Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Carrier Material and Microbial Selection for Enhanced Methane Production in Ex-Situ Biomethanation Cover

Carrier Material and Microbial Selection for Enhanced Methane Production in Ex-Situ Biomethanation

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 28 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Plana P. V., Noche B. A review of the current digestate distribution models: storage and transport. Presented at the Waste management 2016, Valencia, Spain, Jun. 2016:345–357. https://doi.org/10.2495/WM160311">https://doi.org/10.2495/WM160311
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Fetting C. The European Green Deal, ESDN Office, Vienna, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Inaba R., Nagoya M., Kouzuma A., Watanabe K. Metatranscriptomic Evidence for Magnetite Nanoparticle-Stimulated Acetoclastic Methanogenesis under Continuous Agitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019:85(23). https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01733-19">https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01733-19
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Conrad R., Claus P., Casperb P. Stable isotope fractionation during the methanogenic degradation of organic matter in the sediment of an acidic bog lake, Lake Grosse Fuchskuhle. Limnology & Oceanography 2010:55(5):1932–1942. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.1932">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.1932
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Galand P. E., Yrjälä K., Conrad R. Stable carbon isotope fractionation during methanogenesis in three boreal peatland ecosystems. Biogeosciences 2010:7(11):3893–3900. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3893-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3893-2010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Bumbiere K., Diaz Sanchez F. A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Development and Assessment of Carbon Farming Solutions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):898–916. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0068">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0068
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Lawson N., Alvarado-Morales M., Tsapekos P., Angelidaki I. Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants. Energies 2021:14(24):8252. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248252">https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248252
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Akhlaghi N., Najafpour-Darzi G. A comprehensive review on biological hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020:45(43):22492–22512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.182">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.182
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Antukh T., Lee I., Joo S., Kim H. Hydrogenotrophs-Based Biological Biogas Upgrading Technologies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022:10:833482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.833482">https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.833482
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Jensen M. B., Poulsen S., Jensen B., Feilberg A., Kofoed M. V. W. Selecting carrier material for efficient biomethanation of industrial biogas-CO2 in a trickle-bed reactor. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2021:51:101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101611">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101611
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Sekoai P. T. et al. Microbial cell immobilization in biohydrogen production: a short overview. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 2018:38(2):157–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1312274">https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1312274
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Kourkoutas Y., Bekatorou A., Banat I. M., Marchant R., Koutinas A. A. Immobilization technologies and support materials suitable in alcohol beverages production: a review. Food Microbiology 2004:21(4):377–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2003.10.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2003.10.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Ashraf M. T., Triolo J. M., Yde L. Assay for testing packing materials for ex-situ bio-methanation. 2020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Taurino R. et al. New composite materials based on glass waste. Composites Part B: Engineering 2013:45(1):497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Green Gravels. [Online]. [Accessed 06.09.2023]. Available: https://gravels.ee/en/foam-glass-gravel/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Kusnere Z., Spalvins K., Bataitis M. Wood Ash Filter Material Characterization as a Carrier Material for Ex-Situ Biomethanation of Biogas in Biotrickling Filter Reactors. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):92–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0008">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Hernández J., Lafuente J., Prado Ó. J., Gabriel D. Startup and long-term performance of biotrickling filters packed with polyurethane foam and poplar wood chips treating a mixture of ethylmercaptan, H 2 S, and NH 3. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2013:63(4):462–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.763305">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.763305
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Spyridonidis A., Vasiliadou I. A., Stathopoulou P., Tsiamis A., Tsiamis G., Stamatelatou K. Enrichment of Microbial Consortium with Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens for Biological Biogas Upgrade to Biomethane in a Bubble Reactor under Mesophilic Conditions. Sustainability 2023:15(21):15247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115247">https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115247
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Smith N. W., Shorten P. R., Altermann E. H., Roy N. C., McNabb W. C. Hydrogen cross-feeders of the human gastrointestinal tract. Gut Microbes 2019:10(3):270–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1546522">https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1546522.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Worakit S., Boone D. R., Mah R. A., Abdel-Samie M.-E., El-Halwagi M. M. Methanobacterium alcaliphilum sp. nov., an H2-Utilizing Methanogen That Grows at High pH Values. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1986:36(3):380–382. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-36-3-380">https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-36-3-380
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Ahmad J. et al. A Step towards Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete by Using Partial Substitution of Wheat Straw Ash and Bentonite Clay Instead of Cement. Sustainability 2021:13(2):824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020824">https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020824
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Kusnere Z., Spalvins K., Blumberga D., Veidenbergs I. Packing materials for biotrickling filters used in biogas upgrading – biomethanation. Agronomy Research 2021:19. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.21.082">https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.21.082
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Boone D. R., Worakit S., Mathrani I. M., Mah R. A. Alkaliphilic methanogens from high-pH lake sediments. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 1986:7(2–3):230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(86)80011-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(86)80011-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kusnere Z., Rupeika D., Spalvins K., Mika T. Turning Trash into Treasure: The Use of Vulcanized Ash Filters and Glass Waste for Renewable Energy. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0076">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Waldow V. Redox reactions involving resazurin, resorufin, and dihydroresorufin. Wikimedia, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. DSMZ. Cultivation of Anaerobes. Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Angelidaki I. et al. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Science and Technology 2009:59(5):927–934. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040">https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Amodeo C. et al. How Different Are Manometric, Gravimetric, and Automated Volumetric BMP Results? Water 2020:12(6):1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061839">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061839
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Cord-Ruwisch R., Mercz T. I., Hoh C.-Y., Strong G. E. Dissolved hydrogen concentration as an on-line control parameter for the automated operation and optimization of anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1997:56(6):626–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971220)56:6<;626::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-P">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971220)56:6<626::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-P
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Hafner S. D. et al. Calculation of Methane Production from Manometric Measurements. Standard BMP Methods document 201, version 2.6. Available: https://www.dbfz.de/en/BMP (accessed on April 19, 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Chimenos J. M., Fernández A. I., Nadal R., Espiell F. Short-term natural weathering of MSWI bottom ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2000:79(3):287–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00270-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00270-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2024-0072 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 28, 2024
Accepted on: Dec 2, 2024
Published on: Dec 30, 2024
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Biomethanation,
carbon farming,
carrier material,
gas chromatography,
glass foam,
vulcanized wood ash material.
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2024 Zane Kusnere, Lauma Laipniece, Veronika Liberova, Dace Lauka, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 28 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)