Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does CEO Gender and Independent Commissioner Moderate Executive Remuneration on Sustainability Disclosure? Evidence from Indonesia Cover

Does CEO Gender and Independent Commissioner Moderate Executive Remuneration on Sustainability Disclosure? Evidence from Indonesia

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Adel, C., Hussain, M. M., Mohamed, E. K. A., & Basuony, M. A. K. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(2), 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0118
  2. Adolph, R. (2016). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. 1–23.
  3. Adu, D. A., Flynn, A., & Grey, C. (2022). Executive compensation and sustainable business practices: The moderating role of sustainability-based compensation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 698–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2913
  4. Ahmad, G. N., Prasetyo, M. R. P., Buchdadi, A. D., Suherman, Widyastuti, U., & Kurniawati, H. (2022). The effect of CEO characteristics on firm performance of food and beverage companies in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Quality - Access to Success, 23(186), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.186.15
  5. Al-Shaer, H., Albitar, K., & Liu, J. (2023). CEO power and CSR-linked compensation for corporate environmental responsibility: UK evidence. In Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (Vol. 60, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01118-z
  6. Al Farooque, O., Buachoom, W., & Hoang, N. (2019). Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(4), 1111–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-09640-2
  7. Alhares, A. (2025). Ethical leadership and its impact on corporate sustainability and financial performance : the role of alignment with the sustainable development goals. 1–26.
  8. Almici, A. (2022). Does sustainability in executive remuneration matter? The moderating effect of Italian firms’ corporate governance characteristics. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7), 49–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2022-1694
  9. Azizah, S. N., Mandasari, P., & Adi, R. K. (2026). Do independent commissioners boost the effect of profitability on sustainability disclosure? Evidence from Indonesian palm oil companies. BIO Web of Conferences, 208, 04004. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202620804004
  10. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461950
  11. Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1762
  12. Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900402
  13. Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest journal: academy of management review academy of management review agency theory and bounded self-interest. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(3), 857–878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003%0Ahttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&%2338;AN=4369846&%2338;site=ehost-live
  14. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: a meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165
  15. Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-017-0016-5
  16. Capezio, A., Shields, J., & O’Donnell, M. (2011). Too good to be true: board structural independence as a moderator of ceo pay-for-firm-performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00895.x
  17. Costa, M., Lisboa, I., & Marzinzik, R. (2023). Is additional CEO remuneration a performance driver? DAX CEOs evidence. Risks, 11(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11070133
  18. D’Apolito, E., Iannuzzi, A. P., Labini, S. S., & Sica, E. (2019). Sustainable compensation and performance: an empirical analysis of european banks. Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2282717X19400048
  19. da Silva, A. R., do Nascimento, Í. C., Moreira, C. S., & de Melo, G. C. (2022). Sustentabilidade empresarial e remuneração executiva: análise em empresas listadas na B3. Reunir : Revista de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Sustentabilidade, 12(1), 74–86.
  20. Daniel-Vasconcelos, V., Ribeiro, M. de S., & Crisóstomo, V. L. (2022). Does gender diversity moderate the relationship between CSR committees and Sustainable Development Goals disclosure? Evidence from Latin American companies. RAUSP Management Journal, 57(4), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-02-2022-0063
  21. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506
  22. Dell’Erba, M., & Ferrarini, G. (2024). ESG & executive remuneration in Europe. In European Business Organization Law Review (Vol. 25, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-024-00318-5
  23. Devi, A. B. (2024). Sustainability management practices integrating environmental, social, and economic factors for long term success. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 9386–9401. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4570
  24. Dutschkus, F., & Lukas, C. (2022). Social relationships and group dynamics within the supervisory board and their influence on CEO compensation. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 74(2), 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00130-2
  25. Effiezal Aswadi Abdul, W., Madah Marzuki, M., Jaafar, S. B., & Masron, T. A. (2018). Board diversity and total directors’ remuneration: evidence from an emerging market. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(2), 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2016-0021
  26. Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., Mura, R., Aretz, K., Bergsma, K., Chaney, P., Denis, D., Denis, D., Durnev, A., Fracasso, A., Goergen, M., Hsu, S., Kaustia, M., Kim, S., Lesmond, D., Li, K., Lyandres, E., Malmendier, U., Michaely, R., … Zhang, F. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209. http://fortune.com/2014/06/03/number-of-fortune-500-women-ceos-reaches-historic-high/
  27. Gallén, M. L., & Peraita, C. (2024). The influence of women on boards on the relationship between executive and employee remuneration. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12030084
  28. Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Amelio, S., & Mauri, M. (2024). Sustainable strategies and value creation in the food and beverage sector: the case of large listed european companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229798
  29. Ghardallou, W. (2022). Corporate Sustainability and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of CEO Education and Tenure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063513
  30. Giannarakis, G. (2014). Corporate governance and financial characteristic effects on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0008
  31. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
  32. Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879
  33. Graham, J. R., & Mack, J. (2019). Corporate sustainability: the impact of corporate leadership gender on year over year performance. 4213, 149–183.
  34. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. G. (1984). Upper echelons: The Organization as a reflection of its top managers. In The Academy of Management Review (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 193–206). https://doi.org/10.2307/2576350
  35. Hartikainen, H., Järvenpää, M., & Rautiainen, A. (2021). Sustainability in executive remuneration - A missing link towards more sustainable firms? Journal of Cleaner Production, 324(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129224
  36. Harymawan, I., Agustia, D., Nasih, M., Inayati, A., & Nowland, J. (2020). Remuneration committees, executive remuneration, and firm performance in Indonesia. Heliyon, 6(2), e03452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03452
  37. Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., & Ruzzier, M. K. (2019). Transition towards sustainability: Adoption of eco-products among consumers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164308
  38. Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
  39. Itan, I., Sylvia, S., Septiany, S., & Chen, R. (2025). The influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on market reaction: Evidence from emerging markets. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01085-0
  40. Jamali, D., & Neville, B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: an embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0
  41. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of firms: Managerial behaviour, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial and Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=94043
  42. Jiang, X., & Akbar, A. (2018). Does increased representation of female executives improve corporate environmental investment? Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124750
  43. Johri, A., Singh, R. K., Alhumoudi, H., & Alakkas, A. (2024). Examining the influence of sustainable management accounting on sustainable corporate governance: Empirical evidence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219605
  44. Jovita, G. A., & Se Tin, S. T. (2025). Board characteristics on ESG performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36766/cn7v8a42
  45. Jurnali, T., Karina, R., Vaustine, K., Septiany, S., Azirah, N., & Mohd, B. (2025). Differences in the influence of independent directors and commissioners on the timeliness of financial reporting with audit opinion and audit quality as moderating variables. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 29(1).
  46. Jurnali, T., & Septiany, S. (2022). Role of political connections, family ownership, founders on board and firm performance. Jurnal Ipteks Terapan, 16(4), 688–700. https://doi.org/10.22216/jit.v16i4
  47. Kapse, M., Radović-Marković, M., Sharma, V., Mahajan, Y., & Hiremath, R. B. (2024). The Influence of Women’s Leadership on Organizational Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals: A Discriminant Analysis Approach. Journal of Women’s Entrepreneurship and Education, 2024(3–4), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.28934/jwee24.34.pp230-248
  48. Kartadjumena, E., & Rodgers, W. (2019). Executive compensation, sustainability, climate, environmental concerns, and company financial performance: Evidence from Indonesian commercial banks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061673
  49. Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure motives for environmentally sensitive industry: an emerging economy perspective. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2322027
  50. Klein, F. B., Chaigneau, P., & Devers, C. E. (2021). CEO gender-based termination concerns: Evidence from initial severance agreements. Journal of Management, 47(3), 567–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319887421
  51. Krisyadi, R., Chandra, B., & Angraini, J. (2025). Do effectiveness board affect sustainability performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Marginal Journal of Management Accounting General Finance and International Economic Issues, 4(3), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v4i3.1800
  52. Kroll, M. J., Ph, D., Li, Z. F., Ph, D., Ater, B., & Ph, D. (2022). The impact of female CEOs on corporate social responsibility and business performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1), 1–23.
  53. Kuo, C.-S., & Yu, S.-T. (2014). Remuneration committee, board independence and top executive compensation. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 7(2), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm7020028
  54. Lang, L., Ofek, E., & Stulz, R. M. (1996). Leverage, investment, and firm growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00842-3
  55. Lim, M. H., & Chung, J. Y. (2021). The effects of female chief executive officers on corporate social responsibility. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(5), 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3304
  56. Liou, R.-S., Ting, P.-H., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2023). The cost of foreign ownership: Voluntary sustainability reporting and financial performance in an emerging economy. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 30(3), 581–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-09-2021-0165
  57. Maas, K., & Rosendaal, S. (2016). Sustainability targets in executive remuneration: targets, time frame, country and sector specification. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1880
  58. Malesios, C., De, D., Moursellas, A., Dey, P. K., & Evangelinos, K. (2021). Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100993
  59. Michael Faulkender, Kadyrzhanova, D., Prabhala, N., & Senbet, L. (2010). Executive compensation: An overview of research on corporate practices and proposed reforms. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), 107–118. http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/faculty/faulkender/ecomp_review.pdf
  60. Mititean, P., & Ghigiu, M.-A. (2024). Understanding the role of corporate governance in driving sustainability in Europe. CECCAR Business Review, 5(3), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.37945/cbr.2024.03.07
  61. Mohammadi, S., Saeidi, H., & Naghshbandi, N. (2021). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on corporate social responsibility: evidence from the Iranian stock exchange. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(8), 2207–2236. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2019-0506
  62. Mukherjee, T., & Sen, S. S. (2022). Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India. Financial Innovation, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00344-7
  63. Musta Ani, S., Chariri, A., & Ghozali, I. (2022). The existence of independent commissioners and board remunerations in achieving firm value. International Conference on Research and Development (Icorad), 1(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.47841/icorad.v1i1.14
  64. Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727
  65. Ogrean, C., & Herciu, M. (2020). Business models addressing sustainability challenges-towards a new research Agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093534
  66. Pierli, G., Murmura, F., & Palazzi, F. (2022). Women and Leadership: How Do Women Leaders Contribute to Companies’ Sustainable Choices? Frontiers in Sustainability, 3(July), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.930116
  67. Popov, K., & Makeeva, E. (2022). Relationship between Board Characteristics, ESG and Corporate Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 16(4), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.4.2022.119-134
  68. Post, C., & Byron, K. (2014). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis Journal: Academy of Management Journal Academy of Management Journal Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Jpurnal, 1–59.
  69. Pratama, W. A., & Prasetya, A. (2017). Pengaruh sistem remunerasi terhadap kepuasan kerja dan motivasi kerja pada perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis S1 Universitas Brawijaya, 46(1), 52–60.
  70. Pratitarari, A. A., & Honggowati, S. (2025). Do independent commissioners and ownership structure influence sustainability report disclosure in Indonesia? Accounting Analysis Journal, 14(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v14i1.7299
  71. Pratiwi, B. N., Evana, E., & Oktavia, R. (2023). Characteristics of Independent Commissioners and Company Performance on the Quality of Sustainability Reports: A Literature Review. International Journal Of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM), 3(3), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v3i3.188
  72. PwC. (2023). Trends and directions of Indonesia’s sustainability report in the future. https://www.pwc.com/id/en/media-centre/press-release/2023/indonesian/tren-dan-arahsustainability-report-indonesia-di-masa-mendatang.html#:~:text=Di Indonesia%2C sustainability report telah,perusahaan tercatat sejak tahun 2020.
  73. PwC. (2024). Consumers willing to pay 9.7% sustainability premium, even as cost-of-living and inflationary concerns weigh: PwC 2024 Voice of the Consumer Survey. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2024/pwc-2024-voice-of-consumer-survey.html
  74. Qawqzeh, H. K., Endut, W. A. N. A., & Rashid, N. (2021). Board components and quality of financial reporting: Mediating effect of audit quality. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(02). https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.02.023
  75. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board diversity and CSR reporting: An Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2).
  76. Rau, H., Goggins, G., & Fahy, F. (2018). From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research. Research Policy, 47(1), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.005
  77. Riyadh, H. A., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Alfaiza, S. A. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure and board characteristics on corporate performance. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1647917
  78. Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non-family businesses. Business Ethics, 26(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12140
  79. Rostami, V., & Rezaei, L. (2022). Corporate governance and fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 1009–1026. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2021-0160
  80. Rouf, M. A., & Hossan, M. A. (2021). The effects of board size and board composition on CSR disclosure: a study of banking sectors in Bangladesh. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-06-2020-0079
  81. Saether, E. A., Eide, A. E., & Bjørgum, Ø. (2021). Sustainability among Norwegian maritime firms: Green strategy and innovation as mediators of long-term orientation and emission reduction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2382–2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2752
  82. Sahide, M. A. K., Maryudi, A., Supratman, S., & Giessen, L. (2016). Is Indonesia utilising its international partners? The driving forces behind Forest Management Units. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.04.002
  83. Sedovs, E., Volkova, T., & Ludviga, I. (2025). Does sustainability orientation drive financial success in a non-ergodic world? A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060339
  84. Septiany, S., Jurnali, T., Egnes, E., Suparman, M., & Harsono, B. (2025). Audit opinion, big4, auditor narcissism and CEO narcissism: Drivers of reporting timeliness. Jurnal Akuntansi Riset, 17(1), 067–078. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v17i1
  85. Septiany, S., Mirabelle, E., Harsono, B., Tang, S., Serly, S., & Ivone, I. (2025). CEO tenure and sustainability performance: The role of institutional ownership and board independence. Global Financial Accounting Journal, 9(01), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.37253/gfa.v9i1.10286
  86. Susanto, A., Novita, N., & Fambudi, I. N. (2024). The role of independent board of commissioners: a study ownership on esg disclosure. Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v7i2.611
  87. Trinugroho, I., Risfandy, T., Hanafi, M., & Sukamana, R. (2023). Busy commissioners and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(11), 5028–5048. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2020-0007
  88. Ullah, I., Fang, H., & Jebran, K. (2020). Do gender diversity and CEO gender enhance firm’s value? Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0085
  89. Wahab, Abdul, E. A., Marzuki, M. M., Jaafar, S. B., & Masron, T. A. (2016). Board diversity and total directors ’ remuneration : evidence from an emerging market. Pacific Accounting Review.
  90. Zhang, Y., Li, J., Deng, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Avoid or approach: How CEO power affects corporate environmental innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100250
  91. Zhu, C., Husnain, M., Ullah, S., Khan, M. T., & Ali, W. (2022). Gender diversity and firms’ sustainable performance: Moderating role of CEO duality in emerging equity market. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127177
  92. Zhu, C., Liu, X., Chen, D., & Yue, Y. (2024). Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings. Heliyon, 10(12), e32943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32943
  93. Zimek, M., & Baumgartner, R. (2017). Corporate sustainability activities and sustainability performance of first and second order. Researchgate.Net, 15(October). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martina-Zimek/publication/320612163_Corporate_sustainability_activities_and_sustainability_performance_of_first_and_second_order/links/59f04412aca272a250014539/Corporate-sustainability-activities-and-sustainability-per
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2026-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Language: English
Page range: 245 - 268
Published on: Sep 10, 2026
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Meiliana Suparman, Ria Karina, Teddy Jurnali, Sheila Septiany, Nelson Ng, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.