References
- Mendis E., Kim S. K. Chapter 1 - Present and future prospects of seaweeds in developing functional foods. Adv Food Nutr Res 2011:64:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387669-0.00001-6
- Morais T. et al. Marine Science and Engineering Seaweed Potential in the Animal Feed: A Review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2020:8(8):559. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080559
- Kumari R., Kaur I., Bhatnagar A. K. Enhancing soil health and productivity of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. using Sargassum johnstonii Setchell & Gardner as a soil conditioner and fertilizer. J Appl Phycol 2013:4(25):1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9933-y
- Zhao Y., Bourgougnon N., Lanoisellé J. L., Lendormi T. Biofuel Production from Seaweeds: A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2022:15(24):9395. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249395
- Lourenço-Lopes C. et al. Metabolites from Macroalgae and Its Applications in the Cosmetic Industry: A Circular Economy Approach. Resources 2020:9(9):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9090101
- Lomartire S., Gonçalves A. M. M. An Overview of Potential Seaweed-Derived Bioactive Compounds for Pharmaceutical Applications. Marine Drugs 2022:20(2):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020141
- FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. FAO, Rome, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en
- AquaInvest Platform. Global seaweed new and emerging markets report 2023. 2023.
- European Commission. Communication from the Commission: Towards a strong and sustainable EU algae sector. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/publications/communication-commission-towards-strong-and-sustainable-eu-algae-sector_en
- European Commission. EU4Algae. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://maritime-forum.ec.europa.eu/theme/blue-economy-and-fisheries/blue-economy/eu4algae_en
- Oceanium. KELP-EU Project. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://oceanium.world/kelp-eu/
- Barbier M., Charrier B., Araujo R., Holdt S. L., Jacquemin B., Rebours C. Phycomorph European Guidelines for a Sustainable Aquaculture of Seaweeds. Pegasus. https://doi.org/10.21411/2c3w-yc73
- Kreischer L., Zee G. U. Factsheet: Market potential of European, cultivated seaweeds for food applications.
- Mac Monagail M., Cornish L., Morrison L., Araújo R., Critchley A. T. Sustainable harvesting of wild seaweed resources. European Journal of Phycology 2017:52(4):371–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365273
- Delaney A., Frangoudes K., Ii S. A. Chapter 2 - Society and Seaweed: Understanding the Past and Present. Seaweed in Health and Disease Prevention 2016:7–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802772-1.00002-6
- Vance C., Pollard P., Maguire J., Sweeney J., Murphy F. Sustainable scale-up of Irish seaweed production: Quantifying potential environmental, economic, and social impacts of wild harvesting and cultivation pathways. Algal Res 2023:75:103294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2023.103294
- Spillias S. et al. The empirical evidence for the social-ecological impacts of seaweed farming. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation 2023:2(2):e0000042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000042
- Albrecht M. A Billion-Euro Industry? (De-)territorialisation Processes of Norway's Seaweed Farming Assemblage. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2023:115(5):628–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12609
- Garrido S. R. Social Life-Cycle Assessment: An Introduction. Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies 2017:253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10089-2
- Lindkvist M., Ekener E. Analysis of human well-being as the area of protection in social life cycle assessment. Int. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2023:28:1428–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02213-6
- Soltanpour Y., Peri I., Temri L. Area of protection in S-LCA: human well-being or societal quality. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2019:24(11):2073–2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01620-y
- Backes J. G., Traverso M. Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Construction Industry: Systematic Literature Review and Identification of Relevant Social Indicators for Carbon Reinforced Concrete. Environ Dev Sustain 2024:26(3):7199–7233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03005-6
- Benoit Norris C. et al. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations 2020. 2020.
- International Organization of Standardization, ISO 14075:2024 – Environmental management – Principles and framework for social life cycle assessment. 2024.
- Bučas M., Daunys D., Olenin S. Recent distribution and stock assessment of the red alga Furcellaria lumbricalis on an exposed Baltic Sea coast: Combined use of field survey and modeling methods. Oceanologia 2009:51(3):341–359. https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.51-3.359
- Romagnoli F., Paoli R., Arias A., Entrena-Barbero E., Ilmjӓrv T., Elvevold K., Moreira M. T. Furcellaria lumbricalis macroalgae cascade biorefinery: a Life Cycle Assessment study in the Baltic Sea Region. J Clean Prod 2024:478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143861
- Paoli R., Bjarnason B., Ilmjärv T., Romagnoli F. Off-Shore and On-Shore Macroalgae Cultivation and Wild Harvesting: An LCA-Based Evaluation from Baltic Sea Region Case Studies. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):606–626. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0045
- Krupska J., Psuty I., Szulecka O. Guide to macroalgae cultivation and use in the Baltic Sea Region. Gdynia, 2021.
- Martin G., Paalme T., Torn K. Growth and production rates of loose-lying and attached forms of the red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis and Coccotylus truncatus in Kassari Bay, the West Estonian Archipelago Sea. Hydrobiologia 2006:554:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1010-y
- Norris G. Chapter 8: The Social Hotspots Database Context of the SHDB. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287215286
- Zamani B., Sandin G., Svanström M., Peters G. M. Hotspot identification in the clothing industry using social life cycle assessment – opportunities and challenges of input-output modelling. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2018:23(3):536–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1113-x
- Norris C. B., Aulisio D., Norris G. A. Working with the Social Hotspots Database – Methodology and findings from 7 social scoping assessments. In Leveraging Technology for a Sustainable World – Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29069-5_98
- Seghetta M., Hou X., Bastianoni S., Bjerre A. B., Thomsen M. Life cycle assessment of macroalgal biorefinery for the production of ethanol, proteins and fertilizers – A step towards a regenerative bioeconomy. J Clean Prod 2016:137:1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.195
- Tonucci L., Mascitti A., Ferretti A. M., Coccia F., d’Alessandro N. The Role of Nanoparticle Catalysis in the Nylon Production. Catalysts 2022:12(10):1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101206
- Martínez-Blanco J. et al. Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 2014:69:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044
- Tragnone B. M., Serreli M., Arzoumanidis I., Pelino C. A., Petti L. Using the Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment (PSILCA) database for product comparison: Confetti case study. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2023:28(8):1031–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02173-x