Have a personal or library account? Click to login
IAS/IFRS Adoption and Behavioral Dimension: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence Cover

IAS/IFRS Adoption and Behavioral Dimension: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence

By: Olfa Riahi and  Walid Khoufi  
Open Access
|May 2018

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of management review, 21(1), 254-285.10.2307/258636
  2. Aczel, A. D., & Sounderpandian, J. (2002). Complete business statistics (Vol. 545, p. 2006). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  3. Azan, W., & Bollecker, M. (2011). Management control competencies and ERP: an empirical analysis in France. Journal of Modelling in Management, 6(2), 178-199.10.1108/17465661111149575
  4. Barbu, E. (2006). L’application des normes IAS/IFRS par les entreprises françaises cotées: une décision sous influence institutionnelle. In COMPTABILITE, CONTROLE, AUDIT ET INSTITUTION (S) (pp. CD-Rom).
  5. Benaicha, B., & Hamid, F. (2013). Facteur culturel et pratiques comptables en Algerie. Revue de chercheur, 13(1), 157-172.10.12816/0005885
  6. Brewer, P. C. (1996). A Case Study of An Activity-Based Cost Management System–Implementation at Harris SemiConductor. Working Paper, August, Miami University.
  7. Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, organizations and society, 26(7), 565-596.10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00038-6
  8. Chabrak, N. (2000). La politique comptable comme comportement organisationnel: une approche sociocognitive. Congrès ASAC-IFSAM 2000.
  9. Choi, F. D., & Meek, G. K. (2005). Akuntansi Internasional. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  10. Chouchane, B. (2010). Pertinence des normes comptables IAS/IFRS au contexte culturel tunisien. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, (5), 129-140.10.3917/rsg.245.0129
  11. Clifford, M. L., E. (2000). Moving up the ladder, Business Week, November 6, 46 – 51.
  12. Cooke, T. E., & Wallace, R. O. (1990). Financial disclosure regulation and its environment: A review and further analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(2), 79-110.10.1016/0278-4254(90)90013-P
  13. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited-Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983). ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000, 17, 143-166.10.2307/2095101
  14. ENGARDIO, P., & BELTON, C. (2000).Global capitalism. Business Week, vol. 6, 40-45.
  15. Glynn, J. J., & Murphy, M. P. (1996). Public management: Failing accountabilities and failing performance review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5/6), 125-137.10.1108/09513559610146492
  16. Gray, J. (1988). National information policies: Problems and progress. London; New York: Mansell.
  17. Groebner, D. F., Shannon, P. W., Fry, P. C., & Smith, K. D. (2011). Business statistics: a decision making approach. Prentice Hall/Pearson.
  18. Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
  19. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
  20. Hopwood, A. G. (1987). The archeology of accounting systems. Accounting, organizations and society, 12(3), 207-234.10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9
  21. Judge, W., Li, S., & Pinsker, R. (2010). National adoption of international accounting standards: An institutional perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(3), 161-174.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00798.x
  22. KOSSENTINI, A., & BEN OTHMAN, H. (2014). A study of the institutional and economic determinants of IFRS adoption in emerging economies. TIJA Symposium TIJA, V.K. Zimmerman Center for International Education & Research in Accounting, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  23. Lande, E. (2006). Accrual Accounting in the public sector: Between institutional Competitiveness and the search for Legitimacy. Accounting Reform in the Public Sector: Mimicry, Fad or Necessity, 19-30.
  24. Lasmin, D. (2011). An institutional perspective on international financial reporting standards adoption in developing countries. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 15(2), 61-71.
  25. Miller, P. (1996). Dilemmas of accountability: the limits of accounting (pp. 57-69). Blackwell Publishers.
  26. Morris, R. D., & Gray, S. J. (2007, March). Corporate transparency differences in the Asian region: The feasibility of global standardization in practice. InAFAANZ Conference, Gold Coast, July.
  27. Mueller, G. G., Kelly, L., & May, R. G. (1991). Introductory financial accounting. Prentice Hall.
  28. Nobes, C., & Parker, R. H. (2008). Comparative international accounting. Pearson Education.
  29. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations (pp. p-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  30. Sy, I. T. (2011). Etude des liens entre l’appropriation des normes IAS/IFRS et les dimensions organidationnelles et managériales des services comptables (Doctoral dissertation, Conservatoire national des arts et metiers-CNAM).
  31. Touron, P. (2004). L’adoption des principes comptables généralement reconnus aux États-Unis par Saint-Gobain-Pont-à-Mousson: du conflit d’agence à la légitimité institutionnelle. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 10(3), 161-191.10.3917/cca.103.0161
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2018-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Language: English
Page range: 148 - 165
Published on: May 8, 2018
Published by: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2018 Olfa Riahi, Walid Khoufi, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.