Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Resilience at the Local Level: Linking Digital Governance Maturity to Municipal Resilience Empirical Insights from Lithuania Cover

Resilience at the Local Level: Linking Digital Governance Maturity to Municipal Resilience Empirical Insights from Lithuania

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
  2. Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J., & Trondal, J. (2024). Robust governance in turbulent times. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009433006
  3. Aristovnik, A., Kudo, H., Murko, E., Sugawa, T., & Ravšelj, D. (2023). Investigating public governance models in Slovenia and Japan: A comparative survey on state and local government. Administrative Science and Management Public, 41, 6–26. https://doi.org/10.24818/AMP/2023.41-01
  4. Bartuseviciene, I., & Butkus, M. (2024). The effect of digital governance to stimulate the antifragile capabilities of public sector organizations. Economics & Sociology, 17(3), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-3/3
  5. Bartuseviciene, I., Butkus, M., & Schiuma, G. (2022). Modelling organizational resilience structure: Insights for assessing resilience by integrating bounce-back and bounce-forward. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2022-0180
  6. Bartuseviciene, I., Butkus, M., & Schiuma, G. (2025). Harnessing antifragility to drive innovation: Developing an organizational assessment tool for the public sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(11), 242–266.
  7. Brici, I., & Achim, M. V. (2023). Does the digitalization of public services influence economic and financial crime? Studies in Business and Economics, 18(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0025
  8. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534
  9. Carlsson, F., Matteby, M., Magnusson, J., & Berbyuk Lindstrom, N. (2023). Collective digital transformation: Institutional work in municipal collaboration. Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598536
  10. Choi, S., & Park, S. (2023). Governmental transformation in the era of the post-pandemic: Analyzing the impacts of the pandemic on organizational cultural change in government. Public Organization Review, 23(2), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00703-7
  11. Clement, J., Esposito, G., & Crutzen, N. (2023). Municipal pathways in response to COVID-19: A strategic management perspective on local public administration resilience. Administration & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221100382
  12. Daub, M., Domeyer, A., Lamaa, A., & Renz, F. (2020). Digital public services: How to achieve fast transformation at scale. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/digital-public-services-how-to-achieve-fast-transformation-at-scale
  13. Debeljak, A. & Dečman, M. (2022). Digital transformation of Slovenian urban municipalities: A quantitative report on the impact of municipality population size on digital maturity. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 15(2), 2022. 25–51. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0012
  14. Deloitte University Press. (2019). The journey to government’s digital transformation: A Deloitte Digital global survey. Deloitte Insights.
  15. Dragomir, C.-C., Zamfirache, A., Albu, R.-G., & Foris, T. (2023). Implications of crises on start-up management and ways to increase business resilience and sustainable development. Studies in Business and Economics, 18(3), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0049
  16. Eom, S.-J., & Lee, J. (2022). Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690
  17. Esposito, G., Terlizzi, A., Guarino, M., & Crutzen, N. (2024). Interpreting digital governance at the municipal level: Evidence from smart city projects in Belgium. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231167538
  18. European Commission. (2021). Digital Transition – ABC: Supporting components and enabling frameworks for local digital governance. Report to EGOV call H2020-EGOV-11-2018 .
  19. Gangneux, J., & Joss, S. (2022). Crisis as driver of digital transformation? Scottish local governments’ response to COVID-19. Data & Policy, 4, e26 https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.18
  20. Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
  21. Horák, P., & Špaček, D. (2024). Organizational resilience of public sector organizations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Czechia and key influencing factors: Use of the Nograšek and Vintar model. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(8), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2371421
  22. Irajifar, L., & Vu, K. N. (2022). Digital solutions for resilient cities: A critical assessment of resilience in smart city initiatives in Melbourne, Victoria. In A. Sharifi & P. Salehi (Eds.), Resilient smart cities: Theoretical and empirical insights (pp. 239–264). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95037-8_11
  23. Josipovic, N., & Viergutz, K. (2023). Smart solutions for municipal flood management: Overview of literature, trends, and applications in German cities. Smart Cities, 6(2), 944–964. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020046
  24. Lafioune, N., Desmarest, A., Poirier, É. A., & St-Jacques, M. (2023). Digital transformation in municipalities for the planning, delivery, use, and management of infrastructure assets: Strategic and organizational framework. Sustainable Futures, 6, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100119
  25. Lekkas, C., & Souitaris, V. (2023). Bureaucracy meets digital reality: The unfolding of urban platforms in European municipal governments. Organization Studies, 44(10), 1649–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221130857
  26. Levesque, V. R., Bell, K. P., & Johnson, E. S. (2024). The role of municipal digital services in advancing rural resilience. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101883
  27. Malicka, L., Vancová, J. & Hadačová, D. (2024). Vulnerability and resilience of Slovak municipalities in the era of austerity. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 17(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2024-0003
  28. Nolte, I. M., & Lindenmeier, J. (2023). Creeping crises and public administration: A time for adaptive governance strategies and cross-sectoral collaboration? Public Management Review, 26(11), 3104–3125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2200459
  29. Perney, M. E. P., & D’Angelo, G. (2023). Local governance support tools for disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation strategies: The EU contribution in the case study of the Municipality of Naples. Sustainability (Basel), 15(15), 11716. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511716
  30. Profiroiu, A. G., & Nastacă, C.-C. (2021). What strengthens resilience in public administration institutions? Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12(Special Issue), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-SI05
  31. Profiroiu, C. M., Negoiță, C. I., & Costea, A. V. (2023). Digitalization of public administration in EU member states in times of crisis: The contributions of the national recovery and resilience plans. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231177554
  32. Radović-Marković, M. (2025). Technology development and creative destruction: Challenges for digital transformation in entrepreneurship, work, and education. Intellectual Economics, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-25-19-1-01
  33. Roztocki, N., Strzelczyk, W., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2024). Impact of COVID-19 on e-government: A pilot study of Poland. Information Technology for Development, 31(2), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2361477
  34. Riveros-Gavilanes, J., Riveros-Gavilanes, J., Amaya-Mejía, R., Guevara-Castro, Y., Cabrera-Gonzales, L. M., & Roa-Yaguara, B. L. (2025). The triad of digital governance: Performance, participation, and digital implementation. International Review of Public Administration, 1–24. Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2025.2546190
  35. Schwoerer, K. (2025). The UX of bureaucracy: Mapping user engagement to citizen experiences of administrative burdens. International Review of Public Administration, 30(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2025.2535772
  36. Sfounis, D., Kolovos, D., Kostas, A., Tsoukalidis, I., & Karasavvoglou, A. (2024). Use of an AI-based digital prediction model for the evaluation of urban infrastructure in terms of accessibility and efficient urban movement for people with disabilities. Intellectual Economics, 18(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-24-18-2-01
  37. Shen, Y., Cheng, Y. (Daniel), & Yu, J. (2023). From recovery resilience to transformative resilience: How digital platforms reshape public service provision during and post COVID-19. Public Management Review, 25(4), 710–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2033052
  38. Spicer, Z., Lyons, J., & Calvert, M. (2023). Preparedness and crisis-driven policy change: COVID-19, digital readiness, and information technology professionals in Canadian local government. Canadian Public Administration, 66(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12517
  39. Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
  40. Uster, A. (2024). Governmental implementation of information and communication technology at the local level: Digital co-production during a crisis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 84, 69–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12657
  41. Villani, M. L., Giovinazzi, S., & Costanzo, A. (2023). Co-creating GIS-based dashboards to democratize knowledge on urban resilience strategies: Experience with Camerino Municipality. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020065
  42. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Sage.
  43. Zwolinska-Ligaj, M. A., & Guzal-Dec, D. J. (2025). ICT and local peripheral territorial systems’ resilience in crisis conditions: A study of urban-rural communes in Poland. European Research Studies Journal, 0(1), 138–161.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2026-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Language: English
Page range: 208 - 229
Published on: May 12, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Mindaugas Butkus, Ilona Bartuseviciene, Rita Toleikiene, Vita Jukneviciene, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.