Figure 1

Figure 2
![Scheme of groundwater flow to the DMT membrane (DMTC) and assumed segment of sphere (Garbulewski et al., [21]).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647378714e662f30ba53f7c9/j_sgem-2019-0021_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKHYYZXNQQ%2F20260316%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260316T064640Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAUaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJGMEQCICrNj5kbI3WvLeSq%2BLTLfK%2FVuuoQ8bSpkMXYXtubm33sAiA4Mccc9t0Bi6VRYs4viaAkiuifN4xi8NoqxE3fewR6wirEBQjO%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F8BEAIaDDk2MzEzNDI4OTk0MCIMATe4HuWuXJlLf9zKKpgFqmUuvOrYGusNuQQEu9kBjQrG2wGjXhBoP988PBk6blw4%2F20%2FR0MbZNg0y4%2BrfDd6UMFiDIHdvoqN6VFYBTTEt9tkYnTrYP7J4pOGzogIiPzL3yRJ13x69Rl4P482OLe9PXL7JYIxRh2KHdNldXz02CH9%2B206fKsfe%2Bd6i9R%2B8Fr%2BzaBSXd6eHmhWcj53EPX9CDunV9X2wx7yxkvPqL0JW8bp90GIHCMxMKpAbo8MAKMtdj8JZDLRRNrvs0uYbdr%2BZ19WbKvPY%2Fmy2OiqtxPoMT%2BPJYTJ%2BoKouSJm6xeUK8UYXkO079z2IiexJg2ovtXfnaoizYwsKxdyLEA7QVCA87EvB4CcjiW%2BU1SewlStAub69la0r4mWNp7vnzb7YB1Ewp4%2FkUxaIjaQ%2B6PEp5MlhnwZjjcToJ9IS%2Bz%2BQwu%2Bf%2BMj6epM7u6Z7ILqv9Ax4J5PElCdcrJm7whWVxfuaGHRSc4V4Tie%2F00%2BTf9B4Vu1CGzsdFjDtsKohO0hdUfp5kDSq5SRHqMkxVi85GQPH8fiVAAjRt1AzvFCx855YCsa1Aw0fYeBTMjJqH8KOLEtLy%2F%2F9bAQL7m%2BAcYjxSagmGTRQNFEqNYU%2Br4icEfPIcrbKFNKFTTDfdnXcnpfT94Jdiuqf7nJchKSrQDykjbSuTddhp%2Bgrjc5QO%2BHSF%2Fc25xbR2KEFxfToqyd%2B3U4irXc%2FckrSLeBy1X1qsNdK5YnBOzL0uCaRxVaAMoBm%2FNQHD3tckPY59InAt%2BE7ZPVzLbpi2t8TKWMDpN08L%2BPzC8Yno0A79b%2Fzva2o%2FAcn2MZ14%2FHglwyMvvUg%2BWyAWc5Uc%2FjIqyiIB5O9wANV5rLHkneTSfRTJVyp1wT3nGm6%2FwPvT5o83TxJ4E0w4FeDjC%2Bl97NBjqyAebK%2B4BJJJnp2j8Aws3lKpHf31IpumloaCJeoG8tQeFFKYMuXxoiY7AFUHTs6%2FWEPlDVpf8jOx2YB9IH9gej9LP6y%2FZqVEiS3RR%2BMiAFwOHe1yHigWeNdFtsOAc%2FfCKxTaQ8OeBP2vzYNqaO9XSED%2F9SpySFiSeTLCXv%2FmPx%2FolULb91DQo9j3hhZYWhq4htaATgU7q8hDV9ubnfdwhCGvJmvluBgmef%2BuyneOEEISRxdTE%3D&X-Amz-Signature=273d762d3da89e39a533827d625d370b824376e6e7a559d967c92be48339b629&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Index properties of mineral and organic soils at the Nielisz, Stegny and SGGW Campus test sites (Interrim reports [22])_
| Sites | Soil type | Organic content Iom (%) | CaCO3 content (%) | Water content wn (%) | Liquid Limit wL (%) | Unit density of Soil ρ (t/m3) | Specific density of Soil ρs (t/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nielisz | Organic mud (Mor) | 20–30 | - | 120–150 | 130–150 | 1.25–1.30 | 2.25–2.3 |
| Organic mud (Mor) | 10–20 | - | 105–120 | 110–130 | 1.30–1.45 | 2.30–2.40 | |
| Stegny | Pliocene clays (Cl) | - | - | 19.20–28.50 | 67.6–88.0 | 2.1–2.2 | 2.68–2.73 |
| SGGW Campus | Boulder clay (clSa) | - | - | 5.20–20.10 | 21.9–26.6 | 2.0–2.2 | 2.68–2.73 |