Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of Potential Environmental Impact: Synthetic and Natural Binders Cover

Assessment of Potential Environmental Impact: Synthetic and Natural Binders

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Sen B., Tam N., Maharjan R., Maharjan A. K., Talukdar G. The Shift Towards Green Construction : A Review of Environmental Management Strategies and Sustainable Materials in Developed Countries. Tropical Environment, Biology, and Technology 2024:2(2):80–92. https://doi.org/10.53623/tebt.v2i2.482">https://doi.org/10.53623/tebt.v2i2.482
  2. Bashir M. T., Khan A. B., Khan M. M. H., Rasheed K., Saad.S, Farid F. Evaluating the Implementation of Green Building Materials in the Construction Sector of Developing Nations. Journal of Human, Earth and Future 2024:5(3):528–542. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2024-05-03-015">https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2024-05-03-015
  3. Attahiru Y. B., Aziz M. M. A., Kassim K. A., Shahid S., Bakar W. A. W. A., Nsashruddin T. F., Rahman F. A., Ahamed M. I. A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:101:600–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.036">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.036
  4. Marzouk M., Abdelhamid M., Elsheikh M. Selecting sustainable building materials using system dynamics and ant colony optimization. Journal of Environmental Engineering & Landscape Management 2013:21(4):237–247. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2013.788506">https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2013.788506
  5. Nodehi M., Aguayo F., Madey N., Zhou L. A Comparative Review of Polymer, Bacterial-based, and Alkali-Activated (also Geopolymer) Binders: Production, Mechanical, Durability, and Environmental impacts (life cycle assessment (LCA)). Construction and Building Materials 2024:422:135816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135816">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135816
  6. Farinha C. B., Brito J. D., Veiga R., Fernández J. M., Jiménez J. R., Esquinas A. R. Wastes as Aggregates, Binders or Additions in Mortars: Selecting Their Role Based on Characterization. Materials 2018:11(3):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11030453">https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11030453
  7. Sanytsky M., Kropyvnytska T., Fic S., Ivashchyshyn H. Sustainable low-carbon binders and concretes. The International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters ICSF 2020:166. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016606007">https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016606007
  8. Scherz M., Hoxha E., Maierhofer D., Kreiner H., Passer A. Strategies to improve building environmental and economic performance: an exploratory study on 37 residential building scenarios. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2023:28:828-842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02073-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02073-6
  9. Boros A., Tőzsér D. The Emerging Role of Plant-Based Building Materials in the Construction Industry – A Bibliometric Analysis. Resources 2023:12(10):124. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12100124">https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12100124
  10. Nighot N. S., Kumar R. A comprehensive study on the synthesis and characterization of eco-cementitious binders using different kind of industrial wastes for sustainable development. Developments in the Built Environment 2023:14:100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100135">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100135 .
  11. Liu S., Li H., Wang W., Rong C., Yang M., Wang Y., Wang J., Xu Y., Liang D., Xie Y. PVA-enhanced green synthesis of CMC-based lithium adsorption films. Carbohydrate Polymers 2025:349:122973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122973">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122973
  12. Huang B., Gao X., Xu X., Song J., Geng Y., Sarkis J., Fishman T., Kua H., Nakatani J. A Life Cycle Thinking Framework to Mitigate the Environmental Impact of Building Materials. One Earth 2020:3(5):564–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.010
  13. Shi C., Qu B., Provis J. L. Cement and Concrete Research Recent progress in low-carbon binders. Cement and Concrete Research 2019:122:227–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.009
  14. Vilas R., Gadhave I., Dhawale P. V. State of Research and Trends in the Development of Polyvinyl Acetate-Based Wood Adhesive. Open Journal of Polymer Chemistry 2022:12(1):13–42. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpchem.2022.121002">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpchem.2022.121002
  15. Nyashina G. S., Dorokhov V. V, Shvedov D. K., Strizhak P. A. Effects of the type and proportion of a binder on the quality and combustion of fuel pellets. Biomass and Bioenergy 2025:199:107934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107934">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107934
  16. Agbi G., Uguru H. Assessing the Impact of Cassava Starch on the Structural Properties of Sandcete Blocks Produced from Recycled Paper. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology 2021.
  17. Kulshreshtha Y., Schlangen E., Jonkers H. M., Vardon P. J., Van Paassen L. A. CoRncrete: A corn starch based building material. Construction and Building Materials 2017:154:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.184">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.184
  18. Syazmini R., Ghani M., Lee M. D., Razali S. M. A Comprehensive Review of Sustainable Benefit of Cassava Starch and Its Potential in Wood-Based and Lignocellulosic Materials. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Industrial Application 2023:2(1):1–10.
  19. Paassen V. CoRncrete: A corn starch based building material. Construction and Building Materials 2017:154:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.184">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.184
  20. Samieadel A., Schimmel K., Fini E. H. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-modified binder and conventional asphalt binder. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2018:20(1):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1467-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1467-1
  21. Usubharatana P., Phungrassami H. Carbon footprint of cassava starch production in North-Eastern Thailand. Procedia CIRP 2015:29:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.031">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.031
  22. Papong S., Malakul P. Life-cycle energy and environmental analysis of bioethanol production from cassava in Thailand. Bioresource Technology 2010:101(1):112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.006
  23. Vilches A., Garcia-Martinez A., Sanchez-Montañes B. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings 2017:135:286–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042
  24. Bottausci S., Ungureanu-Comanita E. D., Gavrilescu M., Bonoli A. Environmental impacts quantification of PVC production. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 2021:20(10):1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2021.158">https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2021.158
  25. Ramakrishnan R., Kim J. T., Roy S., Jayakumar A. Recent advances in carboxymethyl cellulose-based active and intelligent packaging materials: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2024:259:129194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.129194">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.129194
  26. Churam T., Usubharatana P., Phungrassami H. Sustainable Production of Carboxymethyl Cellulose: A Biopolymer Alternative from Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Leaves. Sustainability 2024:16(6):2352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062352">https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062352
  27. Lansche J., Awiszus S., Latif S., Müller J. Potential of biogas production from processing residues to reduce environmental impacts from cassava starch and crisp production-a case study from Malaysia. Applied Sciences 2020:10(8):2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082975">https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082975
  28. Lilavanichakul A., Yoksan R. Development of Bioplastics from Cassava toward the Sustainability of Cassava Value Chain in Thailand. Sustainability 2023:15(20):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014713">https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014713
  29. Zhang R., Ma S., Li L., Zhang M., Tian S., Wang D., Liu K., Liu H., Zhu W., Wang X. Comprehensive utilization of corn starch processing by-products: A review. Grain & Oil Science and Technology 2021:4(3):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaost.2021.08.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaost.2021.08.003
  30. Yu J. K., Moon Y. S. Corn starch: Quality and quantity improvement for industrial uses. Plants 2022:11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010092">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010092
  31. Maningat C. C., Seib P. A., Bassi S. D., Woo K. S. Chapter 10 - Wheat Starch: Production, Properties, Modification and Uses. Starch (Third Edition) 2009:441–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00010-0">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00010-0
  32. Rybaczewska-Błażejowska M., Jezierski D. Comparison of ReCiPe 2016, ILCD 2011, CML-IA baseline and IMPACT 2002+ LCIA methods: a case study based on the electricity consumption mix in Europe. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2024:29:1799–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02326-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02326-6
  33. Ismaeel W. S. E. Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in Green building rating systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:182:783–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.217">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2025-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 300 - 312
Submitted on: Apr 11, 2025
Accepted on: May 30, 2025
Published on: Jul 8, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2025 Nuushuun Archie Gboe, Mantas Garnevičius, Raimondas Grubliauskas, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.