Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tree growth and survival over 61 years at the Second International Larch Provenance Test in southeastern Michigan, USA Cover

Tree growth and survival over 61 years at the Second International Larch Provenance Test in southeastern Michigan, USA

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S (2008) Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications 1:95–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x335239525567494
  2. Arend M, Kuster T, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Dobbertin M (2011) Provenance-specific growth responses to drought and air warming in three European oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens). Tree Physiology 31: 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr00410.1093/treephys/tpr00421422189
  3. Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton S, Spurr SH (1998) Forest Ecology, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons.
  4. Barnes BV (1977) The International Larch Provenance Test in southeastern Michigan, USA. Silvae Genetica 26: 145-148.
  5. Breed MF, Stead MG, Ottewell KM, Gardner MG, Lowe AJ (2013) Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conservation Genetics 14: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z
  6. Bucharova A, Durka W, Holzel N, Kollmann J, Michalski S, Bossdorf O (2017) Are local plants the best for ecosystem restoration? It depends on how you analyze the data. Ecology and Evolution 7: 10683–10689. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.358510.1002/ece3.3585574347729299248
  7. Campbell RK (1979) Genecology of Douglas-fir in a watershed in the Oregon cascades. Ecology 60: 1036–1050. https://doi.org/10.2307/193687110.2307/1936871
  8. Campbell RK (1974) A provenance-transfer model for boreal regions. Medd. Nor. Inst. Skogforsk. 31: 542-566.
  9. Carter KK, Selin LO (1987) Larch plantation management in the Northeast. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 4: 18-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/4.1.1810.1093/njaf/4.1.18
  10. Cook DB (1955) Improvement of larch by selection of species and geographic races. New York Forester 12: 11-13.
  11. Dietrichson J (1964) The provenance problem illustrated by studies of growth-rhythm and climate. Medd. Nor. Skogforsoksves. Nr. 71. Bd. 19. H:5. Pp. 505-656.
  12. Eilmann B, Rigling A (2012) Tree-growth analyses to estimate tree species’ drought tolerance. Tree Physiology 32: 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps00410.1093/treephys/tps00422363071
  13. Gaspar MJ, Velasco T, Feito I, Alía F, Majada J (2013) Genetic variation of drought tolerance in Pinus pinaster at three hierarchical levels: a comparison of induced osmotic stress and field testing. PlosOne 8: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.007909410.1371/journal.pone.0079094381512424223885
  14. George J-P, Grabner M, Karanitsch-Ackerl S, Mayer K, Weißenbacher L, Schueler S (2016) Genetic variation, phenotypic stability, and repeatability of drought response in European larch throughout 50 years in a common garden experiment. Tree Physiology 37: 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw08510.1093/treephys/tpw085541207228173601
  15. Giertych M, Oleksyn J (1981) Summary of results on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) volume production in Ogievskij’s pre-revolutionary Russian provenance experiments. Silvae Genetica 30: 56-74.
  16. Gilmore DW, David AJ (2002) Current trends in management practices for European larch in North America. Forestry Chronicle 78: 822-829. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc78822-610.5558/tfc78822-6
  17. Hamann A, Gylander T, Chen P-Y (2011) Developing seed zones and transfer guidelines with multivariate regression trees. Tree Genetics and Genomes 7: 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-010-0341-710.1007/s11295-010-0341-7
  18. Hereford J (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness tradeoffs. The American Naturalist 173: 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/59761110.1086/59761119272016
  19. Hunt SS (1932) European larch in the northeastern United States. Harvard Forest Bulletin Number 16, 45 pp.
  20. Jansen S, Geburek T (2016) Historic translocations of European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) genetic resources across Europe – A review from the 17th until the mid-20th century. Forest Ecology and Management 379: 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.00710.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.007
  21. Jones TA (2013) Ecologically appropriate plant materials for restoration applications. BioScience 63: 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.3.910.1525/bio.2013.63.3.9
  22. Leech SM, Almuedo PL, O’Neill G (2011) Assisted migration: adapting forest management to a changing climate. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management 12: 18–34.
  23. Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3: e4010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.000401010.1371/journal.pone.0004010260297119104660
  24. Levesque M, Saurer M, Siegwolf R, Eilmann B, Brang P, Bugmann H, Rigling A (2013) Drought response of five conifer species under contrasting water availability suggests high vulnerability of Norway spruce and European larch. Global Change Biology 19: 3184–3199. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.1226810.1111/gcb.1226823712589
  25. Lu P, Parker WC, Colombo SJ, Man R (2016) Restructuring tree provenance test data to conform to reciprocal transplant experiments for detecting local adaptation. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 1088-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.1264710.1111/1365-2664.12647
  26. Lu P, Parker WH, Cherry M, Colombo S, Parker WC, Man R, Roubal N (2014) Survival and growth patterns of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) range wide provenances and their implications for climate change adaptation. Ecology and Evolution 4: 2360–2374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.110010.1002/ece3.1100420328525360273
  27. McComb AL (1955) The European larch: its races, site requirements and characteristics. Forest Science 1: 298-318.
  28. Morgenstern EK, Mullin TJ (1990) Growth and survival of black spruce in the range wide provenance study. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-01910.1139/x90-019
  29. Namkoong G, Usanis RA, Silen RR (1972) Age-related variation in genetic control of height growth in Douglas-fir. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 42: 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0028079110.1007/BF0028079124430894
  30. Nienstaedt H (1979) The role of provenance tests in tree improvement. In: Proceedings of the 17th Meeting of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Gander, August 27-30, 1979. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa. pp. 15-25.
  31. Oleksyn J, Giertych M (1984) Results of a 70 year old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenance experiment in Pulawy, Poland. Silvae Genetica 33: 22-27.
  32. Pâques L, Foffová E, Heinze B (2013) Larches (Larix sp.). In: Pâques L. (ed). Forest tree breeding in Europe-current state-of-the-art and perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 13–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6146-9_210.1007/978-94-007-6146-9_2
  33. Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton DA (1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs 69: 375–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/265716210.2307/2657162
  34. Sang Z, Sebastian-Azcona J, Hamann A, Menzel A, Hacke U (2019) Adaptive limitations of white spruce populations to drought imply vulnerability to climate change in its western range. Evolutionary Applications 12: 1850-1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.1284510.1111/eva.12845675215431548862
  35. Savolainen O, Pyhajarvi T, Knurr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 38: 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.09564610.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
  36. Schober R (1985) Neue Ergebnisse des II. Internationalen Lärchenprovenienzver-such von 1958/59 nach Aufnahmen von Teilversuchen in 11 europäïschen Ländern und den USA. J.D. Sauerlander’s Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 168 pp.
  37. Schober R (1981) On the first international larch provenance trail 1944. Report on three German trials. Part I. Part II. Part III. (Vom I. Internationalen Lärchenprovenienzversuch 1944. Bericht uber drei deutsche Teilversuche. Teil I. Teil II. Teil III.) Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 152: 181-195, 201-211, 221-233.
  38. Schober R (ed) (1977) Vom zweiten internationalen Lärchenprovenienzversuch. In: Ein Beitrag zur Lärchenherkunftsfrage. Sauerlaender Verlag, Frankfurt.
  39. Schober R (1976) Vom 2. Internationalen Lärchenprovenienzversuch, Begründet 1958/59. Pp 162-173. In: Proceedings of the XVI IUFRO World Congress, Division II. Norway.
  40. Thomson AM, Parker WH (2008) Boreal forest provenance tests used to predict optimal growth and response to climate change. 1. Jack Pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1139/x07-12210.1139/X07-122
  41. Wagner S, Litt T, Sanchez-Goni MF, Petit RJ (2015a) History of Larix decidua Mill. (European larch) since 130ka. Quaternary Science Review 124: 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.07.00210.1016/j.quascirev.2015.07.002
  42. Wagner S, Liepelt S, Gerber S, Petit RJ (2015b) Within-range translocations and their consequences in European larch. PLoS ONE 10:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.012751610.1371/journal.pone.0127516444147626000791
  43. Wang T, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN (2010) Integrating environmental and genetic effects to predict responses of tree populations to climate. Ecological Applications 20: 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2257.110.1890/08-2257.120349837
  44. Wang T, Hamann A, Yanchuk A, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN (2006) Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Global Change Biology 12: 2404–2416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.x10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.x
  45. Wiersma JH (1963) A new method of dealing with results of provenance tests. Silvae Genetica 12: 200-205.
  46. Ying CC, Morgenstern EK (1988) The status of provenance research in Canada. In: Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Truro, N.S., August 17-21, 1987. Part 2. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa. pp. 1-19.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2021-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2509-8934 | Journal ISSN: 0037-5349
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 21
Published on: Jan 27, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Daniel M. Kashian, Burton V. Barnes, published by Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.