Diversity and the Difficulty of Living it: The Case of Public Spaces in Skopje (North Macedonia)
References
- - Allport, G.W. (1979) The nature of prejudice. 25th edn. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
- - Benhabib, S. (2007) ‘Crises of the Republic: Transformations of State Sovereignty and the Prospects of Democratic Citizenship’, in Habekost, E. (ed.) Justice, Governance, Cosmopolitanism, and the Politics of Difference: Reconfigurations in a Transnational World; Distinguished W.E.B. Du Bois Lectures 2004/2005. Berlin: Humboldt University, pp. 45–78.
- - Blokland, T. and van Eijk, G. (2009) ‘Do people who like diversity practice diversity in neighbourhood life? Neighbourhood use and the social networks of “diversity-seekers” in a mixed neighbourhood in the Netherlands’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(2), pp. 313–332.10.1080/13691830903387436
- - Butler, T. and Robson, G. (2001) ‘Social capital, Gentrification and neighbourhood change in London: A comparison of Three south London Neighbourhoods’, Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2145–2162.10.1080/00420980120087090
- - Coopmans, M., Lubbers, M. and Meuleman, R. (2015) ‘To whom do national days matter? A comparison of national belonging across generations and ethnic groups in the Netherlands’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(12), pp. 2037–2054.10.1080/01419870.2015.1023822
- - De Vos, E. (2005) ‘Public parks in Ghent’s city life: From expression to emancipation?’, European Planning Studies, 13(7), pp. 1035–1061.
- - Dixon, J. and Durrheim, K. (2000) ‘Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), pp. 27–44.10.1348/014466600164318
- - Dodovski, I. (2005) ‘Experimentum macedonicum – tragajki po idninata na multiculturalizmot (Experimentum macedonicum – searching for the future of multiculturalism)’, in Dodovski, I. (ed.) Multikulturalizmot vo Makedonija: model vo nastanuvanje (The multiculturalism in Macedonia: model-in-progress). Skopje: Fondacija Institut Otvoreno Opshtestvo, pp. ix–xv.
- - Duyvendak, J.W. (2004) ‘Neighbourhoods, cohesion and social safety’, in van der Vijver, K. and Terpstra, J. (eds.) Urban safety: Problems, governance, and strategies. Enschede: IPIT, University of Twente, pp. 27–35.
- - Goetz, A.M. and Gaventa, J. (2001) ‘From Consultation to Influence: Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery’, IDS Working Paper, 138.
- - Hewstone, M. (2003) ‘Intergroup contact Panacea for prejudice?’, The Psychologist, 16(7), pp. 352–355.
- - Hewstone, M. and Greenland, K. (2000) ‘Intergroup conflict’, International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), pp. 136–144.10.1080/002075900399439
- - Janev, G. (2005) ‘Avtohtoniot makedonski multikulturen model (Autochthon Macedonian multicultural model)’, in Dodovski, I. (ed.) Multikulturalizmot vo Makedonija: model vo nastanuvanje (Multiculturalism in Macedonia: model in-progress). Skopje: Fondacija Institut Otvoreno Opshtestvo, pp. 97–110.
- - Kuo, F.E., Sullivan, W.C., Coley, R.L. and Brunson, L. (1998) ‘Fertile Ground for Community: Inner-City Neighborhood Common Spaces’, American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), pp. 823–851.10.1023/A:1022294028903
- - Lofland, L.H. (1998) The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
- - Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (1995) ‘Urban form and social context: Cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(2), pp. 89–102.10.1177/0739456X9501400202
- - Madanipour, A. (1996) Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. New York: John Wiley & Son.
- - Manzo, L.C. and Perkins, D.D. (2006) ‘Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning’, Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), pp. 335–350.10.1177/0885412205286160
- - Messick, D.M. and Kramer, R.M. (2001) ‘Trust as a Form of Shallow Morality’, in Cook, K.S. (ed.) Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 89–118.
- - Musick, M.A. and Wilson, J. (2008) Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- - Musterd, S. and Andersson, R. (2006) ‘Employment, social mobility and neighbourhood effects: The case of Sweden’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), pp. 120–140.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00640.x
- - Peters, K. and de Haan, H. (2011) ‘Everyday spaces of inter-ethnic interaction: The meaning of urban public spaces in the Netherlands’, Leisure/Loisir, 35(2), pp. 169–190.10.1080/14927713.2011.567065
- - Putnam, R.D. (2007) ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the Twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), pp. 137–174.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
- - Rishbeth, C. (2001) ‘Ethnic minority groups and the design of public open space: An inclusive landscape?’, Landscape Research, 26(4), pp. 351–366.10.1080/01426390120090148
- - Sarkanjac, B. (2005) ‘Multikulturalizmot vo Makedonija (Multiculturalism in Macedonia)’, in Dodovski, I. (ed.) Multikulturalizmot vo Makedonija: model vo nastanuvanje (Multiculturalism in Macedonia: model in-progress). Skopje: Fondacija Institut Otvoreno Opshtestvo, pp. 14–27.
- - State Statistical Office of The Republic of Macedonia (2005) Popis na naselenieto, domakjinstvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija, 2002 - Kniga XIII (Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia, 2002 - Book XVIII). Available at: http://www.stat.gov.mk/Publikacii/knigaXIII.pdf (Accessed: 13 May 2018).
- - Taylor, C. (1994) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in Gutmann, A. (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–74.10.2307/j.ctt7snkj.6
- - Van Beckhoven, E. and van Kempen, R. (2003) ‘Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands’, Housing Studies, 18(6), pp. 853–875.10.1080/0267303032000135474
- - Van Der Laan Bouma-Doff, W. (2007) ‘Confined contact: Residential segregation and ethnic bridges in the Netherlands’, Urban Studies, 44(5), pp. 997–1017.10.1080/00420980701255965
- - Yiftachel, O. and Huxley, M. (2000) ‘Debating Dominance and Relevance: Notes on the ‘Communicative Turn’ in Planning Theory’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, pp. 907–913.10.1111/1468-2427.00286
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8462
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 50
Published on: Apr 24, 2020
Published by: South East European University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Katerina Mojanchevska, published by South East European University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.