References
- Bahtiar ET, N-H Kim, AH Iswanto (2023) Biological rotation age of community teak (Tectona grandis) plantation based on the volume, biomass, and price growth curve determined through the analysis of its tree ring digitization. Forests 14(1):1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14101944
- Bennett BM (2014) The origins of timber plantations in India. Agricultural History Review 62(1):98–118. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43697955.
- Bhat K, P Priya (2004) Influence of provenance variation on wood properties of teak from the Western Ghat region in India. IAWA Journal 25(3):273–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000365
- Chaloupková K, J Stejskal, Y A El-Kassaby, et al. (2019) Current advances in seed orchard layouts: two case studies in conifers. Forests 10(1):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020093
- Cornelius J (1994) Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24(3):372–379. https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-050
- Gogate M G, D Gujar, A K Mandal, R Sharma (1997) Genetic analysis of quantitative characters in teak. Annals of Forestry 5(2):165–167.
- Kedharnath S (1984) Forest tree improvement in India. Proceedings: Plant Sciences 93(3):401–412.
- Ling J, Y Xiao, J Hu, F Wang, F Ouyang, J Wang, Y Wenig, H Zhang (2021) Geno-type by environment interaction analysis of growth of Picea koraiensis families at different sites using BLUP-GGE. New Forests 52(1):113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09785-3
- Muñoz F and L Sanchez (2025) breedR: Statistical Methods for Forest Genetic Resources Analysts. https://github.com/famuvie/breedR
- Narayanan C, P H Chawhaan, A K Mandal (2009) Inheritance pattern of growth and wood traits in teak (Tectona grandis Lf). Silvae Genetica 58(3): 97. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2009-0013
- Nelson C D (2023) Tree breeding, a necessary complement to genetic engineering. New Forests 54(5):721–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09931-z
- Pardos M, J Vázquez-Piqué, L Benito, G Madrigal, R Alejano, M Fernández, R Calama (2022) Does the age of Pinus sylvestris mother trees influence reproductive capacity and offspring seedling survival? Forests 13(6):937. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13060937
- Sreekanth P, M Balasundaran, P Nazeem (2014) Genetic and morphological variation in natural teak (Tectona grandis) populations of the Western Ghats in Southern India. Journal of Forestry Research 25(4):805–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0528-0
- Shukla S, S Viswanath (2014) Comparative study on growth, wood quality and financial returns of teak (Tectona grandis Lf) managed under three different agroforestry practices. Agroforestry Systems 88(2):331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9686-5
- Swain D, S C Mohanty, R Sharma, AK Mandal, BN Gupta (1996) Preliminary analysis of quantitative characters in teak. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, Part B 62(3):169–172.
- Swain D, AK Mandal, R Sharma (1999) Genetic analysis in teak (Tectona grandis). Journal of Tropical Forest Science 11(3):582–586. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43582567
- Tangmitcharoen S, JN Owens (1997) Pollen viability and pollen-tube growth following controlled pollination and their relation to low fruit production in teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.). Annals of Botany 80(4):401–410. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0440
- Varghese M, A Nicodemus, P Ramteke, et al. (2000) Variation in growth and wood traits among nine populations of teak. Silvae Genetica 49(1):4–5. White T, G Hodge (1988) Best linear prediction of breeding values in a forest tree improvement program. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76(5):719–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303518
- White T L, W T Adams, D B Neale (2007) Forest Genetics. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932855.0000.
- Wickham H, W Chang and M H Wickham (2016) Package ‘ggplot2.’ Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. Version 2(1):1–189.
- Wu H X (2019) Benefits and risks of using clones in forestry – a review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 34(4):352–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1487579