Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Linguistic and Typological Features of Clickbait in Youtube Video Titles Cover

The Linguistic and Typological Features of Clickbait in Youtube Video Titles

By: Roy Kemm  
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. ALVES, L., ANTUNES, N., AGRICI, O., SOUSA, C., & RAMOS, C. (2016). Click Bait: You won’t believe what happens next!. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 5(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2016V5I2.P196-21310.21664/2238-8869.2016v5i2.p196-213
  2. BIYANI, P., TSIOUTSIOULIKLIS, K., & BLACKMER, J. (2016, February 21). “8 Amazing secrets for getting more clicks”: Detecting clickbaits in news streams using article informality. [Conference proceedings]. Proceedings of the 13th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 94-100). AAAI-16, Phoenix, Arizona. AAAI Press. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI16/paper/view/11807/1156910.1609/aaai.v30i1.9966
  3. BLOM, J. N. & HANSEN, K. R. (2014). Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.01010.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010
  4. CHAKRABORTY, A., PARANJAPE, A., SOURYA, K., & NILOY, G. (2016). Stop Clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media”. [Conference proceedings]. 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (pp. 9–16). 2016 IEEE, San Francisco, California. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.0978610.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752207
  5. CHEN, Y., CONROY, N. J., & RUBIN, V. L. (2015). Misleading online content: Recognising clickbait as “False News”. [Conference proceedings]. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection (pp. 15-19). 2015 ACM, Seattle, Washington. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2823465.282346710.1145/2823465.2823467
  6. DEPRAETERE, I., & REED, S. (2020). Mood and modality in English. In B. Aarts, A. McMahon, & Hinrichs, L. (Eds), The Handbook of English Linguistics (pp. 269–290). Blackwell.10.1002/9781119540618.ch12
  7. DOR, D. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 695–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-010.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
  8. ELYASHAR, A., BENDAHAN, J., & PUZIS, R. (2017). Detecting clickbait in online social media: You won’t believe how we did it. http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06699
  9. GENÇ, Ş., & SURER, E. (2021). ClickbaitTR: Dataset for clickbait detection from Turkish news sites and social media with a comparative analysis via machine learning algorithms. Journal of Information Science, 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165551521100774610.1177/01655515211007746
  10. HANCOCK, J., & GONZALEZ, A. (2013). Deception in computer-mediated communication. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein, & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 363–383). De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214468.363
  11. IFANTIDOU, E. (2009). Newspaper headlines and relevance: ad hoc concepts in ad hoc contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.01610.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016
  12. JIANG, T., GOU, Q., XU, Y., ZHAO, Y., & FU, S. (2019). What prompts users to click on news headlines? A click-stream data analysis of the effects of news recency and popularity. In N. G. Taylor, C. Christian-Lamb, M. H. Martin, & B. Nardi (Eds.), Information in Contemporary Society (pp. 539–546). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_51
  13. KUIKEN, J., SCHUTH, A., SPITTERS, M., & MARX, M. (2017). Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment. Digital Journalism, 5, 1300–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.127997810.1080/21670811.2017.1279978
  14. LOCKWOOD, G. (2016). Academic clickbait: Articles with positively-framed titles, interesting phrasing, and no wordplay get more attention online. The Winnower, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.146723.3633010.15200/winn.146723.36330
  15. LOEWENSTEIN, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.7510.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
  16. LOPEZOSA, C., ORDUNA-MALEA, E., & PÉREZ-MONTORO, M. (2020). Making video news visible: Identifying the optimization strategies of the cybermedia on YouTube using web metrics. Journalism Practice, 14(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.162865710.1080/17512786.2019.1628657
  17. MCCULLOCH, G. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. Riverhead Books.
  18. MOLINA, M. D., SUNDAR, S.S., RONY, M.M.U., HASSAN, N., LE, T., & LEE, D. (2021). Does clickbait actually attract more clicks? Three clickbait studies you must read. [Conference proceedings]. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Science (pp. 1-19). CHI 2021, Yokohama, Japan. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.344575310.1145/3411764.3445753
  19. MORMOL, P. (2019). “I urge you to see this...”. Clickbait as one of the dominant features of contemporary online headlines. Social Communication, 5(2), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sc-2019-000410.2478/sc-2019-0004
  20. MULLER, D. (2021, August 17). Clickbait is unreasonably effective. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2x-HZPH5Sng
  21. OROSA, B. G., SANTORUN, S. G., & GARCÍA, X. L. (2017). Use of clickbait in the online news media of the 28 EU member countries. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1218en10.4185/RLCS-2017-1218en
  22. POTTHAST, M., GOLLUB, T., KOMOLOSSY, K., SCHUSTER, S., WEIGMANN, M., FERNANDEZ, E.P.G., HAGEN, M., & STEIN, B. (2018). Crowdsourcing a large corpus of clickbait on Twitter. [Conference proceedings]. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1498–1507). ICCL 2018, Santa Fe, New Mexico. ICCL.
  23. POTTHAST, M., KÖPSEL, S., STEIN, B. AND HAGAN, M. (2016). Clickbait detection. In Information Retrieval (pp. 810–817). [Conference proceedings]. European Conference on Information Retrieval, Padua, Italy. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_72
  24. QU, J., HIΒBACH, A.M., GOLLUB, T., & POTTHAST, M. (2018). Towards crowdsourcing clickbait labels for You-Tube videos. [Conference proceedings]. In Proceedings of the The 6th AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (pp. 1–4). HCOMP 2018, Zürich: CEUR-WS.
  25. RONY, M. M. U., HASSAN, N. AND YOUSUF, M. (2017). Diving deep into clickbaits: Who use them to what extents in which topics with what effects?. [Conference proceedings]. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference (pp. 232–239). 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference, Sydney, Australia, ACM.10.1145/3110025.3110054
  26. SADRI, S. R. (2019). Listicles and the modern news article: comparing the perceived credibility of listicles and traditional articles among millennial media consumers. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.157479410.1080/15456870.2019.1574794
  27. SCOTT, K. (2021). You won’t believe what’s in this paper! Clickbait, relevance and the curiosity gap. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.02310.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.023
  28. SPERBER, D., & WILSON, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell.
  29. SPERBER, D., & WILSON, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007
  30. TAFESSE, W. (2020). YouTube marketing: How marketers’ video optimisation practices influence video views. Internet Research, 30(6), 1689–1707. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-040610.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406
  31. VARSHNEY, D., & VISHWAKARMA, D. K. (2021). A unified approach for detection of clickbait videos on YouTube using cognitive evidence. Applied Intelligence, 51, 4214–4235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02057-910.1007/s10489-020-02057-9
  32. VIJGEN, B. (2014). The listicle: an exploring research on an interesting sharable new media phenomenon. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai – Ephemerides, 59(1), 103–122. http://studia.ubbcluj.ro/download/pdf/894.pdf
  33. ZANNETTOU, S., CHATZIS, S., PAPADAMOU, K., & SIRIVIANOS, M. (2018). The good, the bad and the bait: Detecting and characterising clickbait on YouTube. In Security and Privacy Workshops (pp. 63–69). [Symposium]. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops, San Francisco, California.10.1109/SPW.2018.00018
Language: English
Page range: 66 - 80
Published on: Jan 20, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Roy Kemm, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.