Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Approaching the Entrepreneurs’ Point of View for the Public Sector Cover

Approaching the Entrepreneurs’ Point of View for the Public Sector

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Agostino, M. & Trivieri, F. (2012). Geographical indication and wine exports. An empirical investigation considering the major European producers. Food Policy Volume 46, June 2014, Pages 22-36
  2. Batsidis, A., Kontakos S. Guide to data analysis with IBM SPSS (Editor:) (7th ed.). Kleidaritmos Publications, ATHENS.
  3. Benmohamed, N., Shen, S., Gjorgievska, E. (2024) Public value creation through the use of open government data in Australian public sector: A quantitative study from employees’ perspective. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 41, Issue 2, 2024.
  4. Βoukouvala, M. (2023). Application of total quality management principles in the public sector. Case study: Ministry of Development and Investments. PhD thesis, University of Western Attica.
  5. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8, 32–47 (January).
  6. Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Kearney, C., Hisrich, R., Roche, F. (2007) Kearney, C., Hisrich, R. & Roche, F. A conceptual model of public sector corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship Management. Volume 4, pages 295–313, (2008).
  8. Funco, I. S., Vlacic, B., Dabic, M., (2023). Corporate entrepreneurship in public sector: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8 (2023) 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100343
  9. Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10, 696–706.
  10. Hartley, J., Sorensen, E., Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, V. 73, 2013.
  11. Kao, J. J. (1989). Entrepreneurship, creativity and organization. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  12. Karyotakis, K., Bakatsaki, M., Moustakis, V. (2015). Entrepreneurial Facets of Public Administration. International Scientific Conference of IT and Business-Related Research. SYNTHESIS 2015.
  13. Kassa, E. and Ning, J. (2023). A systematic review on the roles of knowledge management in public sectors: Synthesis and way forwards. Heliyon, Vol. 9, Issue 11, 2023.
  14. Khirfan, T. A. and Al Khasawneh, M. H. (2024). The impact of adopting corporate entrepreneurship in the public sector on innovative performance: the moderating role of knowledge sharing. International Journal of Business Environment Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 440 – 4692023.
  15. Klein, P., Mahoney, J., McGahan, A., Pitelis, C. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review (2010) 7, 1-1 5. doi: lO.1057/emr. 2010.1
  16. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.
  17. Moschoti, Μ (2019). Assessment of the level of service quality of public administration in Greece. PhD, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens
  18. Osborne, D. & T., G. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  19. Papasolomou, I. 2006. Can internal marketing be implemented within bureaucratic organizations? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24‘(3): 194-212.
  20. Park, K., Nie, S., Zhang, J., Asthana, S. (2024). Public relations lessons from the pandemic: A systematic review of the COVID-19 research in public relations published from 2020 to early 2023. Public Relations Review, Volume 50, Issue 2, June 2024, 102452
  21. Philipou, S. S., Soderquist, K. E., & Prastacos, G. P. 2004. Towards new public management in Greek public organizations and the path to implementation. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 4: 317-337.
  22. Scholl, H. J., Glassey, O., Janssen, M., Klievink, B., Lindgren, I., Parycek, P., Tambouris, E., Wimmer, M. A., Janowski, T., & Sá Soares, D. (Eds.) (2016). Innovation and the Public Sector,. IOS Press Vol. 23
  23. Rossidis, I. (2012). Public Administration and Business Administration: “The contribution of the science of Business Management to reform of the Public Administration and the Public Business”. PhD Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences
  24. Savvas, I. & Bassiliades, N. (2009). A process-oriented ontology-based knowledge management system for facilitating operational procedures in public administration. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 3, Part 1, April 2009, Pages 4467-4478
  25. Tsolaki, A. (2011). The contribution of the assessment framework gap to shaping perceptions of middle-level administrative executives on quality in the Region of Eastern Macedonia-Thrace. MSc thesis, University of Macedonia.
  26. Vivona, R. (2023). The new era leadership for the public sector? Entrepreneurship, effectiveness, and democracy. ISSN 14719037 Public Management Review 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2025-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 212
Published on: May 15, 2025
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Sotirios Papadopoulos, Persefoni Polychronidou, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.