Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Suboptimal Future Outcome of Consumer Decisions: A Survey on Projection Bias Cover

The Suboptimal Future Outcome of Consumer Decisions: A Survey on Projection Bias

Studies in Business and Economics
Volume 18 (2023): Issue 2 (August 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Agarwal, S., Chomsisengphet, S., Meier, S., & Zou, X. (2020). In the mood to consume: Effect of sunshine on credit card spending. Journal of Banking and Finance, 121: 105960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105960
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Augenblick, N., & Rabin, M. (2019). An experiment on time preference and misprediction in unpleasant tasks. Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 941–975. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bienenstock, S., & Ropaul, M. (2018). On the benefits of being naive: The choice of contract duration with projection bias. European Journal of Law and Economics, 45(3), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-017-9569-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Busse, M. R., Poppe, D. G., Pope, J. C., & Silva-Risso, J. (2012). Projection bias in the car and housing markets. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 18212. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18212
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Chang, T. Y., Huang, W., & Wang, Y. (2018). Something in the air: Pollution and the demand for health insurance. Review of Economic Studies, 85(3), 1609–1634. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Chatman, D. G., Broaddus, A., & Spevack, A. (2019). Are movers irrational? On travel patterns, housing characteristics, social interactions, and happiness before and after a move. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16: 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.11.0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Conlin, M., O’Donoghue, T., & Vogelsang, T. J. (2007). Projection bias in catalog orders. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1217–1249. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1217
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. DellaVigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2004). Contract design and self-control: Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 353–402. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382111
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. DellaVigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2006). Paying not to go to the gym. American Economic Review, 96(3), 694–719. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.694
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. de-Magistris, T., López-Galán, B., & Ballco, P. (2021). Do virtual reality experiments replicate projection bias phenomena? Examining the external validity of a virtual supermarket. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12443
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Dowling, K., Guhl, D., Klapper, D., Spann, M., Stich, L., & Yegoryan, N. (2020). Behavioral biases in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00699-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2014). Economic consequences of mispredicting utility. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 937–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9457-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Grubb, M. D. (2015). Overconfident consumers in the marketplace. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.4.9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Hayashi, T., & Takeoka, N. (2022). Habit formation, self-deception, and self-control. Economic Theory, 74(2), 547–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-022-01445-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312(5782), 1908–1910. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129688
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Krügel, S., & Uhl, M. (2017). Pleasing or fighting future tastes? Projection bias versus conflict of selves. Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2017: Alternative Geld- und Finanzarchitekturen–Session: Experiments–Decision Theory I, No. C18-V1. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/168170
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Laran, J. (2010). Choosing your future: Temporal distance and the balance between self-control and indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1002–1015. https://doi.org/10.1086/648380
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decsision Processes, 65(3), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American Economic Review, 90(2), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.426
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1209–1248. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552784
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press, 85–108.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. March, J. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003600
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Noor, J. (2007). Commitment and self-control. Journal of Economic Theory, 135(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2006.03.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Odermatt, R., & Stutzer, A. (2017). (Mis-)Predicted subjective well-being following life events. Zürich: Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts. www.crema-research.ch
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2001). Choice and procrastination. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 121–160. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556365
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Pollak, R. A. (1968). Consistent planning. Review of Economic Studies, 35(2): 201–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296548
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Pollak, R. A. (1970). Habit formation and dynamic demand functions. Journal of Political Economy, 78(4), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1086/259667
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Rabin, M. (2013). Incorporating limited rationality into economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(2), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.2.528
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.1.1.34
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Read, D., & Van Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2803
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulettin, 76(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031322
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. van den Bijgaart, I. M. (2017). Too slow a change? Deep habits, consumption shifts and transitory tax. Working Paper in Economics, No. 701, University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 196 - 216
Published on: Sep 20, 2023
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 times per year
Keywords:
projection bias,
misprediction,
intertemporal choice,
preference change,
consumer utility
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment,
Management, organization, corporate governance,
Business development, change management, cooperation,
Entrepreneurship

© 2023 Kármen Kovács, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 18 (2023): Issue 2 (August 2023)Next article