Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Personal Documents as Data Sources for Social Sciences. A Review of History of Uses, Ethical, Methodological and Epistemological Considerations Cover

Personal Documents as Data Sources for Social Sciences. A Review of History of Uses, Ethical, Methodological and Epistemological Considerations

Social Change Review
Volume 10 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)
By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2014
References

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1993.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Allport, Gordon W. 1942.. New York: Science Research Council.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, Louis. 1976. Reply to John Lewis. In.London: New Left Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Althusser, Louis. 1969.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, Alfred L. 1940. The Statistical Analysis of the Structure of a Single Personality.37 (7): 518-519
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bagnoli, Anna. 2004. Researching Identities with Multi-Method Autobiographies.9 (2), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/2/bagnoli.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Beers, Cliford W. 1928 [1907].. New York: Doubleday, Doran.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Bertaux, Daniel (ed.). 1981.London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Bishop, Libby. 2007. A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism.12 (3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Blumer, Herbert. 1979 [1939].New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Boserman, Cristina. 2009. Diaries from Cannabis Users: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.13 (4): 429-448.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Brown, Barry A. T., Abigail J. Sellen and Kenton P. O’Hara. 2000. A Diary Study of Information Capture in Working Life. In, eds. Thea Turner, Gerd Szwillus, Mary Czerwinski, Fabio Peterno and Steven Pemberton, 438-445.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Bytheway, Bill. 2011..Bristol: Policy Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Carless, David and Kitrina Douglas. 2012. Stories of success: Cultural Narratives and Personal Stories of Elite and Professional Athletes.13 (3): 387-398.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Carter, Scott and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When the Participants do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. In,, eds. Gerrit van der Veer and Carolyn Gale, 899-908.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Cartwright, Dorwin and John R.P. French, Jr. 1939. The Reliability of Life- History Studies.8 (2): 110-119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Césaire, Aimé. 1972.. New-York: Monthly Review Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Corti, Louise. 2011. The European Landscape of Qualitative Social Research Archives: Methodological and Practical Issues [77 paragraphs].12 (3): Art. 11, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103117.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Cucu-Oancea, Ozana. 2010. The Reuse of Qualitative Data in the Social Sciences. Archiving and Analysis.55 (2): 141-160.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Czarniawska, Barbara. 2007.. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Czarniawska, Barbara. 2002.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998..Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Czarniawska, Barbara. 1997.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Czerwinski, Mary, Eric Horwitz and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In, eds. Elizabeth Dykstra-Erickson and Manfred Tscheligi, 175-182.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Denzin, Norman K. 1997.London: Sage.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Denzin, Norman K. 1996. Prophetic Pragmatism and the Postmodern: A Comment on Maines.19 (4): 341-356.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Denzin, Norman K. 1995.. London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Denzin, Norman K. 1992.Oxford: Blackwell. Denzin, Norman K. 1991.. London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Denzin, Norman K. 1989.. London: Sage.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Denzin, Norman K. 1978.. New-York: Mc Graw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Dirk, Michel-Schertges. 2011. Offene und verschlossene biografische Politisierung [86 Absätze].12 (2): Art. 22, http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1102225.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Dollard, John. 1935.. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Down, Simon. 2012. Evaluating the Impacts of Government Policy through the Long View of Life History.24 (7-8): 619-639.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Elliott, Heather. 1997. The Use of Diaries in Sociological Research on Health Experience.2 (2), http://www. socresonline.org.uk/2/2/7.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Frenkel-Brunswik, Else. 1939. Mechanism of Self-Deception.10 (3): 407-420.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Gillies, Val and Rosalind Edwards. 2005. Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context [30 paragraphs].6 (1): Art. 44, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de: 0114-fqs0501444.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Gobo, Giampietro. 2005. The Renaissance of Qualitative Methods [22 paragraphs].6 (3): Art. 42, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn: de:0114-fqs0503420.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Goot, Murray. 2008. Mass-Observation and Modern Public Opinion Research. In, eds. Wolfgang Donsbach and Michael W. Traugott, 93-103. London: Sage.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Gottschalk, Louis R., Clyde Kluckhohn and Robert Cooley Angell. 1942.. New York: Science Research Council.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Guion, Lisa A., David C. Diehl and Debra McDonald. 2011 [2002].Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. FCS6014. University of Florida, https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fy394.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Hall, G. Stanley. 1904.. 2 vol. New-York: Appleton.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Hinton, James. 2010..Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Hinton, James. 2013 (forthcoming).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Hislop, Jenny, Sara Arber, Rob Meadows and Sue Venn. 2005. Narratives of the Night: The Use of Audio Diaries in researching Sleep.10 (4), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/4/ hislop.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Hubble, Nick. 2006.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Jacelon, Cynthia S. and Kristal Imperio. 2005. Participant Diaries as a Source of Data in Research with Older Adults.15 (7): 991-997.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Jeffrey, Tom. 1999 [1979]. Mass-Observation: A Short History. Occasional Paper no. 10. University of Sussex: Mass-Observation Archive.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Jones, R. Kenneth. 2000. The unsolicited diary as a qualitative research tool for advanced research capacity in the field.10 (4): 555-567.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Koa Wing, Sandra. 2005. Acquiring Qualitative Data for re-Use: Issues from Mass Observation. Paper presented at the CRESC Methods Workshop: Reusing Qualitative Data, September 28, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Kramer, Anne-Marie. 2011. Kinship, Affinity and Connectedness: Exploring the Role of Genealogy in Personal Lives.46 (3): 379-395.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Krueger, Ernest Theodor. 1925..Unpublished. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Sociology.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Kushner, Tony. 2004.. Hampshire: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Kynaston, David. 2009.London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Larson, Reed W. and David M. Almeida. 1999. Emotional Transmission in the Dayly Lives of Families: A New Paradigm for Studying Family Process.61 (1): 5-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Laughey, Dan. 2006.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Lejeune, Philippe. 2011. The Story of a French Life-Writing Archive: ‘Association pour l'Autobiographie et le Patrimoine Autobiographique’ [29 paragraphs].12(3): Art. 7, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110371.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Lejeune, Philippe. 2009. The Practice of the Private Journal: Chronicle of an Investigation (1986-1998). In, ed. Jeremy D.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Popkin and Julie Rak, 29-48. Manoa: Biographical Center by the University of Hawaii.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Lejeune, Philippe. 1993.. Paris: Seuil.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Lejeune, Philippe and Catherine Bogaert (eds.). 2003.Paris: Textuel. Letherby, Gayle and Dawn Zdrodowski. 1995. Dear Researcher: The Use of Correspondence as a Method within Feminist Qualitative Research.9 (5): 576-593.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1966.. London: Weidenfeld.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Lewis, Oscar. 1961..
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. New York: Random House.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Lewis, Kate and Claire L. Massey. 2004. Help or Hindrance? Participant Diaries as a Qualitative Data Collection Tool. Paper presented at the 17th Annual SEAANZ Conference: Entrepreneurship as the way of the Future, September 26-29, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Maines, David. 1996. On Postmodernism, Pragmatism and Plasterers: Some Interactionis's Thought and Queries.19 (4): 323-340.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  67. Maller, J. B. 1930. The Effect of Signing One's Name.31: 882-884.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Mason, Jennifer. 2007. ‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology.12 (3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  69. Milligan, Christine, Amanda Bingley and Anthony Gatrell. 2005. Digging Deep: Using Diary Techniques to Explore the Place of Health and Well-Being amongst Older People.61 (9): 1882-1892.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  70. Moinian, Farzaneh. 2006. The Construction of Identity on the Internet. Oops! I’ve left my diary open to the whole world!13 (1): 49-68.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  71. Monrouxe, Lynn V. 2009. Solicited Audio Diaries in Longitudinal Narrative Research: A View from Inside.9 (1): 81-103.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  72. Morrison, Diane M., Mary Rogers Gillmore, Marilyn J. Hoppe, Jan Gaylord, Barbara C. Leigh and Damien Rainey. 2003. Adolescent Drinking and Sex: Findings from a Daily Diary Study.35 (4): 162-168.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  73. Murchison, Carl (ed.). 1930/1932/1936.. 3 volumes. Worcester: Clark University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Murray, Goot. 2008. Mass-Observation and Modern Public Opinion Research. In, eds.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  75. Wolfgang Donsbach and Michael W. Traugott, 93-103. London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Nisbet, Robert. 1976.. London: Heinemann.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Palen, Leysia, and Marilyn Salzman. 2002. Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. In, 87-95.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Plummer, Ken. 2001..
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  79. London: Sage Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Polansky, Norman A. 1941. How shall a Life-History be written?9 (3): 188-207. Rebreyend, Anne-Claire. 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Mirail.
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Reckless, Walter C. and Lowell S. Selling. 1937. A Sociological and Psychiatric Interview Compared.7 (4): 532-539.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  83. Redfield, Robert. 1942a. Foreword. Ineds. Louis Reichenthal Gottschalk, Clyde Kluckhohn and Robert Angell. New York: Science Research Council.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. Redfield, Robert. 1942b. Foreword. In, Gordon W. Allport. New York: Science Research Council.
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. Rosenau, Marie Pauline. 1992..
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  86. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  87. Said, Edward. 1992.. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  88. Savage, Mike. 2007. Changing Social Class Identities in Post-War Britain: Perspectives from Mass-Observation.12 (3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/6.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  89. Schiebel, Martina. 2011. Diskursive und biografische Konstruktion politischer Staatsfeind/innen. Kommunistinnen und Kommunisten in der frühen Bundesrepublik Deutschland [98 Absätze].12 (2): Art. 27, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1102271.
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. Schubotz, Dirk, Martin Melaugh and Peter McLoughlin. 2011. Archiving Qualitative Data in the Context of a Society Coming out of Conflict: Some Lessons from Northern Ireland [47 paragraphs].12 (3): Art. 13, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. Shalin, Dimitri N. 1993. Modernity, Postmodernism, and Pragmatist Inquiry: An Introduction.16 (4): 303-332.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  92. Sheridan, Dorothy. 1993. Writing to the Archive: Mass-Observation as Autobiography.27 (1): 27-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  93. Sheridan, Dorothy. 2000. Reviewing Mass Observation: the Archive and its Researchers.1 (3), http://www.qualitative-research.net.fgs-exte/3-00sheridan-e.htm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. Sheridan, Dorothy, Brian V. Street and David Bloome. 2000.. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  95. Smart, Carol. 2011. Families, Secrets and Memories.45 (4): 539-553.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  96. Smioski, Andrea. 2011. Archiving Qualitative Data: Infrastructure, Acquisition, Documentation, Distribution. Experiences from WISDOM, the Austrian Data Archive [42 paragraphs].12 (3): Art. 18, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103181.
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. Stones, Robe. 1996..
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  98. London: Macmillan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  99. Stouffer, Samuel Andrew. 1930.. Unpublished. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    Search in Google Scholar
  100. Thomas, William Isaac. 1928. The Methodology of Behavior Study. In, eds. William Isaac Thomas and Dorothy Swayne Thomas, 553-576New York: Knopf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  101. Thomas, William Isaac and Florian Znaniecki. 1920.(vol. IV and V)Boston: The Groham Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  102. Thomas, William Isaac and Florian Znaniecki. 1919.(vol. III)Boston: The Groham Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  103. Thomas, William Isaac and Florian Znaniecki. 1918.(vol. I and II). Boston: Badger.
    Search in Google Scholar
  104. Thompson, Paul and Howard Newby. 2005. Families, social mobility and ageing, an intergenerational approach, 1900-1988 [computer file]. SN
    Search in Google Scholar
  105. 4938. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive, http://www.esds.ac.uk/ findingData/snDescription.asp?sn=4938&key=4938.
    Search in Google Scholar
  106. Thomson, Denise, Lana Bzdel, Karen Golden-Biddle, Trish Reay and Carole A. Estabrooks. 2005. Central Questions of Anonymization: A Case Study of Secondary Use of Qualitative Data [33 paragraphs].6 (1): Art. 29, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501297.
    Search in Google Scholar
  107. Törrönen, Jukka and Antti Maunu. 2011. Friendship and social emotions in young adult Finns' drinking diaries.16 (1), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/16/1/4.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  108. Valles Martínez, Miguel S. 2011. Archival and Biographical Research Sensitivity: A European Perspective from Spain [38 paragraphs].
    Search in Google Scholar
  109. 12 (3): Art. 2, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110327.
    Search in Google Scholar
  110. Valles Martínez, Miguel S., Louise Corti, Maria Tamboukou and Alejandro Baer. 2011. Qualitative Archives and Biographical Research Methods.
    Search in Google Scholar
  111. An Introduction to the FQS Special Issue [19 paragraphs].12 (3): Art. 8, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110381.
    Search in Google Scholar
  112. Van den Berg, Harry. 2005. Reanalyzing Qualitative Interviews From Different Angles: The Risk of Decontextualization and Other Problems of Sharing Qualitative Data [48 paragraphs].6 (1): Art. 30, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501305.
    Search in Google Scholar
  113. Worth, Nancy. 2009. Making use of audio diaries in research with young people.14 (4), http://www.socresonline. org.uk/14/4/9.html.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  114. Zimmerman, Don H. and D. Lawrence Wieder. 1977. The Diary: Diary- Interview Method.5 (4): 479-498.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2013-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2068-8016 | Journal ISSN: 2068-8008
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 36
Published on: Feb 13, 2014
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Personal documents Qualitative data Data archiving Theoretical frameworks Triangulation
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Sociology,
Sociology, other

© 2014 Ozana Cucu-Oancea, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 10 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)
Next article