Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Supervisory Board’s Contribution to Corporate Strategy: Evidence from Croatian Companies Cover

Supervisory Board’s Contribution to Corporate Strategy: Evidence from Croatian Companies

By: Lana Cindrić  
Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Bezemer P.J., Peij S.P., Gregory F. Maassen G.F. (2012), The changing role of the supervisory board chairman: the case of the Netherlands (1997-2007), Journal of Management & Governance, 16(1): 37-55.10.1007/s10997-010-9128-3
  2. Bysinger, B., Hoskisson, R.E. (1990), The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy, Academy of Management Review, 15: 72-87.10.5465/amr.1990.4308231
  3. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R., Cannella, A.A. (2003), Corporate governance: Decades of dialogueand dana, Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371-382.10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
  4. Eurlich, M., Stiglbauer M. (2012), Supervisory boards and their new role as a Strategic business coach: opening the german Black box of upper echelons, International conference Improving financial institutions: the proper balance between regulation and governance” Helsinki, April 19 2012.
  5. Gad, J. (2015), The Relationship Between Supervisory Board and Management and Their Communication Processes in Publicly Listed Companies in Poland. Comparative Economic Research, 18(2): 140-160.10.1515/cer-2015-0016
  6. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  7. Johnson, J., Daily, C., Ellstrand, A. (1996) Boards of directors: A review and research agenda, Journal of Management, 22: 409-438.10.1177/014920639602200303
  8. Judge, W., Zeithaml, C. (1992), Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on boardinvolvement in the strategic decision process, Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 766-794.10.5465/256315
  9. Jungmann C. (2006), The Effectiveness of Corporate Governance in One-Tier and Two-Tier Board Systems - Evidence from the UK and Germany, European Company and Financial Law Review, 3(4): 3, 426-474.10.1515/ECFR.2006.019
  10. Maassen, G. (2002), An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models: Third print, July 2002, available at: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/8028/Maassen_9789090125916.pdf.
  11. Monks R.A.G., Minow N. (2008), Corporate governance, J. Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
  12. Mueller C.G., Barker V.L. (1997), Upper Echelons and Board Characteristicsof Turnaround and Nonturnaround Declining Firms, Journal of Business Research, 39: 119-134.10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00147-6
  13. Muth, M, Donaldson, L. (1998), Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A contingency approach, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6: 5-30.10.1111/1467-8683.00076
  14. Ogbechie C., Koufopoulo D.N., Argyropoulou M. (2009), Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making - The Nigerian perspective, Management Research News, 32(2): 169-184.10.1108/01409170910927622
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2015), OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf. retrieved June 15, 2020.
  16. Pfeffer, J. (1972), Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors - Organization and its Environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 218-228.10.2307/2393956
  17. Pfeffer, J. (1972), Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors - Organization and its Environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 218-228.10.2307/2393956
  18. Racic D., Cvijanovic V. (2006), Stanje i perspektive korporativnog upravljanja u Republici Hrvatskoj: Primjer javnih dionickih drustava, Zbornik Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu, godina 4: 205-216.
  19. Rindova, V.P. (1999), What Corporate Boards have to do with Strategy: A Cognitive Perspective, Journal of Management Studies, 36(7): 953-975.10.1111/1467-6486.00165
  20. Ruigrok, W., Peck, SI., Keller H. (2006), Board Characteristics and Involvement in Strategic Decision Making: Evidence from Swiss Companies, Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 1201-1226.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x
  21. Shabir A., Rosmini O. (2016), Basic corporate governance models: A systematic review, International Journal of Law and Management, 58 (1): 73-107.10.1108/IJLMA-10-2014-0057
  22. Stiles, P., Taylor, B. (1996), The Strategic Role of the Board, Corporate Governance, an International Review, 4(1): 3-10.10.1111/j.1467-8683.1996.tb00125.x
  23. Thomsen S. (2003), The Convergence of Corporate Governance Systems to European and Anglo- American Standards, European Business Organization Law Review, 4(1): 31-50.10.1017/S1566752903000314
  24. Tipuric, D. (2006), Nadzorni odbor i korporativno upravljanje. Sinergija: Zagreb.
  25. Tipuric, D. i sur. (2015), Korporativno upravljanje u Hrvatskoj. Ocjena kvalitete korporativnog upravljanja hrvatskih dionickih drustava SEECGAN metodologijom. Sinergija: Zagreb.
  26. Velte P. (2010), The link between supervisory board reporting and firm performance in Germany and Austria, European Journal of Law and Economics, 29: 295-331.10.1007/s10657-009-9122-x
  27. Zagreb stock exchange (2020), Croatian code of best practice, https://zse.hr/UserDocslmaaes/leaal/2019/ZSEKodeksHR07.pdf, retrieved June 15, 2020.
  28. Zahra, S., Pearce, J. (1989), Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model, Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.10.1177/014920638901500208
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2021-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 50
Published on: May 26, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2021 Lana Cindrić, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.