Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process Cover

Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process

Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Volume 72 (2022): Issue 2 (November 2022)
By: Duc Trung Do and  Nhu-Tung Nguyen  
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. [1] Constantin, Z., Michael, D. “Multiple Criteria Decision Making - Applications in Management and Engineering”, Springer, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Morteza, Y., Pascale, Z., Edmundas, K. Z., Zenonas, T. “A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems”, Management Decision, Emerald 57(9), pp. 2501 – 2519, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Ayse, T. “Financial performance analysis of electricity generation companies with multi-criteria decision making: Entropy-based Cocoso method”, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal 9(2), pp.532–546, 2021. DOI: 10.15295/bmij.v9i2.1794
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Alptekin, U., Figen, B., Lutfu, S., Darjan, K., Dragisa, S., Gabrijela, P. “Selection of insulation materials with PSI-CRITIC based CoCoSo method”, Journal of Construction, 20(2), pp. 382 – 392, 2021. DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.20.2.382
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Erfan, B. T., Ali, E. T. “A Cluster-based Stratified Hybrid Decision Support Model under Uncertainty: Sustainable Healthcare Landfill Location Selection”, Applied Intelligence, pp. 1 – 10, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03335-4
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Morteza, Y., Zhi, W., Huchang, L., Audrius, B., Zenonas, T. “A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 25(8), pp. 858 – 874, 2019. DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2019.11309
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Xindong, P., Haihui, H. “Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with critic for financial risk evaluation”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 26(4), pp. 695 – 724, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/tede.2020.11920
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Alptekin, U., Gabrijela, P., Pavle, R., Dragisa, S., Darjan, K. “A new hybrid fuzzy PSIPiprecia-Cocoso MCDM based approach to solving the transportation company selection problem”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 27(5), pp. 1227 – 1249, 2021. DOI: 10.3846/tede.2021.15058
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Dragan, P., Goran, C. “The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)”, Expert Systems with Applications 42, pp. 3016 – 3028, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Radojko, L. “Application of MABAC Method in Evaluation of Sector Efficiency in Serbia”, Review of International Comparative Management 22(3), pp. 400 – 418, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Darko, B., Aleksandar, M. “Multicriteria decision-making related to flood protection of Arilje city”, 7th International scientific professional conference security and crisis management – theory and practice – safety for the future, Serbia, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Ankur, C., Suresh, K. J., Sachin, K. M. “Socio-technological framework for selecting suppliers of pharmaceuticals in a pandemic environment”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), 2022. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-02-2021-0081
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Zeljko, S., Dragan, P., Edmundas, K. Z., Goran, C., Olegas, P. “The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods”, Symmetry, 9(11), pp. 1 – 25, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/sym9110264
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Pijush, K. D. P., Sanjib, B., Saurabh, P., Dragan, M., Prasenjit, C. “A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Resource Selection in Mobile Crowd Computing”, Symmetry 13(9), pp. 1 – 51, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/sym13091713
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Edmundas, K. Z., Jolanta, T., Krishnendu, A., Samarjit, K. “A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects”, Symmetry 10(2), pp. 1 – 28, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/sym10020046
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Milan, M., Marko, B., Goran, T. “Selection of the railroad container terminal in Serbia based on multi criteria decision making methods”, Decision Making: Applicatons in Management and Engineering, 1(2), pp. 1 – 15, 2018. DOI: 10.31181/dmame1802001m
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Pamuca, D. S., Tarle, S. P., Parezanovi, T. “New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL -MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 31(1), pp. 1641 – 1665, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1506706
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Esra, A. “An analysis on turkey’s merger and acquisition activities: MAIRCA method”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi 12(1), pp. 1 – 11, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Sema, K. K. “Evaluation of the Effect of COVID-19 on Countries’ Sustainable Development Level: A comparative MCDM framework”, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications 3(3), pp. 101 – 122, 2020. DOI: 10.31181/oresta20303101k
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Sarfaraz, H. Z., Fatih, E., Dragan, P., Saulius, R. “Neighborhood selection for a newcomer via a novel BWM-based revised MAIRCA integrated model: a case from the Coquimbo-La Serena conurbation, Chile”, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 24(2), pp. 102 – 118, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/ijspm.2020.11543
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., Antucheviciene, J. “Evaluation by an Area-based Method of Ranking Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets (EAMRIT-2F) for Multi-criteria Group Decisionmaking”, Transformations in Business & Economics 15(3), pp. 76 – 95, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Yazd, A. K., Hanne, T., Gomez, J. C. O., Alcaraz, J. L. G. “Finding the Best Third-Party Logistics in the Automobile Industry: A Hybrid Approach”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, pp. 1 – 19, 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5251261
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Ieva, M. K., Ghorbani, S. “Supply chain contract selection in the healthcare industry: a hybrid mcdm method in uncertainty environment”, Independent journal of management and production 12(4) pp. 1160 – 1187, 2021. DOI: 10.14807/ijmp.v12i4.1356
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. “A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations”, Computers & Industrial Engineering 112, pp. 156 – 174, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.017
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Trung, D. D., Thien, N. V. Nhu-Tung, N. “Application of TOPSIS Method in Multi-Objective Optimization of the Grinding Process Using Segmented Grinding Wheel”, Tribology in Industry 43(1), pp. 12 – 22, 2021. DOI: 10.24874/ti.998.11.20.12
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Wisnuadi, A. R., Damayanti, R. W., Pujiyanto, E. “Multi Response Optimization of Internal Grinding Process Parameters for Outer Ring using Taguchi Method and PCRTOPSIS”, AIP Conference Proceedings 1931(1), pp. 1 – 6, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Kumar, J., Verma, R. K. “Experimental investigations and multiple criteria optimization during milling of Graphene Oxide (GO) doped epoxy/CFRP composites using TOPSISAHP hybrid module”, FME Transactions 48(3), pp. 628 – 635, 2020. DOI: 10.5937/fme2003628K
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Trung, D. D. “A combination method for multi-criteria decision making problem in turning process”, Manufacturing Review 8(26), pp. 1 – 17, 2021. DOI: 10.1051/mfreview/2021024
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Trung, D. D., Thinh, H. X. “A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study”, Advances in Production Engineering & Management 16(4) pp. 443 – 456, 2021. DOI: 10.14743/apem2021.4.412
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Trung, D. D. “Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Milling Process”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 71(2), pp. 69 – 84, 2021. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2021-0019
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Huu-Quang, N., Xuan-Hung, L., Thanh-Tu, N., Quoc-Hoang, T., Ngoc-Pi, V. “A Comparative Study on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Dressing Process for Internal Grinding”, Machines 10(5), pp. 1 – 14, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/machines10050303
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Huu-Quang, N., Van-Tung, N., Dang-Phong, P., Quoc-Hoang, T., Ngoc-Pi, V. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the PMEDM Process by Using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA Methods”, Applied sciences 12(8), pp. 1 – 11, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/app12083720
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Varatharajulu, M., Muthukannan, D., Bhuvanesh Kumar, M., Jayaprakash, G., Baskar, N. “Multi criteria decision making through TOPSIS and COPRAS on drilling parameters of magnesium AZ91”, Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 3(38), pp. 1 – 18, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Trung, D. D. “Application of TOPSIS and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process”, Journal of Machine Engineering 21(4), pp. 57 – 71, 2021. DOI: 10.36897/jme/142599
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Gunantara, N. “A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications”, Cogent Engineering 5(1), pp. 1 – 21, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Dragan, P., Zeljko, S., Sinisa, S. “A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM)”, Symmetry 10(9), pp. 1 – 22, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/sym10090393
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Thien, N. V., Dung, H. T., Trung, D. D., Nhu-Tung, N. “Multi-Objective Optimization of turning process using VIKOR method”, Journal of Applied Engineering Science 19(4), pp. 868 – 873, 2021. DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-29654
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Nhu-Tung, N., Trung, D. D. “Modeling and improvement of the surface roughness model in hole turning process 3X13 stainless steel by Johnson transformation”, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development 10(3), pp. 12097 – 12110, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Klocke, F., Brinksmeier E., Weinert K. “Capability Profile of Hard Cutting and Grinding Processes”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 54(2), pp. 22 – 45, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60018-3
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Ko, T. J., Kim H. S. “Surface Integrity and Machineability in Intermittent Hard Turning”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 18, pp. 168 – 175, 2001. DOI: 10.1007/s001700170072
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y. “A new approach for multiple objective decision making”, Computers & Operations Research 20, pp. 889 – 899, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. “Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC)”, Symmetry 13(4), pp. 1 – 20, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/sym13040525
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Dawes R. M., Coorigan B. “Linear Models in Decision Malking”, Psychological Bulletin 81(2), pp. 95 – 106, 1974. DOI: 10.1037/h0037613
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Einhorn, H. J., McCoach, W. “A Symble Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation”, Behavioral Scicence 22(4), pp. 270 – 282, 1997. DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830220405
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Zeljko, S. “Decision-making in transport and logistics using integrated models”, The eighth international conference: Transport and logistics – University of NIS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, pp. 21 – 26, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Bhosetty, B., Gurram, V. K., Kumba, A. B. “Effect of minimum quantity lubrication on surface roughness and temperature in milling of EN31 steel for die making”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 69(1), pp. 61 – 68, 2019. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2019-0005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Manoj, M.,Gopal, A., Swati, D. C., Umesh, B.,Veerendra, P. “Effect of Machine Feed Rate on Kerf-Width, Material Removal Rate, and Surface Roughness in Machining of Al/SiC Composite Material with Wire Electrical Discharge Machine’, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of mechanical engineering 70(1), pp. 81 – 88, 2020. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2020-0008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Trung, D. D. “The combination of Taguchi – Entropy – WASPAS – PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making when external cylindrical grinding of 65G steel”, Journal of Machine Engineering 21(4), pp. 90 – 105, 2021. DOI: 10.36897/jme/144260
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Rekah R., Baskar N., Padmanaban M. R. A, Palanisamy A. “Optimization of Cylindrical Grinding Process Parameters Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms”, Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences 27, pp. 389 – 395, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2022-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5471 | Journal ISSN: 0039-2472
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 40
Published on: Nov 7, 2022
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
MCDM,
COCOSO,
MABAC,
MAIRCA,
EAMR,
TOPSIS,
FUCOM,
Hole turning
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Fundamentals of mechanical engineering,
Mechanics

© 2022 Duc Trung Do, Nhu-Tung Nguyen, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 72 (2022): Issue 2 (November 2022)Next article