Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Organic versus Conventional Agriculture: Comparison of Economic and Environmental Sustainability

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 29 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. Murawska A., Goryńska-Goldmann E. Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Agricultural and Industrial Sectors – Change Trends, Economic Conditions, and Country Classification: Evidence from the European Union. Agriculture 2023:13(7):1354. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071354
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. European Commission. A European Green Deal | European Commission, 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 19.04.2021]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en#policy-areas
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. European Commission. CAP Strategic Plans - European Commission, 2023. [Online]. [Accessed: 19.11.2024]. Available: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/cap-my-country/cap-strategic-plans_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Gancone A., Viznere R., Kaleja D., Pubule J., D Blumberga. Towards Climate Neutrality via Sustainable Agriculture in Soil Management. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):535–547. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0041
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. European Court of Auditors. Common Agricultural Policy and climate – Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing. 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Mirescu L. The European Green Deal: moving to action Opportunities and challenges for the European citizens. Integrating the green deal targets into the common agricultural policy. [Online]. [Accessed 10.08.2022]. Available: www.iedonline.eu
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for A Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-friendly Food System. Brussels, 2020. [Online]. [Accessed 09.08.2022]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0381
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. European Commission: Directorate-General for Climate Action, Bognar J., Lam L., Forestier O., Finesso A. et al., Pricing agricultural emissions and rewarding climate action in the agri-food value chain. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2834/200
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Paura L., Berzina L., Degola L., Aplocina E., Kairisa D., Jonkus D., Skiste O. Trends in milk yield productivity and emissions from the dairy sector in Latvia. Agronomy Research 2023:21(3):1254–1265. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.23.047
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Latviàs National Inventory Report. [Online]. [Accessed 10.08.2022]. Available: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/mmr/art07_inventory/ghg_inventory/envzzvjlq/index_html?&page=2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Reaching 25% organic land with the right knowledge – Priorities for the new Organic Action Plan and the Horizon Europe Work Programmes FAO. [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1617913/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Ondrasek G. et al. Land Resources in Organic Agriculture: Trends and Challenges in the Twenty-First Century from Global to Croatian Contexts. Agronomy 2023:13(6):1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061544
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Bathaei A., Štreimikienė D. A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators. Agriculture 2023:13(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020241
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Cristache S. E., Vuţă M., Marin E., Cioacă S. I., Vuţă M. Organic versus Conventional Farming – A Paradigm for the Sustainable Development of the European Countries. Sustainability 2018:10(11):4279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114279
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Kelly E., Latruffe L., Desjeuc Y., Ryan M., Uthes S., Diazabakana A., Dillon E., Finn J. Sustainability indicators for improved assessment of the effects of agricultural policy across the EU: Is FADN the answer? Ecological Indicators 2018:89:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.053
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. European Commission. Latvia – Final updated NECP 2021–2030 (submitted in 2024). [Online]. [Accessed 13.11.2024]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/publications/latvia-final-updated-necp-2021-2030-submitted-2024_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. EU’s organic farming area reaches 14.7 million hectares. [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220222-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Agricultural Market Brief. Organic farming in the EU. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.12.2021]. Available: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-04/agri-market-brief-20-organic-farming-eu_en.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Segerkvist K. A., Hansson H., Sonesson U., Gunnarsson S. Research on Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature. Sustainability 2020:12(14):5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145502
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Latvijas lauksaimniecības siltumnīcefekta gāzu un amonjaka emisijas, kā arī CO2 piesaistes (aramzemēs un zālājos) robežsamazinājuma izmaksu līkņu (MACC) pielāgošana izmantošanai lauksaimniecības, vides un klimata politikas veidošanā (33,870 EUR) [Adjustment of the marginal reduction cost curves (MACC) of Latvian agricultural greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions, as well as CO2 sequestration (arable land and grassland) for use in the development of agricultural, environmental and climate policy (33,870 EUR). [Online]. [Accessed 25.04.2024]. Available: https://petijumi.mk.gov.lv/node/3748 (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. European Union – Cereal Yield (kg Per Hectare) – 2024 Data 2025 Forecast 1961–2022 Historical. [Online]. [Accessed 16.04.2024]. Available: https://tradingeconomics.com/european-union/cereal-yield-kg-per-hectare-wb-data.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Mansour Al-F., Jejčič V. Carbon footprint of conventional and organic crops production of family farms in Slovenia [Online]. [Accessed 25.04.2024]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268159548_CARBON_FOOTPRINT_OF_CONVENTIONAL_AND_ORGANIC_CROPS_PRODUCTION_ON_FAMILY_FARMS_IN_SLOVENIA
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Auzins A., Leimane I., Krievina A., Morozova I., Miglavs A., Lakovskis P. Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performance of Crop Production in Relation to Crop Rotation, Catch Crops, and Tillage. Agriculture 2023:13(8):1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081539
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Agroresursu un ekonomikas institūts. Ziņojums Lauku attīstības programmas 2014-2020 novērtēšanas ietvaros Bioloģiskās lauksaimniecības situācijas analīze un SVID [Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics. Report within the evaluation of the Rural Development Program 2014-2020 Analysis of the situation of organic agriculture and SWOT]. 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 19.11.2024]. Available: https://www.arei.lv/sites/arei/files/files/lapas/Atskaite_inov%C4%81cijas.pdf. (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Latvijas Republikas Zemkopības ministrija. Latvijas lauksaimniecība [Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Latvia. Latvian agriculture]. 2021, 2022. (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Zemkopības ministrija. Latvijas Kopējās lauksaimniecības politikas stratēģiskais plāns 2023.–2027. gadam [Ministry of Agriculture. Latvian Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plan 2023–2027]. [Online]. [Accessed 19.11.2024]. Available: https://www.zm.gov.lv/lv/latvijas-kopejas-lauksaimniecibas-politikas-strategiskais-plans-2023-2027gadam
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Methane emissions in the EU: the key to immediate action on climate change. European Environment Agency. [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/methane-emissions-in-the-eu/methane-emissions-in-the-eu
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Asadi A., Kalantari K., Choobchian S. Structural Analysis of Factors Affecting Agricultural Sustainability in Qazvin Province, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2013:15:11–22.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte. Pētījuma 5. posma pārskats un gala pārskats [Agricultural University of Latvia. Study Phase 5 Review and Final Review]. 2017. (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Latvijas Lauku konsultāciju un izglītības centrs. Labāka barības sagremojamība, lielāka ražība, mazāk izdalītā metāna [Latvian Rural Consultation and Education Center. Better feed digestibility, higher yield, less methane released]. [Online]. [Accessed 13.11.2024]. Available: https://new.llkc.lv/lv/nozares/lopkopiba/labaka-baribas-sagremojamiba-lielaka-raziba-mazak-izdalita-metana (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Līdzsvarota lauksaimniecība [Balanced agriculture]. [Online]. [Accessed 28.11.2024]. Available: efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.lptf.lbtu.lv/sites/lptf/files/2019-08/LF_Lidzsvarota%20lauksaimnieciba_Rakstu%20krajums_2019_gatavs (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Barības devas un slāpekļa emisijas [Feed rates and nitrogen emissions]. [Online]. [Accessed 29.11.2024]. Available: https://zemniekusaeima.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Bar%C4%ABbas-devas-un-sl%C4%81pek%C4%BCa-emisijas_LLKC_FIN.pdf (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Forage quality and feed intake effect on methane emissions from dairy farming [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://www.iitf.lbtu.lv/conference/proceedings2015/Papers/098_Trupa.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Gross A., Bromm T., Polifka S., Schierhorn F. The carbon footprint of milk during the conversion from conventional to organic production on a dairy farm in central Germany. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2022:42(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00775-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Karlsson J. O., Robling H., Cederberg C., Spörndly R., Lindberg M., Martiin C., Ardfors E., Tidåker P. What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years. Agricultural Systems 2023:212:103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103779
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Grodkowski G., Gołębiewski M., Slósarz J., Grodkowska k., et al. Organic Milk Production and Dairy Farming Constraints and Prospects under the Laws of the European Union. Animals 2023:13(9):1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091457
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Centrālā statistikas pārvalde. Visu veidu saimniecību grupējums pēc liellopu un slaucamo govju skaita gada beigās 1996–2023 [Central Statistical Office. Grouping of all types of holdings by the number of cattle and dairy cows at the end of the year 1996-2023]. [Online]. [Accessed 08.04.2024]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__LA__LAL/LAL110 (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Agroresursu un ekonnomikas institūts. Stratēģijas izstrāde noturīgas un multifunkcionālas piena nozares attīstībai Latvijā [Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics. Development of a strategy for the development of a sustainable and multifunctional dairy industry in Latvia]. 2021. [Online]. [Accessed 12.04.2024]. Available: https://www.arei.lv/lv/projekti/2021/strategijas-izstrade-noturigas-un-multifunkcionalas-piena-nozares-attistibai-latvija (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Lauksaimniecības datu centrs. Gada pārskati [Agricultural Data Center. Annual reports]. [Online]. [Accessed 08.04.2024]. Available: https://www.ldc.gov.lv/lv/gada-parskats (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Peterson C. B., Mitloehner F. M. Sustainability of the Dairy Industry: Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Frontiers in Animal Science 2021:2:760310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.760310
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Centrālā statistikas pārvalde. Bioloģiskās lauksaimniecības dzīvnieku skaits 2013–2022 [Central Statistical Office. Number of animals in organic farming 2013–2022]. [Online]. [Accessed 08.04.2024]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__BL__BLL/BLL010/ (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Chopin P., Mubaya C. P., Descheemaeker K., Öborn I., Bergkvist G. Avenues for improving farming sustainability assessment with upgraded tools, sustainability framing and indicators. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2021:41(2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00674-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Latruffe L., Diazabakana A., Bockstaller C., Desjeux Y., Finn J., et al. Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics 2016:118(3):123–130. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1624
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories – IPCC. [Online]. [Accessed 13.11.2024]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Magrini A., Giambona F. A Composite Indicator to Assess Sustainability of Agriculture in European Union Countries. Social Indicators Research 2022:163(3):1003–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02925-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Bonnet J., Coll-Martínez E., Renou-Maissant P. Evaluating Sustainable Development by Composite Index: Evidence from French Departments. Sustainability 2021:13(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020761
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Pandian G. S. Composite Performance Index for Sustainability. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 2013:3(1):91–102. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-03191102
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Rahman M. M., Szabó G. A Novel Composite Index to Measure Environmental Benefits in Urban Land Use Optimization Problems. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2022:11(4):220.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11040220
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Armin Razmjoo A., Sumper A., Davarpanah A. Development of sustainable energy indexes by the utilization of new indicators: A comparative study. Energy Reports 2019:5:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Hryhoruk P., Khrushch N., Grygoruk S. An Approach to Design a Composite Index of Economic Development and Identifying the Bounds of its Levels. 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT 2019 – Proceedings, 2019:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACITT.2019.8779918
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Diet optimization for dairy cows to reduce ammonia emissions. Presented at the Research for Rural Development 2021. Annual 27th International scientific conference proceedings, 2021:36–43. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.27.2021.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Average protein content in milk, % – Time period. [Online]. [Accessed 03.12.2024]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__LA__LAL/LAL050/table/tableViewLayout1/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Brodziak A., Wajs J., Zuba-Ciszewska M., Król J., Stobiecka M., Jańczuk A. Organic versus Conventional Raw Cow Milk as Material for Processing. Animals 2021:11(10):2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102760
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Zagorska J. The evaluation of organic milk quality [Online]. [Accessed 03.12.2024]. Available: https://studylib.net/doc/5904504/jelena-zagorska.-the-evaluation-of-organic-milk-quality.-...
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Latvijas Lauku konsultāciju un izglītības centrs. Cik izmaksā zemniekiem saražot bioloģisko pienu Latvijā? [Latvian Rural Consultation and Education Center. How much does it cost farmers to produce organic milk in Latvia?]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.12.2024]. Available: https://new.llkc.lv/system/files_force/aktualitates/cik_izmaksa_zemniekiem_sarazot_biologisko_pienu_latvija.pdf?download=1 (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Pirlo G., Lolli S. Environmental impact of milk production from samples of organic and conventional farms in Lombardy (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:211:962–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Bux C., Lombardi M., Varese E., Amicarelli V. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Conventional versus Organic Durum Wheat Production in Southern Italy. Sustainability 2022:14(15):9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159143
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Hietala S., Smith L., Knudsen M. T., S Kurppa., Padel S., Hermansen J. E. Carbon footprints of organic dairying in six European countries – real farm data analysis. Organic Agriculture 2015:5(2):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-014-0084-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 20
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2024
Accepted on: Dec 17, 2024
Published on: Jan 17, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Composite sustainability index,
dairy farming economic dimension,
environmental dimension,
greenhouse gas emissions,
organic agriculture
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2025 Lauma Balode, Ieva Pakere, Ilze Luksta, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 29 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)Next article