Sustainable Operating Rooms: A Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Impact Analysis
References
- Karliner J., Slotterback S., R Boyd., Ashby B., Steele K. Healthcare’s climate footprint: How the health sector contributes to the global climate crisis and opportunities for action. European Journal of Public Health 2020:30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.843
- Sustainable Development Unit, Public Health England, NHS England. Reducing the use of natural resources in health and social care. Cambridge: Sustainable Development Unit [Online]. [Accessed 30.04.2020]. Available: https://www.sduhealth.org.uk/policy-strategy/reporting/sustainable-development-in-health-and-care-report2018.aspx
- Lee B.-K., Ellenbecker M. J., Moure-Eraso R. Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Management 2002:22(5):461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00006-5
- Deepak A., Sharma V., Kumar D. Life cycle assessment of biomedical waste management for reduced environmental impacts. J Cleaner Production 2022:349:131376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131376
- Rammelkamp Z., Dirnberger J., Johnson G., Waisbren S. An Audit of All Waste Leaving the Operating Room: Can the Surgical Suite Be More Environmentally Sustainable? World Medical and Health Policy 2021:13(1):126–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.397
- Kooner S. et al. Waste and recycling among orthopedic subspecialties. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2020:63(3):E278–E283. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018018
- Sullivan G. A., Reiter A. J., Hu A., Shah A. N., Dsida R., Raval M. V. Operating Room Recycling: Opportunities to Reduce Carbon Emissions Without Increases in Cost. Journal Pediatric Surgery 2023:58(11):2187–2191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.04.011
- Lee R. J., Mears S. C. Reducing and Recycling in Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 2012:27(10):1757–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.020
- Romano L., Giuliani A., Muselli M., Lupi E., Vistoli F. Toward Environmentally sustainable surgery: Waste recycling in general surgery operating room. Preliminary cognitive audit. World Journal of Surgery 2024:48(11):2637–2643. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12237
- Zlaugotne B., Pubule J., Gusca J., Kalnins S. N. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Healthcare Waste and Resource Potential Assessment. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0006
- Mikusinska M. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Surgical Scrub Suits: The Case of Reusable and Disposable Scrubs used in Swedish Healthcare. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stocholm, 2012.
- Campion N., Thiel C. L., Woods N. C., Swanzy L., Landis A. E., Bilec M. M. Sustainable healthcare and environmental life-cycle impacts of disposable supplies: A focus on disposable custom packs. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015:94:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.076
- Boberg L., Singh J., Montgomery A., Bentzer P. Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. PLoS One 2022:17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271601
- Cohen E. S. et al. Environmental Impact Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Head Covers. JAMA Surgery 2023:158(11):1216–1217. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3863
- Le N. N. T., Hernandez L. V., Vakil N., Guda N., Patnode C., Jolliet O. Environmental and health outcomes of single-use versus reusable duodenoscopes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022:96(6):1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.014
- Eckelman M., Mosher M., Gonzalez A., Sherman J. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2012:114(5):1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959
- Vozzola E., Overcash M., Griffing E. An Environmental Analysis of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Gowns. AORN Journal 2020:111(3):315–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12885
- MacNeill A. J., Lillywhite R., Brown C. J. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. The Lancet Planet Health 2017:1(9):e360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6
- Campion N., Thiel C. L., DeBlois J., Woods N. C., Landis A. E., Bilec M. M. Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US. Science of the Total Environment 2012:425:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.006
- Ditac G. et al. Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. EP Europace 2023:25(2):331–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac160
- Ferrero A., Thouvenin R., Hoogewoud F., Marcireau I., Offret O., Louison P., et al. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in a French University Hospital. Journal Français d’Ophtalmologie 2021:45(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.08.004
- Grinberg D. et al. Eco-audit of conventional heart surgery procedures. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2021:60(6):1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab320
- Latta M., Shaw C., Gale J. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Wellington. The New Zealand medical Journal 2021:134:1541.
- Namburar S., Pillai M., Varghese G., Thiel C., Robin A. L. Waste generated during glaucoma surgery: A comparison of two global facilities. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports 2018:12:87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.10.002
- Power B., Brady R., Connell P. Analyzing the carbon footprint of an intravitreal injection. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research 2021:16(3):367–376. https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9433
- Power N. E., Silberstein J. L., Ghoneim T. P., Guillonneau B., Touijer K. A. Environmental impact of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: An estimate of the carbon dioxide footprint. Journal of Endourology 2012:26(12):1639–1644. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0298
- Prakash R., Abid H., Wasim A., Sharma A., Agrawal Y. The Environmental Impact and Sustainability of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 2023:24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101254
- Rizan C., Lillywhite R., Reed M., Bhutta M. F. The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2023:116(6):199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231166135
- Rougereau G., Chatelain L., Zadegan F., Conso C. Estimation of the carbon footprint of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in France. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research 2024:110(1):103755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103755
- Ryan M. T., Malmrose J., Riley C. A., Tolisano A. M. Operating Room Waste Generated Across Otolaryngology Cases. Military Medicine 2023:188(7–8):E1697–E1700. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab548
- Stall N. M., Kagoma Y. K., Bondy J. N., Naudie D. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2013:56(2):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015711
- Thiel C. L., Eckelman M., Guido R., Huddleston M., Landis A. E., Sherman J., et al. Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: Life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 2015:49(3):1779–1786. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504719g
- Thiel C. L. et al. Cataract surgery and environmental sustainability: Waste and lifecycle assessment of phacoemulsification at a private healthcare facility. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2017:43(11):1391–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.017
- Woods D. L., McAndrew T., Nevadunsky N., Hou J. Y., Goldberg G., Kuo D. Y.-S., Isani S. Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: A comparison. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2015:11(4):406–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1640
- Zhang D., Dyer G. S. M., Blazar P., Earp B. E. The Environmental Impact of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Journal of Hand Surgery 2023:48(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.12.003
- Wernet G., Bauer C., Steubing B., Reinhard J., Moreno-Ruiz E., Weidema B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2016:21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
- UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs/Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, London, 2023 [Online]. [Accessed 16.08.2024]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/government-conversion-factors-for-company-reporting
- Heijungs R. Ecodesign – Carbon Footprint – Life Cycle Assessment - Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis. A Flexible Framework for a Continuum of Tools. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2010:4(1):42–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-010-0016-5
- SimaPro: LCA Software 2023, PRé Sustainability [Online]. [Accessed 16.08.2024]. Available: https://simapro.com/
- Roletto A., Savio A., Marchi B., Zanoni S. Towards a Greener Radiology: A Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Diagnostic Imaging. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2024:28(1):303–311. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2024-0024
Language: English
Submitted on: May 15, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2024
Published on: Dec 16, 2024
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Anna Savio, Beatrice Marchi, Andrea Roletto, Giuseppe Milano, Simone Zanoni, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.