Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Field gamma spectrometry, Monte Carlo simulations and potential of non-invasive measurements Cover

Field gamma spectrometry, Monte Carlo simulations and potential of non-invasive measurements

Geochronometria
Volume 39 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
By: Guillaume Guérin and  Norbert Mercier  
Open Access
|Dec 2011

References

  1. [1] Agostinelli S, et al. (Geant4 Collaboration), 2003. Geant4 — a simulation toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 506: 250–303, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-810.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Aitken MJ, 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. London, Academic Press: 359pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Aitken MJ, Clark PA and Gaffney CF, 1985. Beta and gamma gradients. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 10(4–6): 647–653, DOI 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90071-7. 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90071-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Allison J., et al. (Geant4 Collaboration), 2006. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Sciences 53: 270–278, DOI 10.1109/TNS.2006.869826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.86982610.1109/TNS.2006.869826
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Allyson JD and Sanderson DCW, 1998. Monte Carlo simulations of environmental airborne gamma-spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 38(3): 259–282, DOI 10.1016/S0265-931X(97)00040-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(97)00040-410.1016/S0265-931X(97)00040-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Allyson JD and Sanderson DCW, 2001. Spectral deconvolution and operational use of stripping ratios in airborne radiometrics. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 53(3): 351–363, DOI 10.1016/S0265-931X(00)00141-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(00)00141-710.1016/S0265-931X(00)00141-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Aznar MC, Nathan RP. Murray AS and Botter-Jensen L, 2003. Deter-mination of differential dose rates in a mixed beta and gamma field using shielded Al2O3: C results of Monte Carlo modelling. Radiation Measurements 37(4–5): 329–334, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00003-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00003-910.1016/S1350-4487(03)00003-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Bailiff IK and Slim HA, 2008. Development of reference database for gamma dose assessment in retrospective luminescence dosimetry. Radiation Measurements 43(2–6): 859–863, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.12.020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.12.02010.1016/j.radmeas.2007.12.020
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Bargholz K and Korsbech U, 1997. Conversion of Airborne Gamma Ray Spectra to Ground Level Air Kerma Rates. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 73(1–4): 127–130. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032115
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Benke RR and Kearfott KJ, 2001. An improved in situ method for determining depth distributions of gamma-ray emitting radionuclides. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 463(1–2): 393–412, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00449-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00449-110.1016/S0168-9002(01)00449-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Brennan BJ, Schwarcz HP and Rink J, 1997. Simulation of the gamma radiation field in lumpy environments. Radiation Measurements 27(2): 299–305, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00133-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00133-310.1016/S1350-4487(96)00133-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Bucher B, Rybach L and Schwarz G, 2008. Search for long-term radiation trends in the environs of Swiss nuclear power plants. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99(8): 1311–1318, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.04.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.04.00410.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.04.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Fain J, Erramli H, Miallier D, Montret M and Sanzelle S, 1985. Environmental gamma dosimetry using TL dosimeters: Efficiency and absorption calculations. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 10(4–6): 639–646, DOI 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90070-5. 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90070-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Guérin G and Mercier N, 2011. Determining gamma dose rates by field gamma spectroscopy in sedimentary media: results of Monte Carlo simulations. Radiation Measurements 46(2): 190–195, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.10.003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.10.00310.1016/j.radmeas.2010.10.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Guimarães CC, Moralles M and Okuno E, 2008. Performance of GEANT4 in dosimetry applications: Calculation of X-ray spectra and kerma-to-dose equivalent conversion coefficients. Radiation Measurements 43(9-10): 1525–1531, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.07.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.07.00110.1016/j.radmeas.2008.07.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] ICRU, 1994. In situ Gamma-ray Spectrometry in the environment. Report by the International Committee for Radiological Units No. 53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Kastlander J and Bargholtz C, 2005. Efficient in situ method to determine radionuclide concentration in soil. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 547(2–3): 400–410, DOI 10.1016/j.nima.2005.03.143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.03.14310.1016/j.nima.2005.03.143
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Korun M, Likar A, Lipoglavsek M, Martincic R and Pucelj B, 1994. In situ measurement of Cs distribution in soil. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 93(4): 485–491, DOI 10.1016/0168-583X(94)95638-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(94)95638-310.1016/0168-583X(94)95638-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Liritzis Y and Galloway RB, 1980. A new technique for calibrating a NaI(Tl) scintillometer used to measure gamma dose rates in archaeological sites. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 174(3): 593–597, DOI 10.1016/0029-554X(80)91115-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(80)91115-510.1016/0029-554X(80)91115-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Løvborg L and Kirkegaard P, 1974. Response of 3″ × 3″ NaI(Tl) detectors to terrestrial gamma radiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 121(2): 239–251, DOI 10.1016/0029-554X(74)90072-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(74)90072-X10.1016/0029-554X(74)90072-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Løvborg L, Bøtter-Jensen L, Kirkegaard P and Christiansen EM, 1979. Monitoring of soil natural radioactivity with portable gamma-ray spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 167(2): 341–348, DOI 10.1016/0029-554X(79)90021-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(79)90021-110.1016/0029-554X(79)90021-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Mercier N, Valladas H, Joron J-L, Schiegl S, Bar-Yosef O and Weiner S, 1995. Thermoluminescence dating and the problem of geo-chemical evolution of sediments. A case study: the Mousterian levels at Hayonim. Israel Journal of Chemistry 35: 137–141. 10.1002/ijch.199500021
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Mercier N and Falguères C, 2007. Field gamma dose rate measurement with a NaI (Tl) detector: re-evaluation of the “threshold” technique. Ancient TL 25: 1–4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Miallier D, Guérin G, Mercier N, Pilleyre T and Sanzelle S, 2009. The Clermont radiometric reference rocks: a convenient tool for dosimetric purposes. Ancient TL 27: 37–44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Miller KM, Shebell P and Klemic GA, 1994. In situ gamma ray spectrometry for the measurement of uranium in surface soils. Health Physics 67(2): 140–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199408000-0000410.1097/00004032-199408000-00004
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Murray AS, Bowman SGE and Aitken MJ, 1978. Evaluation of the gamma dose rate contribution. PACT 2: 84–96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Nathan R, Thomas PJ, Murray AS and Rhodes EJ, 2003. Environmental dose rate heterogeneity of beta radiation and its implications for luminescence dating: Monte Carlo modelling and experimental validation. Radiation Measurements 37(4–5): 305–313, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00008-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00008-810.1016/S1350-4487(03)00008-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Nathan RP and Mauz B, 2008. On the dose rate estimate of carbonate-rich sediments for trapped charge dating. Radiation Measurements 43(1): 14–25, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.12.012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.12.01210.1016/j.radmeas.2007.12.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Sanderson DCW and Placido F, 1985. Scottish vitrified forts: back-ground and potential for TL dating. Nuclear Tracks 10(4–6): 799–809, DOI 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90093-6. 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90093-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Thummerer S and Jacob P, 1998. Determination of depth distributions of natural radionuclides with in situ gamma ray spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 416(1): 161–178, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00636-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00636-610.1016/S0168-9002(98)00636-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Tyler AN, 1999. Monitoring anthropogenic radioactivity in salt marsh environments through in situ gamma ray spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 45(3): 235–252, DOI 10.1016/S0265-931X(98)00110-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(98)00110-610.1016/S0265-931X(98)00110-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Tyler AN, 2004. High accuracy in situ radiometric mapping. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 72(1–2): 195–202, DOI 10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00202-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00202-910.1016/S0265-931X(03)00202-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Tyler AN, Sanderson DCW and Scott EM, 1996. Estimating and accounting for 137Cs source burial through in situ gamma spectrometry in salt marsh environments. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 33(3): 195–212, DOI 10.1016/0265-931X(95)00098-U. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(95)00098-U10.1016/0265-931X(95)00098-U
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Tyler AN and Copplestone D, 2007. Preliminary results from the first national in situ gamma spectrometry survey of the United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 17(2–3): 97–106, DOI 10.1016/0265-931X(92)90019-P. 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.01.029
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Zombori P, Andrrasi A and Nemeth I, 1992. In situ gamma spectrometric measurements of the contamination in some selected settlements of Byelorussia (BSSR), Ukraine (UkrSSR) and the Russian Federation (RSFSR). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 96(1–3): 94–102, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.01.029. 10.1016/0265-931X(92)90019-P
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-011-0056-z | Journal eISSN: 1897-1695
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 47
Published on: Dec 25, 2011
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
luminescence,
dose rate,
Monte-Carlo simulations,
non-invasive measurements
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2011 Guillaume Guérin, Norbert Mercier, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 39 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)Next article