Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relationships between epipelic diatoms, aquatic macrophytes, and water quality in Akarçay Stream, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey Cover

Relationships between epipelic diatoms, aquatic macrophytes, and water quality in Akarçay Stream, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
Volume 41 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
By: Mustafa Kargıoğlu,  Ahmet Serteser,  Ersin Kıvrak,  Yılmaz İçağa and  Muhsin Konuk  
Open Access
|Dec 2011

References

  1. [1] Ali, M.M., Murphy, K.J. & Aberneth, V.J. (1999). Macrophyte functional variables v. species assemblages as predictors of trophic status in flowing waters. Hydrobiologia, 415, 131–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:100383341935910.1023/A:1003833419359
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Anonymous (2002). Akarçay basin hydrogeology and underwater flow model (pp. 339). Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry Energy and Natural Resources General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] APHA (American Public Health Association). (1995). Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 19 thed. (pp 1268). Washington, DC.
  4. [4] Barendregt, A. & Bio, A.M.F. (2003). Relevant variables to predict macrophyte communities in running waters. Ecol. Model., 160, 205–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00254-510.1016/S0304-3800(02)00254-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Bellinger, B.J., Cocquyt, C.O. & Reilly, C.M. (2006). Benthic diatoms as indicators of eutrophication in tropical streams. Hydrobiologia, 573, 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0262-510.1007/s10750-006-0262-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Caffrey, J. (1986). Macrophytes as biological indicators of organic pollution in Irish rivers. In D.H.S. Richardson (Ed.), Biological Indicators of Pollution (pp. 77–87). Royal Irish Academy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Carbiener, R., Trémoliéres, M. & Muller, S. (1995). Vegetation of running waters and water quality: thesis, debates and prospects. Acta Botanica Gallica, 142(6), 489–531. 10.1080/12538078.1995.10515275
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Chatenet, P., Froissard, D., Cook-Moreau, J., Hourdin, P., Ghestem, A., Botineau, M. & Haury, J. (2006). Populations of Myriophyllum alterniflorum L. as bioindicators of pollution in acidic to neutral rivers in the Limousin region. Hydrobiologia, 570, 61–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0162-810.1007/s10750-006-0162-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Cox, E.J. (1996). Identification of Freshwater Diatoms From Live Material (pp.158). London: Chapman & Hall.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Daniel, H. & Haury, J. (1995). Effects of fish farm pollution on phytocenoses in an acidic river (the River Scorff, South Brittany, France). Acta Botanica Gallica, 142, 639–650. 10.1080/12538078.1995.10515287
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Daniel, H., Bernez, I. & Haury, J. (2006). Relationships between macrophytic vegetation and physical features of river habitats: the need for a morphological approach. Hydrobiologia, 570, 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0156-610.1007/s10750-006-0156-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Davis, P.H. (Ed.) (1965–1985). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. v: 1–9. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R. & Tan, K. (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. v: 10. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Dawson, F.H. (2002). Guidance for the field assessment of macrophytes of rivers within the STAR Project, from: 〈http://www.eu-star.at/frameset.htm>.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Dere, Ş., Dalkıran, N., Karacaoglu, D., Elmacı, A., Dülger, B. & Sentürk, E. (2006). Relationships among epipelic diatom taxa, bacterial abundances and water quality in a highly polluted stream catchment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112(1–3), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-0213-710.1007/s10661-006-0213-716404531
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] European Union (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327, 1–72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Gómez, N. & Licursi, M. (2001). The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology, 35(2), 173–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:101141520944510.1023/A:1011415209445
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T. & Başer, K.H.C. (Eds.) (2000). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, v: 11. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Gürbüz, H. & Kivrak, E. (2002). Use of epilithic diatoms to evaluate water quality in the Karasu River of Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology, 23(3), 239–246.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Guiry, M. D. & Guiry, G. M. (2007). AlgaeBase version 4.2. Worldwide Electronic Publishing. Galway, National University of Ireland. Retrieved 6 August 2009, from: http://www.algaebase.org.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Harding, J. P. C. (1981). Macrophytes as monitors of river quality in the Southern N. W. W. A. area. North West Water Authority, Rivers Division (Ref. No. TS-BS-81-2, 1-54).
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Haslam, S.M.(1982). A proposed method for monitoring river pollution using macrophytes. Environmental Technology Letters, 3, 19–34. 10.1080/09593338209384094
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Haslam, S.M. (1987). River Plants of Western Europe ( pp. 512). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Hasle, G.R. (1978). Some specific preparations: diatoms. In A. Sournia (Ed.), Phytoplankton Manual. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO).
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Haury, J., Peltre, M. C., Tremolieres, M., Barbe, J. & Thiebaut, G. (2002). A method involving macrophytes to assess water trophy and organic pollution: the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR) — application to different types of rivers and pollutions. In Dutartre, A. & Montel, M. H. (Eds.), Proc. 11th EWRS International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds (pp. 247–250). Moliets Et Maa, France.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Haury, J.C., Peltre, M., Trémolières, M., Barbe, J., Thiébaut, et al. (2006). A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution — the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution. Hydrobiologia, 570, 153–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0175-310.1007/s10750-006-0175-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Hering, D.,, K.F., Moog, O. & Ofenböck, T. (2006). Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: Experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives. Hydrobiologia, 566, 311–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0087-210.1007/s10750-006-0087-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Holmes, N.T.H., Boon, P.J. & Rowell, T.A. (1998). A revised classification system for British rivers based on their aquatic plant communities. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 8, 555–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<;555::AID-AQC296>3.0.CO;2-Y10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<;555::AID-AQC296>3.0.CO;2-Y
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Holmes, N. T. H., Newman, J. R., Chadd, J. R., Rouen, K. J., Saint, L. & Dawson, F.H. (1999). Mean Trophic Rank: a user’s manual. Research & Development, Technical Report E38 (pp. 134). Bristol: Environment Agency.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Husák, S., Sládecek, V. & Sládecková, A. (1989). Freshwater macrophytes as indicators of organic pollution. Acta. Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 17, 693–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aheh.1989017061210.1002/aheh.19890170612
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Hustedt, F. (1930). Die Susswasserflora Mitteleuropas. Heft 10. 2nd Edition. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). Pascher, A. (Ed.) (pp. 466). Germany: Verlag von Gustav Fischer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Janauer, G.A. & Dokulil, M (2006). Macrophytes and algae in running waters. In G. Ziglio, Siligardi M. & Flaim G. (Eds.), Biological Monitoring of Rivers. Application and Perspectives (pp. 89–109). Chichester, England: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470863781.ch610.1002/0470863781.ch6
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Kalyoncu, H., Çiçek, N. L., Akköz, C. & Yorulmaz, B. (2009). Comparative performance of ditom indices in aquatic pollution assessment. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4/10, 1032–1040.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Kargıoğlu, M. (2001). Flora and vegetation of Afyonkarahisar environs. In M. Uyan et al. (Ed), Afyonkarahisar register 1 (pp. 49–60). Afyonkarahisar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Kelly, M.G. (1998). Use of the trophic diatom index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Research., 32( 1), 236–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00157-710.1016/S0043-1354(97)00157-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] Kelly, M.G., Cazaubon, A., Coring, E., Dell’uomo, A., Ector, et al. (1998). Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. Appl. Phycol., 10, 215–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:100803320122710.1023/A:1008033201227
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] Kolher, A. (1971). Ecology of submerged macrophytes in freshwater. Berichte Der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft Bd, 84, 713–720.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986). Freshwater Flora of Central Europe, Bacillariophyceae, Band 2/1, 1. Teil: Naviculaceae (pp. 876). Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1991). Freshwater Flora of Central Europe, Bacillariophyceae, Band 2/3, 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragillariaceae, Eunoticeae (pp. 576). Stuttgart.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1991). Freshwater Flora of Central Europe, Bacillariophyceae, Band 2/4, 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae, Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema (pp. 436). Stuttgart.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1999). Freshwater Flora of Central Europe, Bacillariophyceae, Band 2/2, 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae (pp. 610). Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] Kwandrans, J., Eloranta, P., Kawecka, B. & Wojtan, K. (1998). Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland. J. Appl. Phycol., 10, 193–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:100808711425610.1023/A:1008087114256
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser (LAWA). (1980). The water quality map of the Federal Republic of Germany (pp. 16). Stuttgart.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] Lumberas, A., Olives, A., Quintana, J.R., Pardo, C. & Molina J.A. (2009). Ecology of aquatic Ranunculus communities under the Mediterranean climate. Aquatic Botany, 90, 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.06.00110.1016/j.aquabot.2008.06.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] Murtaugh, P.A. (1996). The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators. Ecological Applications, 6, 132–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/226955910.2307/2269559
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] PmnNather Khan I.S.A. (1990). Assessment of water pollution using diatom community structure and species distribution — a case study in a tropical river basin. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 75, 317–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iroh.1990075030510.1002/iroh.19900750305
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] Palmer, C. M. (1969). A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. Journal of Phycology, 5, 78–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1969.tb02581.x10.1111/j.1529-8817.1969.tb02581.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] Patrick, R. & Reimer, C.W. (1966). The Diatoms of the United States. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., Monogr., 13(1), 1–688.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] Patrick, R. & Reimer, C.W. (1975). The Diatoms of the United States. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., Monogr., 13(2), Part 1, 1–213.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] Penning, W.E., Mjelde, M., Dudley, B., Hellsten, S., Hanganu, J., Kolada, A., Berg, M., Poikane, S., Phillips, G., Willby, N. & Ecke, F. (2008). Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes. Aquatic Ecology, 42(2), 237–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9182-y10.1007/s10452-008-9182-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] Resende, P.C., Resende, P., Pardal, M., Almeida, P. & Azeiteiro, U. (2010). Use of biological indicators to assess water quality of the UI River (Portugal). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 110, 535–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1255-410.1007/s10661-009-1255-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] Riis, T., Sand-Jensen, K. & Vestergaard, O. (2000). Plant communities in lowland Danish streams: species composition and environmental factors. Aquatic Botany, 66, 255–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00079-010.1016/S0304-3770(99)00079-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] Robach, F., Thiébaut, G., Tremolieres, M. & Muller, S. (1996). A reference system for continental running waters: plant communities as bioindicators of increasing eutrophication in alkaline and acidic waters in north-east France. Hydrobiologia, 340, 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0001273610.1007/BF00012736
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] Serteser, A., Kargioğlu, M., İçağa, Y. & Konuk, M. (2008). Vegetation as an indicator of soil properties and water quality in the Akarçay Stream (Turkey). Environ. Manag., 42, 764–770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9165-810.1007/s00267-008-9165-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] Soininen, J. (2002). Responses of epilithic diatom communities to environmental gradients in some finnish rivers. Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol., 87(1), 11–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2632(200201)87:1<;11::AID-IROH11>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/1522-2632(200201)87:1<;11::AID-IROH11>3.0.CO;2-E
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] Soininen, J. & Könönen, K. (2004). Comparative study of monitoring South-Finnish rivers and streams using macroinvertebrate and benthic diatom community structure. Aquatic Ecology, 38, 63–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AECO.0000021004.06965.bd10.1023/B:AECO.0000021004.06965.bd
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] Solak, C.N. (2011). The Application of Diatom Indices in the Upper Porsuk Creek Kütahya-Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 11, 31–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.4194/trjfas.2011.010510.4194/trjfas.2011.0105
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. [58] Soylu, E.N. & Gönülol, A. (2005). Epipelic algal flora and seasonal variations of the river Yeıilirmak, Amasya, Turkey, Cryptogamie. Algologie, 26(4), 373–385.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. [59] Soyupak, S., çilesiz, A.F., Yücel, N., Torunoğlu, T., Şentürk, E. & Kaya, J. (1993). Keban Baraj Gölünde (Palu-Elazığ Arası) su kirlenmesi problem. Turk. J. Environ. Sci., 17, 301–304.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. [60] SPSS Inc.: (2001). SPSS Advanced Models 11.0 (pp.123). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. [61] Szczepocka, E. & Szulc, B. (2009). The use of benthic diatoms in estimating water quality of variously polluted rivers. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 38(1), 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10009-009-0012-x10.2478/v10009-009-0012-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. [62] Tang, T., Cai, Q. & Lıu, J. (2006). Using epilithic diatom communities to assess ecological condition of Xiangxi River system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112, 347–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-7666-610.1007/s10661-006-7666-616404550
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. [63] Ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. (2002). CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s guide: Software for Canoinical Community Ordination (version 4.5) (pp.500). Ithaca, NY, USA: Microcomputer Power.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. [64] Thiébaut, G. & Muller, S. (1999). A macrophyte communities sequence as an indicator of eutrophication and acidification levels in weakly mineralised streams in north-eastern France. Hydrobiologia, 410, 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:100382992175210.1023/A:1003829921752
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. [65] Triest, L. (2006). A comparison of macrophyte indices in headwaters of rivers in Flanders (Belgium). Hydrobiologia, 570, 153–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0175-310.1007/s10750-006-0175-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. [66] Van Dam, H., Mertens, A. & Sinkeldam, J. (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. N. J. Aquat. Ecol., 28, 117–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0233425110.1007/BF02334251
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13545-012-0009-z | Journal eISSN: 1897-3191 | Journal ISSN: 1730-413X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 74 - 84
Published on: Dec 27, 2011
Published by: University of Gdańsk
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
water quality parameters,
epipelic diatoms,
macrophytes,
ecological state,
Akarçay Stream
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other,
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other,
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2011 Mustafa Kargıoğlu, Ahmet Serteser, Ersin Kıvrak, Yılmaz İçağa, Muhsin Konuk, published by University of Gdańsk
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 41 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)Next article