinforcements under centric inclined load.
Schematic presentation of footing with (a) confiner (b) confiner with reinforcements under centric inclined load.

Figure 5

Experimental set up for 5° angle of inclination.
Experimental set up for 5° angle of inclination.

Figure 6

Load intensity-settlement behavior of footing with confiner at 5° angle of inclination for (a) D/B=1.0 (b) D/B=1.5 (c) D/B=2.0 with variation of d/B=1.0,1.5,2.0 respectively.
Load intensity-settlement behavior of footing with confiner at 5° angle of inclination for (a) D/B=1.0 (b) D/B=1.5 (c) D/B=2.0 with variation of d/B=1.0,1.5,2.0 respectively.

Figure 7

Load intensity-settlement behavior of footing with confiner (D/B=2.0;d/B=2.0) and reinforcement (a) 5° (b) 10° (c) 20° angle of inclination.
Load intensity-settlement behavior of footing with confiner (D/B=2.0;d/B=2.0) and reinforcement (a) 5° (b) 10° (c) 20° angle of inclination.

Figure 8

Variation of ultimate load intensity with normalized (a) depth of confiner at D/B = 1.0 (b) top surface dimension of confiner at d/B = 2.0 for footing with confiner configuration.
Variation of ultimate load intensity with normalized (a) depth of confiner at D/B = 1.0 (b) top surface dimension of confiner at d/B = 2.0 for footing with confiner configuration.

Figure 9

(a) Variation of bearing capacity ratio with spacing (b) variation of settlement reduction factor with spacing, at confiner dimension (D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.0).
(a) Variation of bearing capacity ratio with spacing (b) variation of settlement reduction factor with spacing, at confiner dimension (D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.0).

Properties of sand_

Material (sand)Value
Classification of sand As per ISSCS (Indian Standard Soil ClassificationSP
Specific gravity2.64
Coefficient of curvature(Cc)1.13
Uniformity coefficient(Cu)2.62
Maximum void ratio(emax)0.87
Minimum void ratio(emin)0.55
Natural void ratio(enatural)0.68
Maximum dry unit weight (kN/m3)16.46
Minimum dry unit weight (kN/m3)13.62
Natural dry unit weight (kN/m3)15.24
Angle of shearing resistance (¢) (Direct Shear Test)32.6°
Relative Density50%

Ultimate load intensity for different footing configurations under centric inclined loading_

Footing configurationConfiner dimensionHorizontal reinforcement Spacing (Y)Load intensity (kN/m2) (i=5°)Load intensity (kN/m2) (i=10°)Load intensity (kN/m2) (i=20°)
Surface footing 35.4534.1931.80
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.0 50.0647.9833.77
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.5 59.5553.0434.94
Footing with confinerD/B = 1.0; d/B = 2.0 67.0257.4235.18
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.0 48.9146.5232.81
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.5 53.4548.5933.71
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 2.0 57.150.8134.49
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.0 46.4344.2530.56
D/B = 2.0 ; d/B = 1.5 48.6146.4930.87
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.0 50.4247.2831.15
Footing with confiner and horizontal reinforcementD/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.00.25B79.9369.6459.47
0.5B73.1362.9454.29
0.75B62.5650.8345.59
1B55.5548.4942.49
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.50.25B101.7483.1676.10
0.5B90.580.2871.39
0.75B84.3766.5757.39
1B70.960.4550.09
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 2.00.25B105.9691.5484.89
0.5B90.585.1278.49
0.75B85.7877.3469.69
1B78.4364.8251.29
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.00.25B120.20102.3083.42
0.5B96.2189.073.4
0.75B82.1376.3959.55
1B61.1059.4053.64
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.50.25B171.10146.44102.47
0.5B110.094.4277.89
0.75B82.518069.47
1B62.8061.7654.31
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 2.00.25B213.91195.31127.29
0.5B138.75118.9198.01
0.75B85.5282.673.67
1B62.806560.91
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.00.25B136.0110.53102.44
0.5B102.9191.7186.11
0.75B87.2284.2374.23
1B75.5473.457.89
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.50.25B177.62146.0114.9
0.5B123.8100.592.9
0.75B91.185.1276.38
1B80.075.2366.41
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.00.25B228.22188.57134.39
0.5B151.10143.72102.2
0.75B111.21102.6686.14
1B90.081.469.47

Comparison of SRF for different footing configurations under centric inclined loading_

Footing configurationConfiner dimensionHorizontal reinforcement Spacing (Y)SRF (i=5°)SRF (i=10°)SRF (i=20°)
Surface footing
Footing with confinerD/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.0 0.470.430.10
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.5 0.540.480.14
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 2.0 0.570.520.18
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.0 0.410.360.06
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.5 0.430.400.08
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 2.0 0.460.500.10
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.0 0.360.350.003
D/B = 2.0 ; d/B = 1.5 0.410.390.01
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.0 0.430.440.02
Footing with confiner and horizontal reinforcementD/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.00.25B0.670.630.60
0.5B0.540.530.52
0.75B0.440.430.37
1B0.390.360.31
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.50.25B0.740.640.65
0.5B0.700.600.63
0.75B0.620.500.49
1B0.530.420.41
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 2.00.25B0.860.840.78
0.5B0.710.650.64
0.75B0.630.580.58
1B0.540.460.43
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.00.25B0.800.730.68
0.5B0.660.640.59
0.75B0.560.540.52
1B0.450.350.41
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.50.25B0.890.850.73
0.5B0.780.700.66
0.75B0.640.580.55
1B0.510.460.43
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 2.00.25B0.900.860.79
0.5B0.770.730.69
0.75B0.640.590.55
1B0.590.430.42
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.00.25B0.800.790.79
0.5B0.710.710.69
0.75B0.660.640.57
1B0.610.550.49
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.50.25B0.890.830.78
0.5B0.770.770.72
0.75B0.690.680.64
1B0.620.590.51
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.00.25B0.900.880.80
0.5B0.850.800.76
0.75B0.720.710.65
1B0.600.590.52

Details of laboratory model tests,

Test seriesFoundation configurationTest parametersNumber of tests

VariableConstant
AOnly footing (surface footing)i=0,5°,10°,20° 4
BFooting with confinerd/B=1,1.5,2i= 5°,10°,20°D/B=1.09
d/B=1,1.5,2D/B=1.59
i= 5°,10°,20°d/B=1,1.5,2i= 5°,10°,20°D/B=2.09
CFooting with confiner and reinforcementd/B=1,1.5,2; N=1–8Y/B=0.25,0.5,0.75,1i=5°10°20°D/B=1.0,L/B=1, y/B=0.1B36
d/B=1,1.5,2; N=1–8Y/B=0.25,0.5,0.75,1i=5°,10°,20° d/B=1,1.5,2;D/B=1.5,L/B=1.5, y/B=0.1B36
N=1–8Y/B=0.25,0.5,0.75,1i=5°,10°,20°D/B=2.0,L/B=2.0, y/B=0.1B36

Comparison of BCRs for different footing configurations under centric inclined loading_

Footing zonfigurationConfiner dimensionHorizontal reinforcement Spacing (Y)BCR (i=5°)BCR (i=10°)BCR (i=20°)
Surface footing
Footing with confinerD/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.0 1.411.41.10
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.5 1.671.551.14
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 2.0 1.891.671.15
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.0 1.371.361.07
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.5 1.51.421.1
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 2.0 1.611.481.13
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.0 1.31.291.0
D/B = 2.0 ; d/B = 1.5 1.371.351.01
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.0 1.421.381.02
Footing with confiner and horizontal reinforcementD/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.00.25B2.252.041.95
0.5B2.061.841.73
0.75B1.761.481.49
1B1.561.411.39
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 1.50.25B2.872.432.5
0.5B2.552.352.34
0.75B2.381.951.88
1B2.001.771.64
D/B = 1.0; d/B = 2.00.25B3.002.682.78
0.5B2.552.492.57
0.75B2.422.262.28
1B2.211.901.68
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.00.25B3.393.02.74
0.5B2.712.612.41
0.75B2.312.231.95
1B1.721.731.76
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 1.50.25B4.824.293.36
0.5B3.12.762.55
0.75B2.322.332.28
1B1.771.81.78
D/B = 1.5; d/B = 2.00.25B6.035.714.18
0.5B3.913.473.21
0.75B2.412.412.42
1B1.911.92.0
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.00.25B3.833.233.36
0.5B2.92.682.82
0.75B2.452.462.43
1B2.122.141.9
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 1.50.25B5.04.273.77
0.5B3.492.933.05
0.75B2.562.482.5
1B2.252.192.18
D/B = 2.0; d/B = 2.00.25B6.435.514.41
0.5B4.254.23.35
0.75B3.133.02.82
1B2.542.382.28
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2022-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 224 - 238
Submitted on: Nov 26, 2021
Accepted on: May 20, 2022
Published on: Jul 27, 2022
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 B. Kirtimayee, Narendra Kumar Samadhiya, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.