Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical analysis of tailing dam with calibration based on genetic algorithm and geotechnical monitoring data Cover

Numerical analysis of tailing dam with calibration based on genetic algorithm and geotechnical monitoring data

By: Szczepan Grosel  
Open Access
|Nov 2020

References

  1. Cała M, Flisiak J. Slope stability analysis with numerical and limit equilibrium methods. Burczynski, Fedelinski i Majchrzak (eds) Computermethods in mechanics, CMM-2003.
  2. Gioda G, Sakurai S. Back analysis procedures for the interpretation of field measurements in geomechanics. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1987, 11(6), 555–583. doi:10.1002/nag.1610110604
  3. Holland J. Adaptation In Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975.
  4. Hunter JD. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9,2007, 90–95.
  5. Jamiolkowski M. Soil mechanics and the observational method: challenges at the Zelazny Most copper tailings disposal facility. Géotechnique, 2014, 64(8), 590–618. doi:10.1680/geot.14.rl.002.
  6. McKinney W. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 2010, 51–56.
  7. Oliphant TE. A guide to NumPy, USA: Trelgol Publishing 2006.
  8. Papon A., Riou Y., Dano C., Hicher PY. Single-and multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization for identifying soil parameters. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2011, 36(5), 597–618. doi:10.1002/nag.1019.
  9. Peck RB. Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Geotechnique 1969, 19, No. 2, 171–187.
  10. Rokonuzzaman M., Sakai T. Calibration of the parameters for a hardening–softening constitutive model using genetic algorithms. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(4), 573–579. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.02.007.
  11. Simo, J. C, Rifai, M. S. A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1990, 29(8), 1595–1638. doi:10.1002/nme.1620290802
  12. Vahdati P, Levasseur S, Mattsson H, Knutsson S. Inverse Mohr-Coulomb soil parameter identification of an earth and rockfill dam by genetic algorithm optimization. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 18. 5419–5440.
  13. Vahdati P, Levasseur S, Mattsson H, Knutsson S. Inverse hardening soil parameter identification of an earth and rockfill dam by genetic algorithm optimization. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 19. 3327–3349.
  14. Van Genuchten M. A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44.
  15. Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 Reference Manual. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace, 2009.
  16. Whitley, D. A Genetic Algorithm Tutorial. Statistics and Computing. 1998
  17. Whitley D, Starkweather T. Genitor II: a distributed genetic algorithm. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1990, 6, 367–388
  18. Zentar R, Hicher PY, Moulin G. Identification of soil parameters by inverse analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 2001, 28(2), 129–144. doi:10.1016/s0266-352x(00)00020-3.
  19. Zimmermann T, Truty A, Urbański A, Podleś K. ZSoil user manual. Zace Services, Switzerland 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2020-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 47
Submitted on: Jul 23, 2020
|
Accepted on: Sep 21, 2020
|
Published on: Nov 24, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Szczepan Grosel, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.