Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Glaucoma vs. Biomechanical Properties of Cornea Cover

References

  1. [1] Garway-Heath, D., et al: “Measurement of Intraocular Pressure, In 4th Consensus Meeting: Intraocular Pressure”, Fort Lauderdale, FL, edited by Robert N. Weinreb, James D. Brandt, David Garway-Heath and Felipe A. Medeiros, 2007.
  2. [2] Tonnu, P.-A., Ho, T., Sharma, K., White, E., Bunce, C., Garway-Heath, D. “A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability”, Br. J. Ophthalmology 89, pp. 847 – 850, 2005.
  3. [3] Tonnu, P.-A., Ho, T., Newson, T., El Sheikh, A., Sharma, K., White, E., Bunce, C., Garway-Heath, D. “The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, noncontact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry”, Br. J. Ophthalmology 89, pp. 851 – 854, 2005.
  4. [4] Garcia-Porta, N., Fernandes, P., Queiros, A., Salgado-Borges, J., Parafita-Mato, M., González-Méijome, J. M. “Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Different Ocular Conditions and New Measurement Techniques”, ISRN Ophthalmology, Article ID 724546, 19 pages, 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/724546
  5. [5] Liu, J., He, X. “Corneal Stiffness Affects IOP Elevation during Rapid Volume Change in the Eye”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 50 (5), pp. 2224 – 2229, 2009.
  6. [6] Jung, Y., Park, H.-Y. L., Yang, H.J., Park, Ch. K. “Characteristics of corneal biomechanical responses detected by a non-contact scheimpflug-based tonometer in eyes with glaucoma”, Acta Ophthalmologica 95, e556–e563, 2017.
  7. [7] Kling, S., Hafezi, F. “Corneal biomechanics – a review”, Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 37, pp. 240–252, 2017. DOI: 10.1111/opo
  8. [8] Ko, M.W.L., Leung, L.K.K., Lam, D.C.C. “Comparative study of corneal tangent elastic modulus measurement using corneal indentation device”, Medical Engineering & Physics 36, pp. 1115 – 1121, 2014.
  9. [9] Guarnieri, F.A. “Chapter 2, Corneal Biomechanics”, In F.A. Guarnieri (ed.), Corneal Biomechanics and Refractive Surgery, Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015.
  10. [10] Erickson, D.H., Goodwin, D., Rollins, M., Belaustegui, A., Anderson, Ch. “Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude”, Optometry 80 (4), pp. 169 – 174, 2009.
  11. [11] Mashige, K.P. “A review of corneal diameter, curvature and thickness values and influencing factors”, S. Afr. Optometrist 72 (4), pp. 185 – 194, 2013. DOI: 10.4102/aveh.v72i4.58
  12. [12] Simonini, I., Pandolfi, A. “The influence of intraocular pressure and air jet pressure on corneal contactless tonometry tests”, Journal of the mechanical behaviour of biomedical materials 58, pp. 75 – 89, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.030
  13. [13] Li-Ke Wang, Yan-Ping Huang, Lei Tian, Chea-su Kee, Yong-Ping Zheng “Measurement of corneal tangent modulus using ultrasound indentation”, Ultrasonics 71, pp. 20 – 28, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.05.011
  14. [14] Wachtl, J., Töteberg-Harms, M., Frimmel, S., Roos, M., Kniestedt, Ch. “Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma”, JAMA Ophthalmol. 135 (6), pp. 601 – 608, 2017. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1012
  15. [15] Hučko, B., Kučera, Ľ., Ďuriš, S., Pavlásek, P., Rybář, J., Hodál, J.: Modelling of Cornea Applanation when Measuring Eye Pressure, IN: ICDM 2018, Springer Verlag, 2019 (in press)
  16. [16] Guarnieri, F.A. “Corneal Biomechanics and Refractive Surgery”, New York, 2015.
  17. [17] Po-Jen Shin, et al. “Estimation of the Corneal Young’s Modulus In Vivo Based on a Fluid-Filled Spherical-Shell Model with Scheimpflug Imaging”, Journal of Ophthalmology, Article ID 5410143, 11 pages, 2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5410143
  18. [18] Blasuwendraad, J. “Plates and FEM”, Springer Verlag, 2010.
  19. [19] Hughes, T.J.R. “The finite element method: linear static and dynamic, finite element analysis”, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
  20. [20] Écsi, L., Jarabek, R., Élesztös, P. “A study on ‘compatibity assumption’ of contemporary multiplicative plasticity models”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 69 (2), pp. 15 – 26, 2019. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2019-0015
  21. [21] Nema, H. V., Nema, N. “Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology”, JP Medical Ltd, India 2014.
  22. [22] Realini, T. “Occular Response Analyser”, Glaucoma Today, pp. 27 – 30, 2008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5471 | Journal ISSN: 0039-2472
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 116
Published on: Jun 28, 2019
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Hučko Branislav, Ferková Sylvia Lea, Ďuriš Stanislav, Rybář Jan, Pavlásek Peter, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.