Figure 1
![An example of a retention tank (1 - inlet canal, 2 - outlet canal, 3 - flow chamber, 4 – accumulation chamber) [28].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=a478f25b78742cab9c1b468503c1b646f19293130758d321bfed83731524f7e6&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 2
![An example of an additional transit canal (1 – sewer canal, 2 - sewer manhole, 3 - additional transit canal) [28].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=573d12e00717bc22a1dad87c8ad58a76255a19690e95513976cd31b1fa1672f2&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 3
![An example of a rainwater system equipped with a retention sewage canals (1 - canal, 2 - piling partitions, 3 - manhole) [28].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_003.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=fe12b68dbbd02dd0b15aebd9d114af72c2d4718396457069b7f0910727231145&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 4
![Scheme of the damming partition installed in a sewage manhole (a) cross section; (b) longitudinal section; 1 - sewer manhole, 2 - overflow edge, 3 - piling partition, 4 - flow opening, 5 – canal, DO,RK – diameter of the flow opening, dk - diameter of canal, hRK,t – rainwater height in the canal during the time t, Hzał - maximum acceptable height of rainwater before the damming partition [9].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_004.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=d55ab485fdc9c07cdaa3fd2ecc8d727c0061213cf7986dc7911588d8c8c0c067&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 5
![Scheme of the retention sewage canal with damming partitions that create stormwater canal retention spaces (the light blue - average distribution of the liquid stream mirror in the conduits of a traditional rainwater systems; the blue - liquid stream distribution and retention capacity of the rainwater sewage system after equipping it with damming partition), LKR—distance between adjacent damming partitions [7].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_005.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=e9b81b383d654b3e9429db98a76ffb551b962453f24a136bde61085f8e77b05a&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 6
![The scheme of the model catchment, total drainage area F = 80 ha (developed based on [1]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_006.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=f235dbe1ee02ab2c6ff8ee7855b8ed2d5fd20f9cb28ccb0247df82b635ec6631&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 7
![Maximum rainwater outflow at the outlet from the drainage catchment for traditional storm water system QoTmax and innovative storm water system QoImax, catchment area F = 80 ha (developed on the basis of [1]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_007.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=609daac7b6cd606567e2345c6a6e0417e43c0772075d03e0388ae49e7f2a0796&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 8
![Hydrograms of rainwater outflow from the traditional and innovative sewer system at rainfall duration td = 25 minutes, drainage catchment area F = 80 ha, canal bottom slope ik = 2 ‰ and surface runoff coefficient Ψ = 0,5 [1].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_008.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=ccfdbc4a5ef65bdcd1f36984929700c2dd76dc90ad0bd04199b0fbc74c8e9c1f&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 9
![Calculative time for rainwater sewage system dimensioning tm and calculative time for innovative rainwater sewage system dimensioning tM (based on [1]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_009.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=7a417b84b34b8f90298919def5a86b18424cdd13aa7534aca2b7be86829ad748&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 10
![Values of the coefficient of γTM depending on the sewer slope ik and spacing of damming partitions LKR (based on [1]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_010.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=032ea935ffd641efe4f581d1a4e5673744a2e24d12f57fe39cff73707ef427d3&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 11
![Rainwater flow reduction coefficient βKR in innovative rainwater system for different slopes of canals ik and damming baffle spacing LKR (based on [1]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_011.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=e1be0ea9507044ff6caef6124dfcea9c43e8cab957489118bdbfa8f32d51e0fc&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 12
![The relationship between the rainwater flow reduction coefficient βKR and the critical time tM (based on [1]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647379aa4e662f30ba53f878/j_sgem-2021-0037_fig_012.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T124924Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=cd9c0fefdd5f8baaa86a94fd296ee90b6ead7caa176157014cfc3f23b3c3d90c&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
A set of basic hydraulic parameters of the traditional rainwater system_
| The traditional rainwater sewage system | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Conception | Slope of canals bottom | Maximum value of rainwater outflow from the traditional rainwater sewer at outlet node | Calculative time for rainwater sewage system dimensioning | 
| - | - | ik, ‰ | QoTmax, dm3/s | tm, min | 
| 1. | Conception I | 1 | 2887.7 | 32 | 
| 2. | Conception II | 2 | 3692.8 | 26 | 
| 3. | Conception III | 3 | 4175.8 | 25 | 
A Set of the values of the basic hydraulic parameters of the innovative rainwater sewage with retention canals system_
| The innovative rainwater sewage system (traditional sewage system after installation of damming baffles) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Conception | Considered variant | Slope of canals bottom | Maximum value of rainwater outflow from the innovative rainwater sewer at outlet node | Calculative time for innovative rainwater sewage system dimensioning | Damming baffles spacing | Rainwater flow reduction coefficient | 
| - | - | - | ik, ‰ | QoImax, dm3/s | tM, min | LKR, m | βKR, - | 
| 1. | Conception I | Variant 1 with LKR1 | 1 | 981.6 | 88 | 200 | 0.34 | 
| 2. | Variant 2 with LKR2 | 1 | 1063.4 | 84 | 300 | 0.37 | |
| 3. | Variant 3 with LKR3 | 1 | 1159.6 | 78 | 400 | 0.40 | |
| 4. | Conception II | Variant 1 with LKR1 | 2 | 1775.1 | 56 | 200 | 0.48 | 
| 5. | Variant 2 with LKR2 | 2 | 2120.8 | 46 | 300 | 0.57 | |
| 6. | Variant 3 with LKR3 | 2 | 2362.8 | 42 | 400 | 0.64 | |
| 7. | Conception III | Variant 1 with LKR1 | 3 | 2445.3 | 40 | 200 | 0.59 | 
| 8. | Variant 2 with LKR2 | 3 | 2899.5 | 34 | 300 | 0.69 | |
| 9. | Variant 3 with LKR3 | 3 | 3118.8 | 30 | 400 | 0.75 | |
A comparison of rainwater outflow from traditional and innovative sewer system taking into account different variants of their working_
| Ratio of maximum rainwater outflow traditional to innovative system, at various slope of canals bottom ik and damming baffles spacing RLK | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ik = 1 ‰ | ik = 2 ‰ | ik = 3 ‰ | LKR, m | 
| 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.7 | LKR1 = 200 m | 
| 2.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | LKR2 = 300 m | 
| 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.3 | LKR3 = 400 m | 
Comparison of calculative time tm and tM for different variants of sewer system working_
| The slope of canals bottom | Calculative time for rainwater sewage system dimensioning | Calculative time for innovative rainwater sewage system dimensioning | The difference between the calculative duration of rainfall for the dimensioning of the traditional rainwater system tm and the sewage equipped with a retention canals system tM | Damming baffles spacing | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ik, ‰ | tm, min | tM, min | ΔT, min | LKR, m | 
| 1 | 32 | 88 | 56 | LKR1 = 200 m | 
| 1 | 32 | 84 | 52 | LKR2 = 300 m | 
| 1 | 32 | 78 | 46 | LKR3 = 400 m | 
| 2 | 26 | 56 | 30 | LKR1 = 200 m | 
| 2 | 26 | 46 | 20 | LKR2 = 300 m | 
| 2 | 26 | 42 | 16 | LKR3 = 400 m | 
| 3 | 25 | 40 | 15 | LKR1 = 200 m | 
| 3 | 25 | 34 | 9 | LKR2 = 300 m | 
| 3 | 25 | 30 | 5 | LKR3 = 400 m |