Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluating similarity of radial increments around tree stem circumference of European beech and Norway spruce from Central Europe Cover

Evaluating similarity of radial increments around tree stem circumference of European beech and Norway spruce from Central Europe

Geochronometria
Volume 41 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
By: Michal Bošeľa,  Róbert Sedmák,  Róbert Marušák,  Denisa Sedmáková,  Rudolf Petráš and  Milan Barna  
Open Access
|Mar 2014

References

  1. [1] Assmann E, 1968. Náuka o výnose lesa (The principles of forest yield study). Príroda, Bratislava. 488 pp (in Slovak).
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Bakker JD, 2005. A new, proportional method for reconstructing historical tree diameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35(10): 2515–2520, DOI 10.1139/x05-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x05-13610.1139/x05-136
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Bieker D and Rust S, 2010a. Electric resistivity tomography shows radial variation of electrolytes in Quercus robur. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40(6): 1189–1193, DOI 10.1139/X10-076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X10-07610.1139/X10-076
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Bieker D and Rust S, 2010b. Non-destructive estimation of sapwood and heartwood width in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Silva Fennica 44(2): 267–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.15310.14214/sf.153
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Bigler Ch, Gričar J, Bugmann H and Čufar K, 2004. Growth patterns as indicators of impending tree death in silver fir. Forest Ecology and Management 199(2–3): 183–190, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.01910.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.019
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Bijak S, 2010. Tree-ring chronology of Silver fir and its dependence on climate of the Kaszubskie lakeland (Northern Polan). Geochronometria 35(1): 91–94, DOI: 10.2478/v10003-010-0001-9. 10.2478/v10003-010-0001-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Biondi F, 1992. Development of a tree-ring network for the Italian Peninsula. Tree Ring Bulletin 52: 15–29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Biondi F and Qeadan F, 2008. A theory-driven approach to tree-ring standardization: defining the biological trend from expected basal area increment. Tree-Ring Research 64(2): 81–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3959/2008-6.110.3959/2008-6.1
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Bošeľa M, Kulla L and Marušák R, 2011. Detrending ability of several regression equations in tree-ring research: a case study based on tree-ring data of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.]). Journal of Forest Science 57(11): 491–499. 10.17221/134/2010-JFS
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Bošeľa M, Petráš R, Sitková Z, Priwitzer T, Pajtík J, Hlavatá H, Sedmák R and Tobin B, 2014. Possible causes of the recent rapid increase in the radial increment of silver fir in the Western Carpathians. Environmental Pollution 184: 211–221, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.03610.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.03624060740
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Bouriaud O and Popa I, 2009. Comparative dendroclimatic study of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and Silver fir in the Vrancea Moutains, Eastern Carpathian Mountains. Trees 23: 95–106, DOI 10.1007/s00468-008-0258-z. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0258-z10.1007/s00468-008-0258-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Bräker OU and Baumann E, 2006. Growth reactions of sub-alpine Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) following one-sided light exposure (case study at Davos “Lusiwald”). Research report. Tree-ring Research 62(2): 67–73, DOI 10.3959/1536-1098-62.2.67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-62.2.6710.3959/1536-1098-62.2.67
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Brienen RJW and Zuidema PA, 2005. Relating tree growth to rainfall in Bolivian rain forests: a test for six species using tree ring analysis. Oecologia 146(1): 1–12, DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0160-y. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0160-y10.1007/s00442-005-0160-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Brus DJ, Hengeveld GM, Walvoort DJJ, Goedhart PW, Heidema AH, Nabuurs GJ and Gunia K, 2012. Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe. European Journal of Forest Research 131(1): 145–157, DOI 10.1007/s10342-011-0513-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0513-510.1007/s10342-011-0513-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Büntgen U, Frank DC, Nievergelt D and Esper J, 2006. Summer temperature variations in the European Alps, A.D. 755–2004. Journal of Climate 19(21): 5606–5623, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3917.1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3917.110.1175/JCLI3917.1
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Büntgen U, Frank DC, Kaczka RJ, Verstege A, Zwijacz-Kozica T and Esper J, 2007. Growth responses to climate in a multi-species tree-ring network in the Western Carpathian Tatra Mountains, Polan and Slovakia. Tree Physiology 27(5) 689–702, DOI 10.1093/treephys/27.5.689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.5.68910.1093/treephys/27.5.689
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Carrer M and Urbinati C, 2006. Long-term change in the sensitivity of tree-ring growth to climate forcing in Larix decidua. New Phytologist 170(4): 861–872, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01703.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01703.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01703.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Čejková A and Kolář T, 2009. Extreme radial growth reaction of Norway spruce along an altitudinal gradient in the Šumava Mountains. Geochronometria 33: 41–47, DOI 10.2478/v10003-009-0012-6. 10.2478/v10003-009-0012-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Cook ER and Kairiukstis LA, 1990. Methods of dendrochronology: Applications in the environmental sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 394 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7879-010.1007/978-94-015-7879-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Dittmar Ch, Zech W and Elling W, 2003. Growth variations of Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different climatic and environmental conditions in Europe-a dendroecological study. Forest Ecology and Management 173(1–3): 63–78, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00816-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00816-710.1016/S0378-1127(01)00816-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Dittmar Ch, Eißing T and Rothe A, 2012. Elevation-specific tree-ring chronologies of Norway spruce and Silver fir in Southern Germany. Dendrochronologia 30(2): 73–83, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2011.01.013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2011.01.01310.1016/j.dendro.2011.01.013
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Ďurský J, Škvarenina J, Minďáš J and Miková A, 2006. Regional analysis of climate change impact on Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) growth in Slovak mountain forests. Journal of Forest Science 52(7): 306–315. 10.17221/4512-JFS
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Esper J, Frank DC, Wilson RJS, Büntgen U and Treydte K, 2007. Uniform growth trends among central Asian low- and high-elevation juniper tree sites. Trees 21(2): 141–150, DOI 10.1007/s00468-006-0104-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-006-0104-010.1007/s00468-006-0104-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Fang K, Gou X, Chen F, Li J, D’Arrigo R, Cook E, Yang T, Liu W and Zhang F, 2010. Tree growth and time-varying climate response along altitudinal transects in central China. European Journal of Forest Research 129(6): 1181–1189, DOI 10.1007/s10342-010-0408-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0408-x10.1007/s10342-010-0408-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Feliksik E and Wilczyński S, 2009. The effect of climate on tree-ring chronologies of native and nonnative tree species growing under homogeneous site conditions. Geochronometria 33: 49–57, DOI 10.2478/v10003-009-0006-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10003-009-0006-410.2478/v10003-009-0006-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Fritts HC, 1976. Tree rings and climate. Academic Press, New York, NY, 576 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Fulé PZ, Covington WW and Moore MM, 1997. Determining reference conditions for ecosystems management in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecological Applications 7(3): 895–908, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0895:DRCFEM]2.0.CO;2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0895:DRCFEM]2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Giurgiu V, 1957. Ob opredeleniji prirosta nasaždenij (On the estimation of forest growth). Lesnoje choziajstvo 9: 27–32 (in Russian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Giurgiu V, 1967. Studiul cresterilor la arboreta (Study of the growth increment of forests). Bucuresti, Editure Agro-Silvicǎ, 322 pp. (in Romanian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Gray ST, Fastie CL, Jackson ST and Betancourt JL, 2004. Tree-ring-based reconstruction of precipitation in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, since 1260 A.D.. Journal of Climate 17(19): 3855–3865, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017〈3855:TROPIT〉2.0.CO;2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<;3855:TROPIT>2.0.CO;210.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<;3855:TROPIT>2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Grissino-Mayer HD, 2003. A Manual and Tutorial for the Proper Use of an Increment Borer. Tree-Ring Research 59(2): 63–79.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Gutierrez E, 1988. Dendroecological study of Fagus sylvatica L. In the Montseny Mountains (Spain). Acta Oecologica-Oecologia Plantarum 9: 301–309.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Hasenauer H, Nemani RR, Schadauer K and Running SW, 1999. Forest growth response to changing climate between 1961 and 1990 in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management 122(3): 209–219, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00010-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00010-910.1016/S0378-1127(99)00010-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Hökkä H, Salminen H and Ahti E, 2012. Effect of temperature and precipitation on the annual diameter growth of Scots pine on drained peatlands and adjacent mineral soil sites in Finland. Dendrochronologia 30(2): 157–165, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2011.02.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2011.02.00410.1016/j.dendro.2011.02.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Holmes R, 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43: 69–78.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] Hughes MK, Kelly PM, Pilcher JR and Lamarche VC, 1982. Climate from tree rings. Cambridge University Press, New York, 223 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051176000610.1017/CBO9780511760006
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] Kaennel M and Schweingruber FH, 1995. Multilingual Glossary of Dendrochronology. Terms and Definitions in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese and Russian. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Haupt, Stuttgart.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] Koprowski M and Zielski A, 2006. Dendrochronology of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) from two range centres in lowland Poland. Trees 20: 383–390, DOI 10.1007/s00468-006-0051-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-006-0051-910.1007/s00468-006-0051-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] Kurth H, 1959. Der gegenwärtige Stand der Zuwachsmessungen in der Forsteinrichtung der DDR (The state of the art of growth measurement in forest management in GDR). Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 7: 301–304 (in German).
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] LeBlanc DC, 1990. Relationships between breast-height and whole-stem growth indices for red spruce on Whiteface Mountains, New York. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20(9): 1399–1407, DOI 10.1139/x90-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x90-18510.1139/x90-185
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] Liese W and Dadswell HF, 1959. Über den Einfluß der Him-melsrichtung auf die Länge von Holzfäsern und Tracheiden (Influ-ence of shading on the length of wood fibers and tracheids). Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff 17: 421–427 (in German). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0260538410.1007/BF02605384
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] Mäkinen H, 1998. Effect of thinning and natural variations in bole roundness in Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.). Forest Ecology and Management 107(1–3): 231–239, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00335-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00335-610.1016/S0378-1127(97)00335-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] Mäkinen H and Vanninen P, 1999. Effect of sample selection on the environmental signal derived from tree-ring series. Forest Ecology and Management 113(1): 83–89, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00416-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00416-210.1016/S0378-1127(98)00416-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] McDowell N, Phillips N, Lunch C, Bond BJ and Ryan MG, 2002. An investigation of hydraulic limitation and compensation in large, old Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiology 22: 763–774, DOI 10.1093/treephys/22.11.763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.11.76310.1093/treephys/22.11.76312184980
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] Metsaranta JM and Lieffers VJ, 2009. Using dendrochronology to obtain annual data for modelling stand development: a supplement to permanent sample plots. Forestry 82(2): 163–173, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpn051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn05110.1093/forestry/cpn051
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] Muzika RM, Guyette RP, Zielonka T and Liebhold AM, 2004. The influence of O3, NO2 and SO2 on growth of Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica in the Carpathian Mountains. Environmental Pollution 130(1): 65–71, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.02110.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.02115046841
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] Pilcher JR, Schweingruber FH, Kairiukstis L, Shiyatov S, Worbes M, Kolischuk VG, Vaganov EA, Jagels R and Telewski FW, 1990. Primary data, in: Cook, E.R., Kairiukstis, L.A. (Eds.), Methods of dendrochronology: Applications in the environmental sciences. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, pp. 23–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7879-0_210.1007/978-94-015-7879-0_2
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] Pretzsch H, 2009. Forest dynamics, growth and yield. From measurement to model. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.13.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, available at: http://www.R-project.org.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] Rozas V, 2003. Tree age estimates in Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur: testing previous and improved methods. Plant Ecology 167(2): 193–212, DOI 10.1023/A:1023969822044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:102396982204410.1023/A:1023969822044
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] Schweingruber FH, 1996. Tree rings and environment. Dendroecology. Berne, Paul Haupt Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] Schweingruber FH, 2007. Wood structure and environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 279 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] Siostrzonek E, 1958. Radialzuwachs und flächenzuwachs. (Radial increment and basal-area increment). Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 77: 237–254 (in German). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0182139710.1007/BF01821397
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] Speer JH, Orvis KH, Grissino-Mayer HD, Kennedy LM and Horn SP, 2004. Assessing the dendrochronological potential of Pinus occidentalis Swartz in the Cordillera Central of the Dominican Republic. The Holocene 14(4): 563–569, DOI 10.1191/0959683604hl732rp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0959683604hl732rp10.1191/0959683604hl732rp
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] Stephenson NL, 2000. Estimated ages of some large giant sequoias: General Sherman keeps getting younger. Mandroño 47(1): 61–67.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] Šmelko Š, 1965. Základy určovania hrúbkového prírastku stromov a porastov (Basis for the estimation of the radial increment of trees and stands). SAV, Bratislava, 176 pp (in Slovak).
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] Šmelko Š, 1982. Biometrické zákonitosti rastu a prírastku lesných stromov a porastov (Biometric principles of growth and increment of trees and stands). VEDA, Bratislava, 184 pp (in Slovak).
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. [58] Taylor AM, Gartner BL and Morrell JJ, 2002. Heartwood formation and natural durability — A review. Wood and Fiber Science 34(4): 587–611.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. [59] Tognetti R, Cherubini P and Innes JL, 2000. Comparative stem growth rates of Mediterranean trees under background and naturally en-hanced ambient CO2 concentrations. New Phytologist 146(1): 59–74, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00620.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00620.x10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00620.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. [60] Tröltzsch K, Van Brusselen J and Schuck A, 2009. Spatial occurence of major tree species groups in Europe derived from multiple data sources. Forest Ecology and Management 257(1): 294–302, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.01210.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. [61] Van Der Maaten-Theunissen M, Kahle HP and Van Der Maaten E, 2013. Drought sensitivity of Norway spruce is higher than that of silver fir along an altitudinal gradient in southwestern Germany. Annals of Forest Science 70(2): 185–193, DOI 10.1007/s13595-012-0241-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0241-010.1007/s13595-012-0241-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. [62] Vyskot M, (ed.), 1971. Základy růstu a produkce lesů. Státní Zemědelské Nakladatelství (The principles of forest growth and production). Praha. 440 pp (in Czech).
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. [63] Weber P, Bugmann H, Fonti P and Rigling A, 2008. Using a retrospective dynamic competition index to reconstruct forest succession. Forest Ecology and Management 254(1): 96–106, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.03110.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.031
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. [64] Wigley TML, Briffa KR and Jones PD, 1984. On the average of correlated time series, with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 23(2): 201–213, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023〈0201:OTAVOC〉2.0.CO;2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<;0201:OTAVOC>2.0.CO;210.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<;0201:OTAVOC>2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. [65] Woodall CW, 2008. When is one core per tree sufficient to characterize stand attributes? Results of a Pinus ponderosa case study. Research report. Tree-Ring Research 64(1): 55–60, DOI 10.3959/2007-10.1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3959/2007-10.110.3959/2007-10.1
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. [66] Young-In P and Spiecker H, 2005. Variations in the tree-ring structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies) under contrasting climates. Dendrochronologia 23(2): 93–104, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2005.09.002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2005.09.00210.1016/j.dendro.2005.09.002
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-013-0152-3 | Journal eISSN: 1897-1695
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 136 - 146
Published on: Mar 20, 2014
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
relative tree-ring width,
dendroclimatology,
basal area reconstruction,
core sampling,
detrending
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2014 Michal Bošeľa, Róbert Sedmák, Róbert Marušák, Denisa Sedmáková, Rudolf Petráš, Milan Barna, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 41 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)Next article