Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Decarbonisation Pathways for Medium- and Small-Sized Ports: A Systems Thinking Approach Cover

Decarbonisation Pathways for Medium- and Small-Sized Ports: A Systems Thinking Approach

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Monios J., Wilmsmeier G., Tello G. A. M., Pomaska L. A new conception of port governance under climate change. Journal of Transport Geography 2024:120:103988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103988
  2. A practical guide to decarbonising ports Catalogue of innovative solutions. EIT. [Online]. [Accessed 28.04.2025]. Available: https://www.eit.europa.eu/library/practical-guide-decarbonising-ports-catalogue-innovative-solutions
  3. World Ports Sustainability program (WPSP) charter. Mar. 2018. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2025]. https://sustainableworldports.org/wp-content/uploads/wpsp-declaration.pdf
  4. Introduction to IMO. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2025]. Available: https://www.imo.org/en/About/Pages/Default.aspx
  5. ESPO. World Ports Sustainability Program launched. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2025]. Available: https://www.espo.be/news/world-ports-sustainability-program-launched
  6. European Green Deal. Consilium. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2025]. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/european-green-deal/
  7. European Commission. European Climate Law. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2025]. Available: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/european-climate-law_en
  8. Agarwala N. Is hydrogen a decarbonizing fuel for maritime shipping? Marit. Technol. Res. 2024:6(4):271244. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2024.271244
  9. Valencia will be first port in Europe to use hydrogen energy in its container terminals. Fuel Cells Bulletin 2019:2:3–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2859(19)30044-6
  10. Bicer Y., Dincer I. Clean fuel options with hydrogen for sea transportation: A life cycle approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2018:43(2):1179–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.157
  11. Wu X., Zhang Y., Chen Y. A Dynamic Programming Model for Joint Optimization of Electric Drayage Truck Operations and Charging Stations Planning at Ports. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2023:24(11):11710–11719. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3285668
  12. Chung Ee J. Y. Prospect of Emission Reduction Standard for Sustainable Port Equipment Electrification. IJE 2018:31(8):1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2018.31.08b.25
  13. Musolino G., Rindone C., Vitetta A. Passengers and freight mobility with electric vehicles: A methodology to plan green transport and logistic services near port areas. Transportation Research Procedia 2019:37:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.208
  14. Verbeeck J. et al. The e-harbours journey: Point of arrival; smart energy networks in the North Sea Region. [Online]. [Accessed 30.03.2025]. Available: https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/248756
  15. Dhupia J., Adnanes A., Lee K., Kennedy L. Electrification of Port and Port Operations. At International Maritime Technology Conference. Singapore, 2011.
  16. Fahdi S., Elkhechafi M., Hachimi H. Green Port in Blue Ocean: Optimization of Energy in Asian Ports. In 2019 5th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA), Kenitra, Morocco. IEEE 2019:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOA.2019.8727615
  17. Hermans M., Haynes W., Childs J. Port of Portland’s Changes in Maintenance Dredging: Barge Unloading and the New Dredged Material Rehandling Facility. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) conference proceedings for Dredging ’02. 2012:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/40680(2003)95
  18. Sdoukopoulos E., Boile M., Tromaras A., Anastasiadis N. Energy Efficiency in European Ports: State-Of-Practice and Insights on the Way Forward. Sustainability 2019:11(18):4952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184952
  19. Acciaro M. et al. Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management 2014:41(5):480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.932926
  20. Yang Y.-C., Lin C.-L. Performance analysis of cargo-handling equipment from a green container terminal perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2013:23:9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.03.009
  21. Boile M., Theofanis S., Sdoukopoulos E., Plytas N. Developing a Port Energy Management Plan: Issues, Challenges, and Prospects. Transportation Research Record 2016:2549(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2549-03
  22. He J. Berth allocation and quay crane assignment in a container terminal for the trade-off between time-saving and energy-saving. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2016:30(3):390–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.04.006
  23. Martínez-Moya J., Vazquez-Paja B., Gimenez Maldonado J. A. Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions of port container terminal equipment: Evidence from the Port of Valencia. Energy Policy 2019:131:312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.044
  24. Maslaric M., Bojic S., Mircetic D., Nikolicic S., Medenica Todorovic R. Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the Port Areas: A Case Study. Sustainability 2024:16(2):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020514
  25. Styhre L., Winnes H. Chapter 6 – Emissions from Ships in Ports. In Green Ports, Bergqvist R., Monios J., Eds., Elsevier, 2019:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814054-3.00006-2
  26. Chang D., Fang T., He J., Lin D. Defining Scheduling Problems for Key Resources in Energy-Efficient Port Service Systems. Scientific Programming 2016:1:7053962. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7053962
  27. Sha M. et al. Scheduling optimization of yard cranes with minimal energy consumption at container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2017:113:704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.03.022
  28. Hu H., Li Man., Wang T. Berth allocation and quay crane-yard truck assignment considering carbon emissions in port area. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 2019:11(2/3):216. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2019.10020672
  29. Gibbs D., Rigot-Muller P., Mangan J., Lalwani C. The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions. Energy Policy 2014:64:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.024
  30. Misra A., Panchabikesan K., Gowrishankar S. K., Ayyasamy E., Ramalingam V. GHG emission accounting and mitigation strategies to reduce the carbon footprint in conventional port activities – a case of the Port of Chennai. Carbon Management 2017:8(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1275815
  31. Tichavska M., Tovar B., Gritsenko D., Johansson L., Jalkanen J. P. Air emissions from ships in port: Does regulation make a difference? Transport Policy 2019:75:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.003
  32. Mamatok Y., Jin C. An integrated framework for carbon footprinting at container seaports: the case study of a Chinese port. Maritime Policy & Management 2017:44(2):208–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1262077
  33. You S., Lee G., Ritchie S., Saphores J.-D., Sangkapichai M., Ayala R. Air Pollution Impacts of Shifting San Pedro Bay Ports Freight from Truck to Rail in Southern California. University of California Transportation Center, University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers, Jan. 2010. https://doi.org/10.3141/2162-04
  34. Kotowska I. Policies Applied by Seaport Authorities to Create Sustainable Development in Port Cities. Transportation Research Procedia 2016:16:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.023
  35. Acciaro M., Ghiara H., Cusano M. I. Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities. Energy Policy 2014:71:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.013
  36. Du K., Monios J., Wang Y. Chapter 11 – Green Port Strategies in China. In Green Ports, Bergqvist R., Monios J. Eds., Elsevier, 2019:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814054-3.00011-6
  37. Yun P. E. N. G., Xiangda L. I., Wenyuan W. A. N. G., Ke L. I. U., Chuan L. I. A simulation-based research on carbon emission mitigation strategies for green container terminals . Ocean Engineering 2018:163:288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.054
  38. Pukazhselvan D., Sandhya K. S., Fagg D. P., Blaabjerg F. The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2026:226:116286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116286
  39. Bicer Y., Dincer I. Clean fuel options with hydrogen for sea transportation: A life cycle approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2018:43(2):1179–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.157
  40. Pivetta D., Dall’Armi C., Sandrin P., Bogar M., Taccani R. The role of hydrogen as enabler of industrial port area decarbonization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024:189:113912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113912
  41. Mousavi A. et al. Impact of particulate matter (PM) emissions from ships, locomotives, and freeways in the communities near the ports of Los Angeles (POLA) and Long Beach (POLB) on the air quality in the Los Angeles county. Atmospheric Environment 2018:195:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.044
  42. Geerlings H., Van Duin R. A new method for assessing CO2-emissions from container terminals: a promising approach applied in Rotterdam. Journal of Cleaner Production 2011:19(6–7):657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.012
  43. Van Duin J. H. R., Geerlings H. Estimating CO2 footprints of container terminal port-operations. Int. J. SDP 2011:6(4):459–473. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V6-N4-459-473
  44. Alasali F., Haben S., Becerra V., Holderbaum W. Day-ahead industrial load forecasting for electric RTG cranes. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2018:6(2):223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-018-0394-4
  45. Hong-lei W., Wei G., Jian-Xin C. The Dynamic Power Control Technology for the High Power Lithium Battery Hybrid Rubber-Tired Gantry (RTG) Crane. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019:66(1):132–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2816011
  46. Ramos V., Carballo R., Álvarez M., Sánchez M., Iglesias G. A port towards energy self-sufficiency using tidal stream power. Energy 2014:71:432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.098
  47. Latief R., Pei Y., Ahmad Javeed S., Sattar U. Environmental sustainability in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Countries: The role of sustainable tourism, renewable energy and technological innovation. Ecological Indicators 2024:162:112011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112011
  48. Hentschel M., Ketter W., Collins J. Renewable energy cooperatives: Facilitating the energy transition at the Port of Rotterdam. Energy Policy 2018:121:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.014
  49. Notteboom T., Lam J. S. L. The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports. Sustainability 2018:10(9):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093318
  50. Dobers K. et al. Sustainable logistics hubs: greenhouse gas emissions as one sustainability key performance indicator. Transportation Research Procedia 2023:72:1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.572
  51. Allan I. Good practice case study: how LED smart lighting can help ports to save energy. Green Inland Ports. [Online]. [Accessed 30.10.2025]. Available: https://green-inland-ports.eu/good-practice-case-study-how-led-smart-lighting-can-help-ports-to-save-energy/
  52. Van Duin J. h. R., Geerlings H., Froese J., Negenborn R. R. Towards a method for benchmarking energy consumption at terminals: In search of performance improvement in yard lighting. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration 2017:1:212–224. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V1-N2-212-224
  53. Winnes H., Styhre L., Fridell E. Reducing GHG emissions from ships in port areas. Research in Transportation Business & Management 2015:17:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.10.008
  54. Moon D. S.-H., Woo J. K. The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives. Maritime Policy & Management 2014:41(5):444–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.931607
  55. Moon D. S.-H., Woo J. K. The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives. Maritime Policy & Management 2014:41(5):444–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.931607
  56. Johnson H., Styhre L. Increased energy efficiency in short sea shipping through decreased time in port. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2015:71:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.008
  57. Kontovas C., Psaraftis H. N. Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain: operational models and policies. Maritime Policy & Management 2011:38(4):451–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.588262
  58. Ortega Piris A., Díaz-Ruiz-Navamuel E., Pérez-Labajos C. A., Oria Chaveli J. Reduction of CO2 emissions with automatic mooring systems. The case of the port of Santander. Atmospheric Pollution Research 2018:9(1):76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.07.002
  59. Ship Emissions Toolkit Guide No.2: Incorporation of MARPOL Annex VI into national law. [Online]. [Accessed 31.03.2025]. Available: https://glomeep.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ship_emissions_toolkit-g2-online.pdf
  60. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Ed., “Summary for Policymakers,” in Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  61. Alamoush A. S. Trends in port decarbonisation research: are we reinventing the wheel? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2024:71:101478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101478
  62. Alamoush A. S., Ballini F., Ölçer A. I. Ports’ technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve energy efficiency: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2020:160:111508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111508
  63. Wealer B. et al. Kernenergie und Klima. Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5573719.
  64. Foretich A., Zaimes G. G., Hawkins T. R., Newes E. Challenges and opportunities for alternative fuels in the maritime sector. Maritime Transport Research 2021:2:100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100033
  65. Hegger M., Saraceni A. Smart Port Sustainability: A Business Intelligence Framework for CO2 Reduction in Cargo Truck Operations. In: Thürer, M., Riedel, R., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments. APMS 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer, Cham., 2024:728. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_21
  66. ESPO Environmental Report 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 30.03.2025]. Available: https://www.espo.be/media/ESPO%20Environmental%20Report%202024.pdf
  67. Cargo throughput in the port of Rotterdam slightly decreased in 2024 | Port of Rotterdam. [Online]. [Accessed 17.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/cargo-throughput-port-rotterdam-slightly-decreased-2024
  68. portofhamburg.com, Container Throughput. The official website of the Port of Hamburg. [Online]. [Accessed 17.03.2025]. Available: https://www.hafen-hamburg.de/en/current/statistics/container-throughput/
  69. Port of Rotterdam. [Online]. [Accessed 17.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en
  70. Strategy and research. Port of Rotterdam. [Online]. [Accessed 17.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/port-future/energy-transition/strategy-and-research
  71. pers-por-versie-2022-versie-10.pdf. [Online]. [Accessed 19.03.2 025]. Available: https://www.ecoports.com/uploads/pers/134/204/pers-por-versie-2022-versie-10.pdf
  72. Efficiency and infrastructure. Port of Rotterdam. [Online]. [Accessed 19.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/port-future/energy-transition/efficiency-and-infrastructure
  73. PCI and PMI selection process. [Online]. [Accessed 19.03.2025]. Available: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/infrastructure/projects-common-interest-and-projects-mutual-interest/pci-andpmi-selection-process_en
  74. Porthos CO2 transport network. [Online]. [Accessed 19.03.2025]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/cinea/project_fiches/cef/cef_energy/12.3-0022-NL-W-M-20.pdf
  75. Oh S., Al-Juaied M. Decarbonizing industrial hubs and clusters: Towards an integrated framework of green industrial policies. Energy Research & Social Science 2024:118:103777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103777
  76. A new energy system. Port of Rotterdam. [Online]. [Accessed 19.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/port-future/energy-transition/a-new-energy-system
  77. Port of Rotterdam. Resource Transition Circular by 2050. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/sites/default/files/2022-07/position-paper-pillar-3.pdf
  78. Port of Rotterdam. A new raw materials and fuel system. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/port-future/energy-transition/new-raw-materials-and-fuel-system
  79. AFIR. Sustainable Ships. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2025]. Available: https://www.sustainable-ships.org/rules-regulations/afir
  80. Shore-based power in Rotterdam. Port of Rotterdam. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2025]. Available: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/port-future/energy-transition/ongoing-projects/shore-power-rotterdam
  81. Emissieloos varen met Zero Emission Services voor de binnenvaart. Zero Emission Services. [Online]. [Accessed 20.03.2025]. Available: https://zeroemissionservices.nl/en/homepage/
  82. Hamburg port authority sustainability report.pdf. [Online]. [Accessed 17.02.2025]. Available: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6155b5bdada6ea1708c2c74d/t/6342d1302ceea01a8bd2fbbc/1725278536726/Sustainability_Report_2020.pdf
  83. Sterman J. Business Dynamics, System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. [Online]. [Accessed 17.02.2025]. http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=013598/(100), vol. 19, Jan. 2000.
  84. Blumberga A. Ed., System dynamics for environmental engineering students. Riga: Technical University, 2011.
  85. OECD, Environmental Impacts of International Shipping: The Role of Ports. OECD, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097339-en
  86. Le Berre L. et al. Measurement report: In-depth characterization of ship emissions during operations in a Mediterranean port, EGUsphere [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2903
  87. Psaraftis H. N., Kontovas C. A. Decarbonization of Maritime Transport: Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel? Sustainability 2020:13(1):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010237
  88. O. US EPA, Ports Primer: 7.2 Air Emissions. [Online]. [Accessed 01.11.2025]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/ports-initiative/ports-primer-72-air-emissions
  89. Last year containerised cargo was handled the most. Freeport of Riga Authority. [Online]. [Accessed 27.04.2025]. Available: https://rop.lv/en/news/last-year-containerised-cargo-was-handled-most
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 102 - 121
Submitted on: Jun 13, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jan 6, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 6, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Aivis Kļaviņš, Vladimirs Kirsanovs, Maksims Feofilovs, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.