Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Time-Resolved Energy Attribution Model Comparison for Accurate and Transparent Corporate Carbon Reporting Cover

Time-Resolved Energy Attribution Model Comparison for Accurate and Transparent Corporate Carbon Reporting

Open Access
|Oct 2026
Read online

References

  1. Gillenwater M. Examining the impact of GHG accounting principles. Carbon Management 2022:13(1):550–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2022.2135238
  2. Comello S. D., Reichelstein J., Reichelstein S. Corporate carbon reporting: Improving transparency and accountability. One Earth 2023:6(7):803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.06.002
  3. Hummel K., Jobst D. An Overview of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Legislation in the European Union. Accounting in Europe 2024:21(3):320–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145
  4. Dolge K., Blumberga D. Key Factors Influencing the Achievement of Climate Neutrality Targets in the Manufacturing Industry: LMDI Decomposition Analysis. Energies 2021:14(23):8006. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238006
  5. European Commission. Eurostat. Complete energy balances (nrg_bal_c). 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2026]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nrg_bal_c/default/table
  6. IEA. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023, IEA, Paris. [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2026]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023
  7. Phan N. A., Hellsmark H., Göransson L., Johnsson F. Electrifying tensions: Stakeholder narratives to electrification of industry and transport in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science 2025:126:104142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104142
  8. European Environment Agency (EEA). Greenhouse gas emission intensity of electricity generation in Europe. EEA Indicator Report, 2025.
  9. Lund P. D., Skytte K., Bolwig S., Bolkesjö T. F., Bergaentzlé C., Gunkel P. A., Kirkerud J. G., Klitkou A., Koduvere H., Gravelsins A., Blumberga D., Söder L. Pathway Analysis of a Zero-Emission Transition in the Nordic-Baltic Region. Energies 2019:12(17):3337. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173337
  10. Pakere I., Freimanis R., Alena-Ozolina S., Asaris P., Demurtas A., Gorner M., Yearwood J. Cost-Optimal Policy Strategies for Reaching Energy Efficiency Targets and Carbon Neutrality. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):999–1014. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0073
  11. Göransson L., Lund P. D., Vuille F., Widén J. The benefit of collaboration in the North European electricity system. Energies 2019:12(24):4648. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244648
  12. ENTSO-E. Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2022: System needs and investment opportunities for the European electricity grid. European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity. [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2026]. Available: https://eepublicdownloads.blob.core.windows.net/public-cdn-container/tyndpdocuments/TYNDP2022/public/system-needs-report.pdf
  13. Ergemen Y. E., Haldrup N., Rodríguez-Caballero C. V. Common long-range dependence in a panel of hourly Nord Pool electricity prices and loads. Energy Economics 2016:60:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.008
  14. Bertolini M., Duttilo P., Lisi F. Accounting carbon emissions from electricity generation: A review and comparison of emission factor-based methods. Applied Energy 2025:392:125992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125992
  15. Leerbeck K., Bacher P., Junker R. G., Goranovic G., Corradi O., Ebrahimy R., Tveit A., Madsen H. Short-term forecasting of CO₂ emission intensity in power grids by machine learning. Applied Energy 2020:277:115527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115527
  16. Tranberg B., Corradi O., Lajoie B., Gibon T., Staffell I., Andresen G. B. Real-time carbon accounting method for the European electricity markets. Energy Strategy Reviews 2019:26:100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100367
  17. Allena-Ozolina S., Jaunzems D., Pakere I., Blumberga A., Bazbauers G. Decarbonisation Pathways of Industry in TIMES Model. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):318–330. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0023
  18. IEA. Global EV Outlook 2025, IEA, Paris, 2025. [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2026]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025
  19. Lee Y., et al. Electrification pathways toward transport decarbonization with a systematic review. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2025:27:7855–7877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03321-7
  20. Santos R. C. O. Systematic literature review of electric vehicles in electrical system expansion planning. Energy Reports 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104500
  21. Hawkins T. R., Singh B., Majeau-Bettez G., Strømman A. H. Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2013:17:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x
  22. Santero N., et al. Electrifying light vehicles in the United States shows emission reduction potential for all vehicle types and powertrains. Communications Sustainability 2026:1:23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-025-00032-4
  23. Alwosheel A., Koroma M. S. Context matters: Life cycle emissions and policy implications of electric vehicles in evolving carbon-intensive energy systems. Energy 2025:338:138845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138845
  24. Mendziņš, K., & Barisa, A. Electric vs. Internal Combustion Vehicles: A Multi-Regional Life Cycle Assessment Comparison for Environmental Sustainability. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2024:28(1):855–862. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2024-0065
  25. Besseau R., et al. (2024). Assessing the carbon intensity of e-fuel production: A temporal analysis of electricity supply. Applied Sciences 2024:14(22):10299. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210299
  26. Hąbek P. Evaluating ESG Software Solutions for Sustainability Reporting in the Manufacturing Sector. Management Systems in Production Engineering 2025:33(3):420–432. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2025-0041
  27. Garzón Marsal A. Definition of a software tool for carbon footprint reporting (Master’s thesis). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2026]. Available: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstreams/61714fe0-b980-428f-baed-ca09b5163754/download
  28. Jiusto S. The differences that methods make: Cross-border power flows and accounting for carbon emissions from electricity use. Energy Policy 2006:34(17):2915–2928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.002
  29. Ryan N. A., Johnson J. X., Keoleian G. A. Comparative assessment of models and methods to calculate grid electricity emissions. Environmental Science & Technology 2016:50(17):8937–8953. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05216
  30. Bialek J. Tracing the flow of electricity. IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 1996:143(4):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:19960461
  31. Kirschen D., Allan R., Strbac G. Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 1997:12(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.574923
  32. Schäfer, M., Tranberg, B., Jones, D., & Weidlich, A. (2020). Tracing carbon dioxide emissions in the European electricity markets. International Conference on European Electricity Market, arXiv2008.00893. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM49802.2020.9221928
  33. AIB (Association of Issuing Bodies). European Residual Mix. 2026. [Online]. [Accessed 14.10.2026]. Available: https://www.aib-net.org/facts/european-residual-mix
  34. Meng X., Wu J., Zhang Y., Ren J., Yue D., Manzardo A. Critical review: a standardized blueprint for green certificate integration in life cycle assessment. Carbon Footprints 2025:4(4):29. https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2025.51
  35. Holzapfel P., Bach V., Finkbeiner M. Electricity accounting in life cycle assessment: the challenge of double counting. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2023:28:771–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02158-w
  36. Hirth L., Mühlenpfordt J., Bulkeley M. The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform – A review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform. Applied Energy 2018:225:1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.048
  37. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 543/2013 of 14 June 2013 on submission and publication of data in electricity markets. Official Journal of the European Union 2013 L: 163
  38. Wernet G., et al. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2016:21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
  39. Stadler K., Wood R., Bulavskaya T., Södersten C.-J., Simas M., Schmidt S., Usubiaga A., Acosta-Fernández J., Kuenen J., Bruckner M., Giljum S., Lutter S., Merciai S., Schmidt J. H., Theurl M. C., Plutzar C., Kastner T., Eisenmenger N., Erb K.-H., de Koning A., Tukker A. EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2018:22:502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12715
  40. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard. World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2015.
  41. Holzapfel P., et al. Replacing location-based electricity consumption with market-based residual mixes in background data to avoid possible double counting: a quantitative analysis of effects and challenges. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2024:29:1279–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02294-x
  42. Electricity Maps. Methodology. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.10.2026]. Available: https://electricitymaps.com/methodology
  43. ISO. ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. 2006.
  44. ISO. ISO 14067: Greenhouse gases – Carbon footprint of products – Requirements and guidelines for quantification. 2018a.
  45. ISO. ISO 14064-1: Greenhouse gases – Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals, 2018b.
  46. ISO. ISO 14069: Greenhouse gases – Quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions for organizations, 2013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2026-0038 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 (formerly 2255-8845) | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 558 - 569
Submitted on: Mar 10, 2026
Accepted on: Oct 16, 2026
Published online: Oct 28, 2026
Published in print: Jan 1, 2026
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Aleksandrs Šcedrovs, Pauls Sondors, Maksims Feofilovs, Agris Kamenders, Francesco Romagnoli, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.