Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Case studies on Q-slope method use for slope stability analyses Cover

Case studies on Q-slope method use for slope stability analyses

By: Eren Komurlu  
Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The Q-slope chart [1].
The Q-slope chart [1].

Figure 2

Drilling at the Kovanlik quarry site.
Drilling at the Kovanlik quarry site.

Figure 3

Shown of drilling locations (D1, D2) on the failed Kovanlik quarry.
Shown of drilling locations (D1, D2) on the failed Kovanlik quarry.

Figure 4

The Kovanlik quarry after the slope instability.
The Kovanlik quarry after the slope instability.

Figure 5

a) Drill cores taken from the Kovanlik quarry and b) investigations of the core samples.
a) Drill cores taken from the Kovanlik quarry and b) investigations of the core samples.

Figure 6

Uniaxial compressive strength testing.
Uniaxial compressive strength testing.

Figure 7

The Gure slope in Giresun city.
The Gure slope in Giresun city.

Figure 8

The Gulyali quarry in Ordu city.
The Gulyali quarry in Ordu city.

Figure 9

The Piraziz slope in Giresun city.
The Piraziz slope in Giresun city.

Ja values [1]_

DescriptionJa
(a) Rock-wall contact (no clay fillings, only coatings)
Tightly healed, hard nonsoftening, impermeable filling, i.e., quartz or epidote0.75
Unaltered joint walls, surface staining only1
Slightly altered joint walls. Nonsoftening mineral coatings, sandy particles, clay-free disintegrated rock, etc.2
Silty- or sandy-clay coatings, small clay disintegrated rock, etc.3
Softening or low friction clay mineral coatings, i.e., kaolinite or mica. Also chlorite, talc, gypsum, graphite, etc., and small quantities of swelling clays4
(b) Rock-wall contact after some shearing (thin clay fillings, probable thickness & 1–5 mm)
Sandy particles, clay-free disintegrated rock, etc.4
Strongly over-consolidated nonsoftening clay mineral fillings6
Medium or low over-consolidation, softening, clay mineral fillings8
Swelling-clay fillings, i.e., montmorillonite. Value of Ja depends on percent of swelling clay-size particles and access to water8–12
(c) No rock-wall contact when sheared (thick clay/crushed rock fillings)
Zones or bands of disintegrated or crushed rock and clay6–12
Zones or bands of silty or sandy clay, small clay fraction (nonsoftening)5
Thick, continuous zones or bands of clay13–20

Q-slope values of the case study slopes_

SlopeQ-slope value
Kovanlik0.58
Gure0.19
Gulyali12.25
Piraziz2.10

SRFa values [1]_

DescriptionSRFa
Slight loosening due to surface location, disturbance from blasting or excavation2.5
*Loose blocks, tension cracks, joint shearing, weathering susceptibility, severe blasting disturbance5
As above (*), but strong susceptibility to weathering10
Slope is in advanced stage of erosion and loosening due to erosions by water and/or ice-wedging effects15
Residual slope with significant transport of material downslope20

Jwice values [1]_

DescriptionDesert environmentWet environmentTropical stormsIce wedging
Stable structure; competent rock1.00.70.50.9
Stable structure; incompetent rock0.70.60.30.5
Unstable structure; competent rock0.80.50.10.3
Unstable structure; incompetent rock0.50.30.050.2

SRFb values [1]_

Descriptionσc1SRFb
Moderate stress-strength range50–2002.5–1
High stress-strength range10–505–2.5
Localized intact rock failure5–105–10
Crushing or plastic yield2.5–515–10
Plastic flow of strain softened material1–2.520–15

Jn values [1]_

Joint set number descriptionJn
Massive, no or few joints0.5–1
One joint set2
One joint set plus random joints3
Two joint sets4
Two joint sets plus random joints6
Three joint sets9
Three joint sets plus random joints12
Four or more joint sets, random, heavily jointed15
Crushed rock, earthlike20

Jr values [1]_

DescriptionJr
Discontinuous joints4
Rough or irregular, undulating3
Smooth, undulating2
Slickensided, undulating1.5
Rough or irregular, planar1.5
Smooth, planar1.0
Slickensided, planar0.5
Zone containing clay thick enough to prevent rock-wall contact1.0
Sandy, gravely, or crushed zone to prevent rock-wall contact1.0

SRFc values (RQD100: 1 m perpendicular sample of discontinuity, RQD300: 3 m perpendicular sample of discontinuity) [1]_

DescriptionFavorableUnfavorableVery unfavorableCausing failure if unsupported
Major discontinuity with little or no clay1248
Major discontinuity with RQD100 ≈ 0 due to clay and crushed rock24816
Major discontinuity with RQD300 ≈ 0 due to clay and crushed rock481224
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2022-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 190 - 197
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2021
Accepted on: May 4, 2022
Published on: Jul 27, 2022
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Eren Komurlu, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.