Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Climate Change Effects on Aquaculture: A Case Study of Latvia Cover

Climate Change Effects on Aquaculture: A Case Study of Latvia

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 29 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)
By: Agnese Eizenberga and  Liga Proskina  
Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Orsag M., Meitner J., Fischer M. Estimating Heat Stress Effects on the Sustainability of Traditional Freshwater Pond Fishery Systems under Climate Change. Water 2023:15(8):1523. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081523
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Zdanek R., Lososova J., Mraz J. Long-term trends in the economy viability of pond aquaculture in Central Europe – The example of Czechia. Aquaculture 2025:598:742069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.742069
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Galappaththi E., Ichien S., Hyman A., Aubrac C., Ford J. Climate change adaptation in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture 2020:12(4):2160−2176. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12427
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Reid G., Gurney-Smith H., Marcogliese D., Knowler D., Benfey T., Garber A., Silva S. Climate change and aquaculture: considering biological response and resources. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 2019:11:569−602. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00332
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Soto D., León‐Muñoz J., Dresdner J., Luengo C., Tapia F., Garreaud R. Salmon farming vulnerability to climate change in southern Chile: understanding the biophysical, socioeconomic and governance links. Reviews in Aquaculture 2019:11(2):354−374. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12336
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Thúy P., Friðriksdóttir R., Weber C., Viðarsson J., Papandroulakis N., Baudron A., Aschan M. Guidelines for cocreating climate adaptation plans for fisheries and aquaculture. Climatic Change 2021:164:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03041-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Fitzer S., McGill R., Gabarda S., Hughes B., Dove M., O’Connor W., Byrne M. Selectively bred oysters can alter their biomineralization pathways, promoting resilience to environmental acidification. Global Change Biology 2019:25(12):4105–4115. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14818
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Cubillo A. M.., Silva J. L., Farereira J. G. Direct effects of climate change on productivity of European aquaculture. Aquaculture International 2021:29(1–2):1561–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00694-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Stelzenmüller V., Töpsch S., Galparsoro I., Gubbins M., Miller D., Murillas A., G. A GIS-based tool for an integrated assessment of spatial planning trade-offs with aquaculture. Science of The Total Environment 2018:627:1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.133
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Arango C., Gimpel A., Lomboy C., Box S. Financial inclusion to build economic resilience in small-scale fisheries Marine Policy 2020:118:103982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103982
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Vistarte L., Pubule J., Balode L., Kaleja D., Bumbiere K. An Assessment of the Impact of Latvian New Common Agriculture Policy: Transition to Climate Neutrality. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):683–695. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0050
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Ministry of Agriculture. Latvian Aquaculture Development Plan 2021–2027. 2021. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2025]. Available: https://www.pkc.gov.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/NAP2027__ENG.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Glencross B. D. Exploring the nutritional demand for essential fatty acids by aquaculture species. Reviews in Aquaculture 2009:1(2):71–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2009.01006.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Ringø E., Zhou Z., Vecino J. L. G., Wadsworth S., Romero J., Krogdahl Å., Merrifield D. L. Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. Aquaculture Nutrition 2016:22(2):219–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12346
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Xie J., Hu L., Tang J., Wu X., Li N., Yuan Y., Guo Z. Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice–fish coculture system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011:108(50):E1381–E1387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111043108
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Akinwole A. O., Faturoti E. O. Biological performance of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) cultured in recirculating system. Aquacultural Engineering 2007:36(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2006.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Macias-Corral M., Samani Z., Hanson A., Smith G., Funk P., Yu H., Longworth J. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and agricultural waste and the effect on biogas production. Bioresource Technology 2008:99(17):8288–8293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.043
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Kostevica V., Dzikevics M. Bibliometric Analysis of the Climate Change Impact on Energy Systems. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):950−963. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0069
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Gozlan R. E., Britton J. R., Cowx I., Copp G. H. Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. Journal of Fish Biology 2010:76(4):751–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02566.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Osipov S., Puckin A. The influence of temperature conditions on the yield of biogas and methane, which is obtained from aquaculture waste. Environment Technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference 2023:1:166–170. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2023vol1.7198
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Pilvere I., Upīte I., Nipers A., Pilvere A. Productivity in bioeconomy industries in Latvia. 24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM 2024, 2024:24:597–606. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s21.74
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Allison E. H., Bassett H. R. Climate change in the oceans: Human impacts and responses. Science 2015:350:6262:778–782. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac8721
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kalnbaļķīte A., Poca P., Laktuka K., Lauka D., Blumberga D. The role of environmental communication in advancing sustainability in fisheries and aquaculture: a case study of Latvia. Sustainability 2023:15(23):16418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316418
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. De Silva S. S., Soto D. Climate change and aquaculture: Potential impacts, adaptation and mitigation. In Cochrane K., De Young C., Soto D., Bahri T. (Eds.). Climate change implications for fisheries and aquaculture: Overview of current scientific knowledge (pp. 151–212). FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 530. Rome: FAO.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2025-0050 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 756 - 764
Submitted on: Apr 23, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 12, 2025
Published on: Nov 10, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Aquaculture farms,
biodiversity conservation,
climatic environments,
sustainability
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2025 Agnese Eizenberga, Liga Proskina, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)Next article