Asymmetric introgression between Pinus sibirica and Pinus pumila in the Aldan plateau (Eastern Siberia)

Petrova, Elena A.; Zhuk, Evgeniya A.; Popov, Aleksandr G.; Bondar, Aleksandr A.; Belokon, Mariana M.; Goroshkevich, Sergei N.; Vasilyeva, Galina V.

doi:10.2478/sg-2018-0009

Abstract

Pinus sibirica and P. pumila are Asian five-needle pines with vast geographic distributions that are partially overlapping. Natural hybrids with intermediate morphology have been found previously, but there is a lack of evidence of ongoing introgression. The goal of our study was to elucidate the genetic structure of P. sibirica and P. pumila populations growing in the north-east of their sympatry zone (Aldan plateau) using cytoplasmic DNA markers. All studied P. sibirica and P. pumila trees had usual species-specific growth habits. Using nad1 intron2 of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and trnV of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) we found that trees morphologically identified as P. sibirica had pumila-specific mtDNA. Moreover, some of them also had pumila-specific cpDNA. P. pumila trees were typical and had pumila-type cytoplasmic DNA markers. These results suggest that interspecific hybridization took place long ago and lead to introgression and cryptic hybrids with P. sibirica appearance and P. pumila mtDNA

References

Anderson E (1953) Introgressive hybridization. Biol Rev 28(3): 280-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1953.tb01379.x10.1111/j.1469-185x.1953.tb01379.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bobrov EG (1944) On the features of the flora of the erratic region (one of the ways of forming). Sovetskaja botanika 2: 3-20 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bobrov EG (1961) Introgressive hybridization in the flora of the Baikalian Siberia. Botanical Journal 46(3): 313-327 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burgess KS, M Morgan, L Deverno and BC Husband (2005) Asymmetrical intro gression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abun dance. Mol Ecol 14: 3471-3483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365294X.2005.02670.x10.1111/j.1365294X.2005.02670.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen J, CG Tauer, G Bai, Y Huang, ME Payton and AG Holley (2004) Bidirectional introgression between Pinus taeda and Pinus echinata: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Can J For Res 34: 2508-2516. https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-13410.1139/X04-134
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demesure B, Sodzi M, Petit RJ (1995) A set of universals primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 4: 129-131.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00201.x10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00201.x7711952
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Doyle JJ and JL Doyle (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quanti ties of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11-15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gernandt DS, GG Lopez, SO Garcia and A Liston (2005) Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon 54(1): 29-42.https://doi.org/10.2307/2506530010.2307/25065300
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Godbout J, FC Yeh and J Bousquet (2012) Large-scale asymmetric introgression of cytoplasmic DNA reveals Holocene range displacement in a North American boreal pine complex. Ecol Evol 2(8): 1853-1866. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.29410.1002/ece3.294343399022957188
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goroshkevich SN (1999) On the possibility of natural hybridization between Pinus sibirica and Pinus pumila (Pinaceae) in the Baikal region. Botanical Journal. 84(9): 48-57 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goroshkevich SN (2004) Natural hybridization between Russian stone pine (Pinus sibirica) and Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila). In: Sniezko RA et al. (ed) Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability, and pest resistance. pp. 169-171
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goroshkevich SN, AG Popov and GV Vasilieva (2008) Ecological and morphological studies in the hybrid zone between Pinus sibirica and Pinus pumila. Ann For Res 51: 43-52. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 563 pp ISBN 0231051131
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gugerli F, J Senn, M Anzidei, A Madaghiele, U Büchler, C Sperisen and JJ Vendramin (2001) Chloroplast microsatellites and mitochondrial nad1 intron 2 sequences indicate congruent phylogenetic relationships among Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra), Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica), and Siberian dwarf pine (Pinus pumila). Mol Ecol 10: 1489-1497. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01285.x10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01285.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hao ZZ, YY Liu, M Nazaire, XX Wei and XQ Wang (2015) Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of sect. Quinquefoliae (Pinus): implications for Northern Hemisphere biogeography. Mol Phylogenet Evol 87: 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.01310.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.01325800283
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ito M, Y Suyama, TA Ohsawa and Y Watano (2008) Airborne-pollen pool and mating pattern in a hybrid zone between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla. Mol Ecol 17:5092-5103.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03966.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03966.x19120991
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koropachinskiy IYu and LI Milyutin (2006) Natural hybridization of woody plants. Novosibirsk, Academic Publishing House “Geo”, 223 pp. ISBN 5-9747-0034-1 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kupriyanova LA and MV Litvintseva (1974) The group Cembrae of genus Pinus, its volume and relationships according to palynological data. Botanical Journal 59(5): 630-644 (In Russian). Mogensen HL (1996) The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants. Am J Bot 83:383 404. https://doi.org/10.2307/244617210.2307/2446172
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morita Y, K Ueda, H Kataoka, N Miyoshi (1999) The size-frequency of Japanese Pinus pollen. The Bulletin of Research Institute of Natural Sciences Okayama University of Science 25:73-86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neale DB and RR Sederoff (1989) Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA and maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in loblolly pine. Theoret Appl Genetics 77(2): 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0026618910.1007/BF0026618924232531
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petit RJ, C Bodenes, A Ducousso, G Roussel and A Kremer (2004) Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol 161: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petit RJ and GG Vendramin (2007) Phylogeography of organelle DNA in plants: an introduction. In: Weiss S, Ferrand N (eds) Phylogeography of Southern European Refugia. New York, USA: Springer, pp 23-97. ISBN 978-1-4020- 4904-010.1007/1-4020-4904-8_2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petrova EA, SN Goroshkevich, MM Belokon, YS Belokon and DV Politov (2008) Population genetic structure and mating system in the hybrid zone between Pinus sibirica Du Tour and P. pumila (Pall.) Regel at the eastern Baikal Lake shore. Ann For Res 51: 19-30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petrova EA, SN Goroshkevich, DV Politov, MM Belokon, AG Popov and GV Vasilyeva (2007) Seed production and genetic structure of populations in natural hybrid zone of Siberian stone pine and Siberian dwarf pine. Khvoynyye borealnoy zony 24: 329-335 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Politov DV, MM Belokon, OP Maluchenko, YS Belokon, VN Molozhnikov, LE Mejnartowicz and KV Krutovsky (1999) Genetic evidence of natural hybridization between Pinus sibirica Du Tour and P. pumila (Pall.) Regel. Forest Genetics 6: 41-48.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pozdnyakov LK (1969) Forests in the Yakutskaya ASSR. In: Forest of USSR. Vol. 4. Moscow, Nauka, pp 469-537 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Senjo M, K Kimura, Y Watano, K Ueda and T Shimizu (1999) Extensive mitochondrial introgression from Pinus pumila to P. parviflora var. pentaphylla (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 112: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL0001386710.1007/PL00013867
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stebbins GL Jr (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc Am Phil Soc 103: 231-251.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Syring J, K Farrell, R Businsky, R Cronn and A Liston (2007) Widespread genealogical nonmonophyin species of Pinus Subgenus Strobus. Syst Biol 5 (2): 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1063515070125878710.1080/1063515070125878717454973
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thórsson AT, E Salmela and K Anamthawat-Jónsson (2001) Morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular evidence for introgressive hybridization in birch. J Hered 92(5): 404-408. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/92.5.40410.1093/jhered/92.5.40411773247
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tsutsui K, A Suwa, K Sawada, T Kato, TA Ohsawa and Y Watano (2009 Incongruence among mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear gene trees in Pinus subgenus Strobus (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 122: 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-009-0246-410.1007/s10265-009-0246-419529882
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vasilyeva GV and SN Goroshkevich (2013) Crossability of Pinus sibirica and P. pumila with their hybrids. Silvae Genetica 62(1-2):61-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2013-000810.1515/sg-2013-0008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vasilyeva GV (2014) Seed efficiency of hybrids between Siberian stone pine and Siberian dwarf pine from northern slope of Khamar-Daban ridge. Moscow state forest university bulletin. Lesnoj Vestnik 1: 85-90 (In Russian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vasilyeva GV, EA Zhuk and AG Popov (2010) Flowering phenology of the Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour), Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila (Pall.) Regel) and their hybrids. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology 1(9): 61-67 (In Russian, English summary)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang B and Wang XR (2014) Mitochondrial DNA capture and divergence in Pinus provide new insights into the evolution of the genus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 80: 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.07.01410.1016/j.ympev.2014.07.01425106134
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Watano Y, M Imazu and T Shimizu (1995) Chloroplast DNA typing by PCR-SSCP in the Pinus pumila-P. parviflora var. pentaphylla complex (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 108: 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0234423910.1007/BF02344239
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Watano Y, M Imazu and T Shimizu (1996) Spatial distribution of cpDNA and mtDNA haplotypes in a hybrid zone between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 109: 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0234455510.1007/BF02344555
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Asymmetric introgression between Pinus sibirica and Pinus pumila in the Aldan plateau (Eastern Siberia)

Abstract

Paradigm

My account