Mind Over Waste: Decoding the Mental Models of Hard-to-Reach in Household Waste Practices
References
- DESA Publications. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-population-prospects-2024-summary-results
- Kour R. et al. Persistence and remote sensing of agri-food wastes in the environment: Current state and perspectives. Chemosphere 2023:317:137822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137822
- Udeagha M., Ngepah N. The nexus between innovation and environmental sustainability. 2023.
- Bai J., Shin H. D., Watkins M. Design for service-oriented approach: a case of collaborative consumption. University of Limerick. Conference contribution. https://doi.org/10.31880/10344/10162
- Europe is not prepared for rapidly growing climate risks. [Online]. [ Accessed 05.01.025]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/newsroom/news/europe-is-not-prepared-for
- European Climate Risk Assessment. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/european-climate-risk-assessment
- CGR 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://circularity-gap.world/2022#Download-the-report
- Sustainable waste management: what the EU is doing. Topics. European Parliament. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20180328STO00751/sustainable-waste-management-what-the-eu-is-doing
- European Commission. Waste and recycling. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling_en
- European Environment Agency. Latvia 2024 circular economy country profile. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/circular-economy/country-profiles-on-circular-economy/circular-economy-country-profiles-2024/latvia_2024-ce-country-profile_final.pdf
- De Laurentiis V., Caldeira C., Sala S., Tonini D. Life cycle thinking for the assessment of waste and circular economy policy: status and perspectives from the EU example. Waste Management 2024:179:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.02.037
- Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas likums [Waste Management Law]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=221378 (In Latvian).
- Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas likums un uz tā pamata izdotie Ministru kabineta noteikumi. [Waste Management Law and the regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers issued on its basis]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/atkritumu-apsaimniekosanas-likums-un-uz-ta-pamata-izdotie-ministru-kabinetanoteikumi (In Latvian).
- Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas valsts plāns 2021.–2028. gadam. [State waste management plan for the years 2021–2028]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/atkritumu-apsaimniekosanasvalsts-plans-2021-2028gadam-0
- Municipal waste statistics. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Municipal_waste_statistics
- Official Statistics Portal. Municipal and hazardous waste. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/environment/waste-management/other/5598-municipal-and-hazardous-waste
- Kantar survey on Latvian residents’ waste sorting habits. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://www.kantar.lv/cetri-no-pieciem-79-latvijas-iedzivotajiem-sava-majsaimnieciba-skiro-atkritumus/
- Clean R pētījums: atkritumus šķiro 68% iedzīvotāji, no tiem 50% – dabas saudzēšanas nevis naudas dēļ [Clean R study: 68% of residents sort waste, 50% of them – because of nature conservation and not money]. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://cleanr.lv/clean-r/aktualitates/clean-r-petijums-atkritumus-skiro-68-iedzivotaji-no-tiem-50-dabas-saudzesanas-nevis-naudas-del/
- Minelgaitė A., Liobikienė G. Waste problem in European Union and its influence on waste management behaviours. Science of The Total Environment 2019:667:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.313
- Myhrer K. S., Gaarder M. Ø., Berget I., Almli V. L. Need to Change, Want to Change, or Hard to Change? Targeting three dinner food waste profiles with regard to attitudes and personality traits. Food Quality and Preference 2024:119:105231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105231
- Vittuari M. et al. How to reduce consumer food waste at household level: A literature review on drivers and levers for behavioural change. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2023:38:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.023
- Popović A., Radivojević V. The circular economy: Principles, strategies and goals. Economics of Sustainable Development 2022:6(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.5937/ESD2201045P
- Hoffman M., Lubell M., Hillis V. Linking knowledge and action through mental models of sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014:111(36):13016–13021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400435111
- Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Conceptual Model, Scribd. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/463617709/MENTAL-MODELS
- Chen H., Cheng S., Qin Y., Xu W., Liu Y. Sustainability evaluation of urban large-scale infrastructure construction based on dynamic fuzzy cognitive map. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024:449:141774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141774
- Morone P., Falcone P. M., Lopolito A. How to promote a new and sustainable food consumption model: A fuzzy cognitive map study. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:208:563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.075
- Morone P., Yilan G., Imbert E. Using fuzzy cognitive maps to identify better policy strategies to valorize organic waste flows: An Italian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:319:128722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128722
- Özesmi U., Özesmi S. L. Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling 2004:176(1–2):43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027
- Kosko B. Adaptive inference in fuzzy knowledge networks. In Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, Dubois D., Prade H., Yager R. R., (Eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, 1993:888–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-1450-4.50093-6
- Mental Modeler. [Online]. [Accessed 16.04.2023]. Available: https://www.mentalmodeler.com/scenario/
- Gray S., Cox L., Henly-Shepard S. Mental Modeler: A Fuzzy-Logic Cognitive Mapping Modeling Tool for Adaptive Environmental Management. In 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.399
- Conservation strategies for sustainable resource use in the Kizilirmak Delta in Turkey – ProQuest. [Online]. [Accessed 12.03.2023]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/9f73b3626cd16bf9152e0707155f5406/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- Nakamura K., Iwai S., Sawaragi T. Decision Support Using Causation Knowledge Base. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1982:12(6):765–777. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308910
- Bohvalovs G., Kirsanovs V., Blumberga A., Blumberga D. Bioeconomy Sustainability Index: A Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0095
- Buede D. M., Ferrell D. O. Convergence in problem solving: a prelude to quantitative analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1993:23(3):746–765. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256547
- Harary F., Norman R. Z., Cartwright D. Structural models: an introduction to the theory of directed graphs. Wiley, 1965.
- Gray S., Chan A., Clark D., Jordan R. Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social – ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecological Modelling 2012:229:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.011
- Yoon B. S., Jetter A. J. Comparative analysis for Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping. In 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2016:1897–1908. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806755
- Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits. Topics | European Parliament. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits
- Bosma C., Glenk K., Novo P. How do individuals and groups perceive wetland functioning? Fuzzy cognitive mapping of wetland perceptions in Uganda. Land Use Policy 2017:60:181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.010
- Vasslides J. M., Jensen O. P. Fuzzy cognitive mapping in support of integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing a shared conceptual model among stakeholders. Journal of Environmental Management 2016:166:348–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.038
- Kokkinos K., Lakioti E., Papageorgiou E., Moustakas K., Karayannis V. Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities. Frontiers in Energy Research 2018:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00112
- Wiesner K., Ladyman J. What Is a Complex System? Yale University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300251104.001.0001
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 50
Submitted on: Dec 8, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 15, 2025
Published on: Jan 29, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Inguna Bremane, Veronika Liberova, Alise Egija Bezrucko, Dagnija Blumberga, Andra Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.