Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pedigree reconstruction and genetic parameter estimation in a hybridization orchard of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. urophylla Cover

Pedigree reconstruction and genetic parameter estimation in a hybridization orchard of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. urophylla

Open Access
|Feb 2025

References

  1. Bouffier L, Klápště J, Suontama M, Dungey HS, Mullin TJ (2019) Evaluation of forest tree breeding strategies based on partial pedigree reconstruction through simulations: Pinus pinaster and Eucalyptus nitensas case studies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 49(12):1504–1515. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2019-0145
  2. Chaix G, Gerber SVR, Vigneron P, Verhaegen D, Hamon S (2003) Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 107(4):705–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1294-0
  3. Chase M, Kesseli R, Bawa K (1996) Microsatellite markers for population and conservation genetics of tropical trees. American Journal of Botany. 83(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13873.x
  4. Coates JD, Sokolowski RES (1992) The mating system and patterns of genetic variation in Banksia cuneata A. S. George (Proteaceae). Heredity. 69(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.89
  5. Costa e Silva J, Borralho NMG, Araújo JA, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2008) Genetic parameters for growth, wood density and pulp yield in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 5(2):291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-008-0174-9
  6. Doerksen TK, Herbinger CM (2010) Impact of reconstructed pedigrees on progeny-test breeding values in red spruce. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 6(4):591–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-010-0274-1
  7. El-Kassaby YA, Lstiburek M, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Slavov GT, Howe GT (2006) Breeding Without Breeding: Approach, Example, and Proof of Concept. In: Fikret I, editor. Proceedings of the IUFRO Division 2 Joint Conference: Low Input Breeding and Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources; October 9-13; Antalya, Turkey. p. 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025737
  8. El-Kassaby YA, Lstiburek M (2009) Breeding without breeding. Genetics Research. 91(2):111–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/s001667230900007x
  9. El-Kassaby YA, Cappa EP, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klápště J, Lstibůrek M (2011) Breeding without Breeding: Is a Complete Pedigree Necessary for Efficient Breeding? Ingvarsson PK, editor. PLoS ONE. 6(10):e25737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025737.
  10. El-Kassaby YA, Funda T, Ben (2010) Female Reproductive Success Variation in a Pseudotsuga menziesii Seed Orchard as Revealed by Pedigree Reconstruction from a Bulk Seed Collection. Journal of Heredity. 101(2):164–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esp126
  11. El-Kassaby YA, Fashler AMK, Crown M (1989) Variation in fruitfulness in a Douglas- fir seed orchard and its effect on crop-management decisions. Silvae Genetica 38 (3-4): 113-121 https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1682
  12. El-Kassaby YA, Davidson R (1991) Impact of pollination environment manipulation on the apparent outcrossing rate in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Heredity. 66(1):55–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1991.7
  13. El-Kassaby YA (2015) Increasing Breeding without Breeding (BwB) Efficiency: Full- vs. Partial-Pedigree Reconstruction in Lodgepole Pine. International Journal of Genetic Science. 2(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.15226/2377-4274/2/1/00107
  14. Gaiotto FA, Bramucci MD, Grattapaglia (1997) Estimation of outcrossing rate in a breeding population of Eucalyptus urophylla with dominant RAPD and AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 95(5-6):842–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050634
  15. Gaspar MJ, De-Lucas A, Alia R, Almiro J, Hidalgo E, Louzada J, Almeida H, Gonzaléz-Martínez S (2009) Use of molecular markers for estimating breeding parameters: a case study in a Pinus pinaster Ait. progeny trial. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 5(4):609–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0213-1
  16. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) Jan 1. ASREML user guide release 3.0.
  17. Grattapaglia D, Ribeiro VJ, Rezende GDSP (2004) Retrospective selection of elite parent trees using paternity testing with microsatellite markers: an alternative short term breeding tactic for Eucalyptus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 109(1):192–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1617-9
  18. Griffin AR (2014) Clones or improved seedlings of Eucalyptus? Not a simple choice. International Forestry Review. 16(2):216–224. [accessed 2021 Nov 5]. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cfa/ifr/2014/00000016/00000002/art00010. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814811724793
  19. Grosser C, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE (2010) Microsatellite Based Paternity Analysis in a Clonal Eucalyptus nitens Seed Orchard. Silvae Genetica. 59(1-6):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2010-0007
  20. Hansen JK, McKinney LV (2009) Establishment of a quasi-field trial in Abies nordmanniana, test of a new approach to forest tree breeding. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 6(2):345–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0253-6
  21. Hamilton MG, Potts BM, Eucalyptus nitens genetic parameters. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science (2008) Nov 12;38(1):102-19.
  22. Hernández JJV, Upton JL, Valverde GR, Harrand L (2009) Genetic Parameters of Growth Traits and Wood Density in Eucalyptus grandis Progenies Planted in Argentina. Silvae Genetica. 58(1-6):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2009-0002
  23. Henderson CR, Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph: University of Guelph (1984)
  24. Isik F (2009) Analysis of Diallel Mating Designs. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.p.1 –34.
  25. Jones ME, Shepherd M, Henry R, Delves A (2007) Pollen flow in Eucalyptus grandis determined by paternity analysis using microsatellite markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 4(1):37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0086-0
  26. Kailnowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology. 16(5):1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03089.x
  27. Kamalakannan R, Varghese M, Lindgren D (2007) Fertility variation and its implications on relatedness in seed crops in seedling seed orchards of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis. Silvae Genetica. 1;56(1-6):253-9.
  28. Kamalakannan R, Varghese M, Suraj PG, Arutselvan T (2016). Options for converting a clone trial of Eucalyptus camaldulensis into a clonal seed orchard considering gain, fertility and effective clone number. Journal of forestry research. 27:51-7.
  29. Klápště J, Suontama M, Telfer E, Graham N, Low C, Stovold T, McKinley R, Dungey H (2017) Exploration of genetic architecture through sib-ship reconstruction in advanced breeding population of Eucalyptus nitens. PloS one. 12(9):e0185137–e0185137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185137
  30. Konuma A, Tsumura Y, Lee CT, Lee SL, Okuda T (2000) Estimation of gene flow in the tropical-rainforest tree Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae), inferred from paternity analysis. Molecular Ecology. 9(11):1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01081.x
  31. Lai BS, Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klápště J, Van Niejenhuis A, Cook C, Stoehr MU, Woods J, El-Kassaby YA (2010) Pollination dynamics in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction. Annals of Forest Science. 67(8):808–808. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010044
  32. Ladiges P, Davidson J, van Wyk G (1995) Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. Brittonia. 47(4):446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2807576
  33. Lambeth C, Lee BC, O’Malley D, Wheeler N (2001) Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 103(6-7):930–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100627
  34. Lee K, Kim IS, Kang KS (2022) Pedigree reconstruction and spatial analysis for genetic testing and selection in a Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière plantation. BMC Plant Biology. 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03530-y
  35. Lopez GA, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW, Apiolaza LA, Gelid PE (2002) Genetic variation and inter-trait correlations in Eucalyptus globulus base population trials in Argentina. For Genet 9:217–231 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100797
  36. Lstibůrek M, Hodge GR, Lachout P (2015) Uncovering genetic information from commercial forest plantations—making up for lost time using “Breeding without Breeding.” Tree Genetics & Genomes. 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0881-y
  37. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemertion JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology. 7(5):639–655. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x
  38. Moran GF, Bell JC, Griffin AR (1989) Reduction in levels of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. compared with natural populations. Silvae genetica/Silvae Genetica. 38(1):32–36.
  39. Nagabhushana K, Hendre PS, Sharma N, Rathinavelu R (2011) Novel design and deployment of orthologous genic SSR markers in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. BMC Proceedings. 5(S7). https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-s7-p51
  40. Naito Y, Konuma A, Iwata H, Suyama Y, Seiwa K, Okuda T, Lee SL, Muhammad N, Tsumura Y (2005) Selfing and inbreeding depression in seeds and seedlings of Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae). Journal of Plant Research. 118(6):423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-005-0245-z
  41. Raymond CA (2002) Genetics of Eucalyptus wood properties. Annals of Forest Science. 1;59(5-6):525-31. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002037
  42. Raymond CA, Apiolaza LA (2004) Incorporating wood quality and deployment traits in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Plantation forest bio-technology for the 21st Century, 5, pp.87-89.
  43. Rao H, Patterson B, Potts B, Vaillancourt R (2008) A microsatellite study on out-crossing rates and contamination in an Eucalyptus globulus breeding arboretum. Journal of Forestry Research. 19(2):136–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0023-6
  44. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity. 88(4):221–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800029
  45. Rönningen K, Van Vleck LD (1985) General and quantitative genetics (World Animal Science, Elsevier, NY) pp. 187–225.
  46. Sato AS, Mori ES (1996) Detection of inbreeding in seeds of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden. Rev Inst Flor8:131–134. https://doi.org/10.24278/2178-5031.199682648
  47. Varghese M, Kamalakannan R, Harwood CE, Lindgren D, McDonald MW (2009) Changes in growth performance and fecundity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis during domestication in southern India. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 5(4):629–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0215-z
  48. Volker PW, Dean CA, Tibbits WN, Ravenwood IC (1990) Genetic parameters and gains expected from selection in Eucalyptus globulus in Tasmania. Silvae Genetica. 39(1):18–21.
  49. Wei X, Borralho NM (1998) Genetic Control of Growth Traits of Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. BLAKE in South East China. Silvae genetica. 47:158–165.
  50. White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest Genetics. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932855.0000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2024-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 180 - 187
Published on: Feb 19, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Anand Raj Kumar Kullan, Rathinam Kamalakannan, Mohan Varghese, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.