Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Uncertainty of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Blended Textiles Cover

Uncertainty of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Blended Textiles

Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Horn S., Mölsä K. M., Sorvari J., Tuovila H., Heikkilä P. Environmental sustainability assessment of a polyester T-shirt – Comparison of circularity strategies. Science of The Total Environment 2023:884:163821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163821
  2. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions EU. Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles. Brussels, 30.3.2022.
  3. Stone C., Windsor F. M., Munday M., Durance I. Natural or synthetic – how global trends in textile usage threaten freshwater environments. Science of The Total Environment 2020:718:134689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134689
  4. Sohn J., Nielsen K. S., Birkved M., Joanes T., Gwozdz W. The environmental impacts of clothing: Evidence from United States and three European countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2021:27:2153–2164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.013
  5. Jana P. Challenges in the Traditional Fashion and Textile Supply Chain. In Lean Supply Chain Management in Fashion and Textile Industry, in Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer, Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2108-7_2
  6. Kahoush M., Kadi N. Towards sustainable textile sector: Fractionation and separation of cotton/polyester fibers from blended textile waste. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 2022:34:e00513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00513
  7. Juanga-Labayen J. P., Labayen I. V., Yuan Q. A Review on Textile Recycling Practices and Challenges. Textiles 2022:2(1):174–188. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010010
  8. Karthik T., Gopalakrishnan D. Environmental Analysis of Textile Value Chain: An Overview. In Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing, in Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer, Singapore, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-110-7_6
  9. Palacios-Mateo C., Van Der Meer Y., Seide G. Analysis of the polyester clothing value chain to identify key intervention points for sustainability. Environmental Sciences Europe 2021:33(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00447-x
  10. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. 2017.
  11. Wang S., Salmon S. Progress toward Circularity of Polyester and Cotton Textiles. Sustainable Chemistry 2022:3(3):376–403. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem3030024
  12. Zandberga A., Kalnins S. N., Gusca J. Decision-making Algorithm for Waste Recovery Options. Review on Textile Waste Derived Products. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):137–149. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0011
  13. Wagner V., Keil M., Lang-Koetz C., Viere T. Screening life cycle assessment of medical workwear and potential mitigation scenarios. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2023:40:602–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.026
  14. Gonçalves A., Silva C. Looking for sustainability scoring in apparel: A review on environmental footprint, social impacts and transparency. Energies 2021:14(11):3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113032
  15. Munasinghe P., Druckman A., Dissanayake D. G. K. A systematic review of the life cycle inventory of clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:320:128852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128852
  16. Van Der Velden N. M., Patel M. K., Vogtländer J. G. LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2014:19(2):331–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0626-9
  17. Zhang S., Xu C., Xie R., Yu H., Sun M., Li F. Environmental assessment of fabric wet processing from gate-to-gate perspective: Comparative study of weaving and materials. Science of The Total Environment 2023:857:159495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159495
  18. Sandin G., Peters G. M. Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:184:353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266
  19. Barahmand Z., Eikeland M. S. Life Cycle Assessment under Uncertainty: A Scoping Review. World 2022:3(3):692–717. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3030039
  20. Hauschild M. Z., Rosenbaum R. K., Olsen S. I. Eds. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3
  21. Roos S., Jönsson C., Posner S., Arvidsson R., Svanström M. An inventory framework for inclusion of textile chemicals in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2019:24(5):838–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1537-6
  22. Anh Dao Tran T., Thauvin E., Ferraz F., Drean E., Schacher L., Dominique A. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Dental Scrubs Made of Polyester/Cotton and 100% Cotton. In Advances in Applied Research on Textile and Materials – IX, vol. 17, Msahli S., Debbabi F., (Eds.), in Springer Proceedings in Materials. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2022:320–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08842-1_51
  23. Snigdha M. Hiloidhari, Bandyopadhyay S. Environmental footprints of disposable and reusable personal protective equipment ‒ a product life cycle approach for body coveralls. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023:394:136166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136166
  24. Narendra A. S. G. Accelerated Bleaching of Cotton Material with Hydrogen Peroxide. J Textile Sci Eng 2013:03:04. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-8064.1000140
  25. Voglhuber-Slavinsky A. et al. Setting life cycle assessment (LCA) in a future-oriented context: the combination of qualitative scenarios and LCA in the agri-food sector. European Journal of Futures Research 2022:10(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00203-9
  26. Benitez A., Wulf C., Steubing B., Geldermann J. Scenario-based LCA for assessing the future environmental impacts of wind offshore energy: An exemplary analysis for a 9.5-MW wind turbine in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2024:14(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-024-00474-z
  27. Rossi F., Zuffi C., Parisi M. L., Fiaschi D., Manfrida G. Comparative scenario-based LCA of renewable energy technologies focused on the end-of-life evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023:405:136931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136931
  28. Dolge K., Blumberga D. What are the Linkages between Climate and Economy? Bibliometric Analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):616–629. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0047
  29. Mohadab M. E., Bouikhalene B., Safi S. Bibliometric method for mapping the state of the art of scientific production in Covid-19. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2020:139:110052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110052
  30. Introduction to the Database. Ecoinvent. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.04.2024]. Available: https://support.ecoinvent.org/introduction-to-the-database
  31. Product Category Rules. The International EPD® System. [Online]. [Accessed: 22.10.2024]. Available: https://www.environdec.com/product-category-rules-pcr/the-pcr
  32. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework (ISO Standard No. 14040:2006). ISO 14040:2006, 2006. [Online]. [Accessed: 22.10.2024]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
  33. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Requirements and Guidelines (ISO Standard No. 14044:2006), 14044:2006, 2006. [Online]. [Accessed: 22.10.2024]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html
  34. European Commission. Joint Research Centre, and Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook -General guide for Life Cycle Assessment, Detailed guidance. Publications Office of the European Union, 2010.
  35. Jewell J., Koffler C., Murphy S. LCA Update of Cotton Fiber and Fabric Life Cycle Inventory. Cotton Incorporated. 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: 25.01.2024]. Available: http://resource.cottoninc.com/LCA/2016-LCA-Full-Report-Update.pdf
  36. Subramanian K., Chopra S. S., Cakin E., Li X., Lin C. S. K. Environmental life cycle assessment of textile bio-recycling – valorizing cotton-polyester textile waste to pet fiber and glucose syrup. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2020:161:104989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104989
  37. Zhao M. et al. Virtual carbon and water flows embodied in global fashion trade – a case study of denim products. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:303:127080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127080
  38. Zhang Y. et al. Improved design for textile production process based on life cycle assessment. Clean Techn Environ Policy 2018:20(6):1355–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1572-9
  39. Sara B., Tarantini M. Life Cycle Assessment of cotton/polyester fabric in B05 company. Nov. 2003. Accessed: Feb. 15, 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 22.10.2024]. Available: http://spring.bologna.enea.it/towefo/results_public_area/D20%20LCA/D20%20LCA_B05.pdf
  40. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the textiles industry: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (integrated pollution prevention and control). LU: Publications Office, 2023.
  41. Foisal A. B. M., Ahmed M. T. Dyeing of Polyester/Cotton Blended Woven Fabric in One Bath. SEU Journal of Science and Engineering 2017:11(2). [Online]. Available: https://seu.edu.bd/seujse/downloads/vol_11_no_2_dec_2017/01_Vol11No2Dec2017.pdf
  42. Hossain I., Moniruzzaman Md., Maniruzzaman Md., Jalil M. A. Investigation of the effect of different process variables on color and physical properties of viscose and cotton knitted fabrics. Heliyon 2021:7(8):e07735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07735
  43. Wang X., Jiang J., Gao W. Reviewing textile wastewater produced by industries: characteristics, environmental impacts, and treatment strategies. Water Science and Technology 2022:85(7):2076–2096. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.088
  44. PCR 2022:04 Fabrics (1.0.1). The International EPD® System, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Oct. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.environdec.com/api/v1/EPDLibrary/Files/b5abeb35-253e-49df-14ac-08da85915ae2/Data
  45. Ige O. E., Olanrewaju O. A., Duffy K. J., Collins O. C. Environmental Impact Analysis of Portland Cement (CEM1) Using the Midpoint Method. Energies 2022:15(7):2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072708
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2024-0061 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 25, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 11, 2024
Published on: Dec 9, 2024
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Megija Valtere, Tereza Bezrucko, Mojca Poberznik, Ilze Vamza, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.